Does experience improve hospital performance in treating patients with AIDS?

Health Policy ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles L. Bennett ◽  
Daniel Deneffe
2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Biju Augustine Puthanveettil ◽  
Shilpa Vijayan ◽  
Anil Raj ◽  
Sajan MP

PurposeThis paper explores and interprets the linkage between total quality management (TQM) practices and organizational performance measures for improving the healthcare firms’ performance. Indian healthcare firms are aware of TQM practices and their benefits, but the awareness level varies among the firms and staff. The study looks into the effectiveness of quality awareness to meet quality performance in Indian hospitals.Design/methodology/approachA questionnaire based on previous research was circulated among the managers and medical staff. The model linking TQM and organizational performance is analyzed with structural equation modelling and confirmed the hypotheses stated. Interpretations to improve hospital performance are made.FindingsThe study identified ten relevant TQM factors and confirmed their importance towards the improved organizational performance of Indian hospitals. Top management initiative, continuous process improvement and team work are the most contributing TQM factors. Differences in the awareness levels by the management staff and medical staff are attributed. The managers and medical staff are aware of the benefits of TQM towards firm performance, but it is to be improved further.Research limitations/implicationsCross-validation and interpretation are affected due to the limited sample size. Longitudinal study is recommended to explore the individual hospital as specific cases. Larger sample size is suggested as an extended work to overcome the demographic and infrastructural limitations of the firms included.Practical implicationsThe management is more interested in TQM, but there is lack of awareness among the staff. The quality awareness and customer focus by medical staff are the most weakly loaded factors, and the weaknesses can be remedied by the lead role by the hospital management in providing proper training and thereby improving the attitude of the medical staff.Social implicationsEffectiveness of hospital operations is highly dependent on customer focus. Properly communicated, committed and trained staff with good-quality awareness can better implement TQM and thereby improve hospital performance. Lead role by the management is very important, and the paper lists ways to attain these outcomes.Originality/valueVery little is reported from the Indian healthcare sector linking TQM and outcome performance. The quality awareness, customer focus, communication and learning by the medical staff are to be improved, and the paper suggests ways to link TQM more effectively to improve the performance in hospitals. These findings may be useful to the managers, medical staff and researchers in healthcare to bring better results.


Author(s):  
Jonas Schreyögg

Since the 1980s policymakers have identified a wide range of policy interventions to improve hospital performance. Some of these have been initiated at the level of government, whereas others have taken the form of decisions made by individual hospitals but have been guided by regulatory or financial incentives. Studies investigating the impact that some of the most important of these interventions have had on hospital performance can be grouped into four different research streams. Among the research streams, the strongest evidence exists for the effects of privatization. Studies on this topic use longitudinal designs with control groups and have found robust increases in efficiency and financial performance. Evidence on the entry of hospitals into health systems and the effects of this on efficiency is similarly strong. Although the other three streams of research also contain well-conducted studies with valuable findings, they are predominantly cross-sectional in design and therefore cannot establish causation. While the effects of introducing DRG-based hospital payments and of specialization are largely unclear, vertical and horizontal cooperation probably have a positive effect on efficiency and financial performance. Lastly, the drivers of improved efficiency or financial performance are very different depending on the reform or intervention being investigated; however, reductions in the number of staff and improved bargaining power in purchasing stand out as being of particular importance. Several promising avenues for future investigation are identified. One of these is situated within a new area of research examining the link between changes in the prices of treatments and hospitals’ responses. As there is evidence of unintended effects, future studies should attempt to distinguish between changes in hospitals’ responses at the intensive margin (e.g., upcoding) versus the extensive margin (e.g., increase in admissions). When looking at the effects of entering into a health system and of privatizations, there is still considerable need for research. With privatizations, in particular, the underlying processes are not yet fully understood, and the potential trade-offs between increases in performance and changes in the quality of care have not been sufficiently examined. Lastly, there is substantial need for further papers in the areas of multi-institutional arrangements and cooperation, as well as specialization. In both research streams, natural experiments carried out using program evaluation design are lacking. One of the main challenges here, however, is that cooperation and specialization cannot be directly observed but rather must be constructed based on survey or administrative data.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1357633X2093244
Author(s):  
Mei Zhao ◽  
Hanadi Hamadi ◽  
Jing Xu ◽  
D Rob Haley ◽  
Sinyoung Park ◽  
...  

Introduction Previous studies indicated that telehealth services may improve hospital performance. However, the extent to which these telehealth provisions would improve hospital total performance score under the hospital value-based purchasing (HVBP) programme is not clear. The aim of this study is to examine the association between telehealth provision and hospital performance. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the association between the provision of telehealth services and 2699 hospital’s total performance score (TPS) on the 2018 HVBP programme and its four domains. Multivariate regression models were used to analyse TPS and hospital performance on each domain. Telehealth services offered by a hospital was categorically operationalized as hospitals with no telehealth services, with one to two telehealth services, and with three or more telehealth services. Results Hospitals with one to two telehealth services have TPS (ß coefficient = 1.50; 95% confident intervals (CI): 0.28, 2.73; p < 0.05) and hospitals with three or more telehealth services have higher efficiency and cost reduction (ß = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.32, 1.87; p < 0.01) domain scores. However, the impact of telehealth on clinical care, person and community engagement, and safety domain scores was not significant. Discussion The expansion of hospital telehealth service provision can improve not only the efficiency of care, but also the total performance of the hospital. Since total performance is directly associated with hospital payments from the government, these findings have significant practice and policy implications. In addition, the effect of telehealth on other quality measures such as clinical care and safety needs further investigation.


Author(s):  
Stephen L Rennyson ◽  
Michael C Kontos ◽  
Anita Y Chen ◽  
Karen P Alexander ◽  
Matthew T Roe ◽  
...  

Introduction: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publicly reports mortality as well as 8 established core measures for patients (pts) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in an effort to measure and improve hospital performance. Our goal was to determine if compliance with CMS measures among PCI centers correlates with in-hospital STEMI mortality. Methods: We studied 96,340 consecutive STEMI pts from 349 PCI capable sites from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry’s ACTION Registry from 1/07-3/11. Hospitals were separated into groups by observed risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality: low (20%), middle (60%), and high mortality (20%). For each grouping, the proportional adherence to AMI core measures were reported, along with medians and inter-quartile ranges (IQR) for the composite 7 core measure score. Spearman correlations were calculated between core measures and risk adjusted mortality. Results: Low mortality hospitals had a median and IQR mortality of 3.5% (3.0, 3.9%), vs 5.9% (5.2, 6.6%) and 9.0% (8.3, 10.4%) for the middle and high mortality hospitals. Differences in the rate of individual and composite CMS core measure adherence were significantly different across most of the measures among the 3 hospital groups, although these differences were clinically small (Table). Most individual core measures and the composite scores were significantly correlated with mortality, although the associations were weak. Conclusion: Despite a high adherence to CMS core measures for STEMI patients there is only a weak correlation with risk adjusted in-hospital mortality. Thus, these core measures may not accurately differentiate quality of hospital care.


2011 ◽  
pp. 508-531
Author(s):  
Mahendran Maliapen ◽  
Alan Gillies

This paper uses simulation modelling techniques and presents summarized model outputs using the balanced scorecard approach. The simulation models have been formulated with the use of empirical health, clinical and financial data extracted from clinical data warehouses of a healthcare group. By emphasising the impact of strategic financial and clinical performance measures on healthcare institutions, it is argued that hospitals, in particular, need to re-focus cost-cutting efforts in areas that do not impact clinicians, patient satisfaction or quality of care. The authors have added a real time component to business activity monitoring with the executive dashboards shown as graphs in this paper. This study demonstrates that it is possible to understand health policy interactions and improve hospital performance metrics through evaluation using balanced scorecards and normalized output data. Evidence from this research shows that the hospital executives involved were enthusiastic about the visual interactive interface that provides the transparency needed to isolate policy experimentation from complex model structures that map strategic behaviour.


The Lancet ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 364 (9445) ◽  
pp. 1560-1561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Molyneux ◽  
Martin W Weber

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.A.M. van Lent ◽  
R.D. de Beer ◽  
B. van Triest ◽  
W.H. van Harten

AbstractIntroduction: Benchmarking can be used to improve hospital performance. It is however not easy to develop a concise and meaningful set of indicators on aspects related to operations management. We developed an indicator set for managers and evaluated its use in an international benchmark of radiotherapy centres. The indicator set assessed the efficiency, patient-centeredness and timeliness of the services delivered.Methods: We identified possible indicators from literature and professionals. Stakeholders’ feedback helped to produce a shortlist of indicators. For this indicator set, data were obtained in a pilot that included four European radiotherapy centres. With these data, the indicators were evaluated on definition clarity, data availability, reliability and discriminative value.Results: Literature produced a gross list of 81 indicators. Based on stakeholder feedback, 33 indicators were selected and evaluated in the benchmark. Six negatively evaluated indicators were adapted, together with eight positively evaluated indicators 14 indicators seemed feasible. Examples of indicators concerned utilisation, waiting times, patient satisfaction and risk analysis.Conclusions: This study provides a pragmatic indicator development process for international benchmarks on operations management. The presented indicators showed to be feasible for use in international benchmarking of radiotherapy centres. The pilot identified attainable performance levels and provided leads for improvements.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 66-84
Author(s):  
Annelies van der Ham ◽  
Arno van Raak ◽  
Dirk Ruwaard ◽  
Frits van Merode

PurposeIntegration, that is, the coordination and alignment of tasks, is widely promoted as a means to improve hospital performance. A previous study examined integration and differentiation, that is, the extent to which tasks are segmented into subsystems, in a hospital's social network. The current study carries this research further, aiming to explain integration and differentiation by studying the rules and coordination mechanisms that agents in a hospital network use.Design/methodology/approachThe current case study deepens the analysis of the social network in a hospital. All planning tasks and tasks for surgery performance were studied, using a naturalistic inquiry approach and a mixed method.FindingsOf the 314 rules found, 85% predominantly exist in people's minds, 31% are in documents and 7% are in the information system. In the early planning stages for a surgery procedure, mutual adjustment based on hospital-wide rules is dominant. Closer to the day of surgery, local rules are used and open loops are closed through mutual adjustment, thus achieving integration. On the day of surgery, there is mainly standardization of work and output, based on hospital-wide rules. The authors propose topics for future research, focusing on increasing the hospital's robustness and stability.Originality/valueThis exploratory case study provides an overview of the rules and coordination mechanisms that are used for organizing hospital-wide logistics for surgery patients. The findings are important for future research on how integration and differentiation are effectively achieved in hospitals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document