An Interactive Procedure for Solving Group Decision Problems

Author(s):  
Grzegorz Kersten
2015 ◽  
Vol 713-715 ◽  
pp. 1769-1772
Author(s):  
Jie Wu ◽  
Lei Na Zheng ◽  
Tie Jun Pan

In order to reflect the decision-making more scientific and democratic, modern decision problems often require the participation of multiple decision makers. In group decision making process,require the use of intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid averaging operator (IFHA) to get the final decision result.


2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 678-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tung-King See ◽  
Kemper Lewis

Supporting the decision of a group in engineering design is a challenging and complicated problem when issues like consensus and compromise must be taken into account. In this paper, we present the foundations of the group hypothetical equivalents and inequivalents method and two fundamental extensions making it applicable to new classes of group decision problems. The first extension focuses on updating the formulation to place unequal importance on the preferences of the group members. The formulation presented in this paper allows team leaders to emphasize the input from certain group members based on experience or other factors. The second extension focuses on the theoretical implications of using a general class of aggregation functions. Illustration and validation of the developments are presented using a vehicle selection problem. Data from ten engineering design groups are used to demonstrate the application of the method.


1974 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 845-846
Author(s):  
Ralph H. Kilmann

The experiment investigated whether achievement and affiliation concerns would induce the phenomenon encountered in the risk-shift and related group studies. Using three decision-problems involving such concerns, Ss first responded to the three problems individually, then in randomly assigned groups, and then separately again. In comparison to Ss in a control condition, results indicate that the risk-shift phenomenon generalizes to achievement and affiliation shifts, both in the group decision and in Ss post-group responses.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-113
Author(s):  
Wambié Zongo ◽  
Zoïnabo Savadogo ◽  
Sougoursi Jean Yves Zare ◽  
Somdouda Sawadogo ◽  
Blaise Some

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document