Homeotic Genes in the Genetic Control of Flower Morphogenesis in Antirrhinum majus

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
pp. 242-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsuzsanna Schwarz-Sommer ◽  
Heinz Saedler ◽  
Hans Sommer
Science ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 250 (4983) ◽  
pp. 931-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Schwarz-Sommer ◽  
P. Huijser ◽  
W. Nacken ◽  
H. Saedler ◽  
H. Sommer

1982 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2231-2234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regine Spribille ◽  
Gert Forkmann

2010 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyasu Yamaguchi ◽  
Tomoya Niki ◽  
Tomoko Niki ◽  
Takaaki Nishijima

1981 ◽  
Vol 36 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 411-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Forkmann ◽  
G. Stotz

Abstract In flower extracts of defined genotypes of Antirrhinum majus, two different hydroxylases were found catalysing the hydroxylation of naringenin and eriodictyol in the 3-position and of naringenin in the 3′-position. The 3-hydroxylase is a soluble enzyme and belongs according to its cofactor requirement to the 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. Investigations on different genotypes revealed a clear correlation between block of the anthocyanin pathway by recessive alleles of the gene inc and a complete lack of 3-hydroxylase activity. Chemogenetic studies on different genotypes suggested that the 3′-hydroxyl group of the B-ring of flavonoids is introduced at the stage of C15 intermediates. The corresponding 3′-hydroxylase was found to be localized in the microsomal fraction and required NADPH as cofactor. In confirmation of the chemogenetic studies, a strict correlation was found between 3′-hydroxylase activity and the gene eos which is known to control the hydroxylation of flavones, flavonols and anthocyanins in the 3′-position. These results are similar to those previously obtained with Matthioia incana.


1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 593-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Mendoza ◽  
D. Thieffry ◽  
E. R. Alvarez-Buylla

Development ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 101 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 17-24
Author(s):  
Rolf Nöthiger ◽  
Monica Steinmann-Zwicky

The combined efforts of genetics, developmental and molecular biology have revealed the principles of genetic control of sexual differentiation in Drosophila. In combination with maternal components, a quantitative chromosomal signal, provided by the ratio of X chromosomes to sets of autosomes (X: A), regulates a key gene (Sxl). The functional state, ON or OFF, of Sxl, via a few subordinate regulatory genes, controls a switch gene (dsx) that can express two mutually exclusive functions, M or F. These serve to repress either the female or the male set of differentiation genes, thus directing the cells either into the male or into the female sexual pathway. Investigations of control genes and their regulation show that they have properties of homeotic genes. Their role is to select one of two alternative developmental programs. Their function, or lack of function, is required throughout development to maintain the cells in their respective sexual pathway. Differentiation genes are under negative control by dsx. We discuss the cis- and tams-regulatory elements that are needed for sex-, tissue- and stage-specific expression of the differentiation genes. A comparison of Drosophila to other organisms such as Caenorhabditis, mammals and other insects indicates similarities that we interpret as evidence for a basically invariant genetic strategy used by various organisms to regulate sexual development.


Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 169-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Sommer ◽  
Wolfgang Nacken ◽  
Pio Beltran ◽  
Peter Huijser ◽  
Heike Pape ◽  
...  

deficiens, together with other homeotic genes, is involved in the genetic control of floral morphogenesis in A. majus. Mutations in this gene cause homeotic transformations of petals to sepals and stamens to carpels, thus producing male sterile flowers. The deduced DEF A protein shows homology to the DNA-binding domain of the transcription factors SRF of mammals (activating c-fos) and MCM1 of yeast (regulating mating type), suggesting that DEF A has a possible regulatory function as a transcription factor. Interestingly, DEF A belongs to a family of putative transcription factors, called the MADS box genes, whose DNA-binding domains show conserved homology. Two members of this family correlate with known morphogenetic mutants of Antirrhinum. DEF A is constantly expressed during flower development in all floral organs; it is strongly expressed in petals and stamens, but only at a low basal level in the other organs. Molecular, genetic and morphological observations with deficiens morphoalleles indicate that transcriptional and post-transcriptional control of deficiens specifies and diversifies its function in space and time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document