Surgical Results in Microadenomas

Author(s):  
M. Giovanelli ◽  
M. Losa ◽  
P. Mortini ◽  
S. Acerno ◽  
E. Giugni
Keyword(s):  
2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Juhász ◽  
L Székely ◽  
L Lukács ◽  
Z Szabó ◽  
A Haán ◽  
...  

Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (S 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Liu ◽  
Ilman Kim ◽  
Matthew Hunt ◽  
Sean McMenomey ◽  
Johnny Delashaw, Jr.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 119-122
Author(s):  
Yuko Takami ◽  
Masaki Tateishi ◽  
Tomoki Ryu ◽  
Yoshiyuki Wada ◽  
Hideki Saitsu

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiyang Yang ◽  
Gang Bai ◽  
Yongli Zhang ◽  
Guolong Chen ◽  
Lei Duan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There are few articles about the surgical techniques of thalamic glioma and the lesions in the basal ganglia area. According to three existing cases and the literature review (Twelve articles were summarized which mainly described the surgical techniques), we discuss the surgical characteristics of lesions of the thalamus and basal ganglia area and summarize the relevant surgical skills. Case presentation Of the three cases, two were thalamic gliomas and one was brain abscess in basal ganglia. According to the three-dimensional concept of the “Four Walls, Two Poles”, lesions of the thalamus and basal ganglia were surgically removed, and the operative effect was analysed by relevant surgical techniques. Surgical resection of the lesions of the thalamus and basal ganglia area according to the three-dimensional concept of the “Four Walls, Two Poles” has achieved good surgical results. Relevant surgical techniques, such as the use of retractors, the use of aspirators, the choice of surgical approaches, and the haemostasis strategy, also played an important role in the operation process. Conclusions In the presented three cases the three-dimensional concept of the “Four Walls, Two Poles” allowed for safe surgical resection of lesions of the thalamus and basal ganglia.


2021 ◽  
pp. 205141582199372
Author(s):  
Dariush Irani ◽  
Abdolreza Haghpanah ◽  
Mohammad Mehdi Hosseini ◽  
Leila Malekmakan ◽  
Mohammad Ali Ashraf ◽  
...  

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the differences in outcomes and complications in stone-directed antegrade pyelography using the ‘bull’s eye’ technique in patients with renal stones versus the conventional method of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Although conventional PCNL access using retrograde pyelography is useful, it is time-consuming and may cause postoperative discomfort. Herein, we report our experience in the application of this new technique. Methods: Between January 2017 and June 2018, 100 patients participated in this randomized clinical trial. Stone-directed antegrade pyelography using the ‘bull’s eye’ technique under fluoroscopic guidance was used for percutaneous access in the intervention group. The second group, consisting of those who had undergone conventional PCNL using retrograde pyelography and ‘bull’s eye’ technique in the same period, were considered as the controls. Pre- and postoperative laboratory examinations, surgical results and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: A single calyceal puncture in partial staghorn and staghorn stone patients was sufficient in 72.2% of the antegrade group and in 78.9% of the retrograde group ( p=0.69). The double-puncture technique was necessary for 71.9% of renal pelvis stones in the antegrade group and for 9.4% in the retrograde group ( p<0.001). The antegrade approach reduced the mean operative time and analgesic requirement significantly ( p<0.001). No statistically significant difference, however, was found between the two groups regarding stone migration to the ureter, radiation time and postoperative complications. Conclusions: The stone-directed antegrade approach using the ‘bull’s eye’ technique is a safe and accurate method in PCNL access in patients with radiopaque and semi-opaque renal stones.


1991 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 886-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Miralles ◽  
Luis Bracamonte ◽  
Halim Soncul ◽  
Roberto Diaz del Castillo ◽  
Rama Akhtar ◽  
...  

Endoscopy ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 129-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Siegel ◽  
J. S. Ben-Zvi ◽  
W. Pullano ◽  
A. Cooperman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document