Ventricular septal defect in Chinese with aortic valve prolapse and aortic regurgitation

Author(s):  
Hung-Chi Lue ◽  
Tseng-Chen Sung ◽  
Shou-Hsien Hou ◽  
Mei-Hwan Wu ◽  
Su-Ju Cheng ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 599-606
Author(s):  
Zhaoyang Chen ◽  
Wanhua Chen ◽  
Hang Chen ◽  
Zhenmei Liao ◽  
Qiang Chen ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground:Outcome data of doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect closure in adults are limited.Methods:A review was made of the inpatients >18 years of age who underwent doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect closure between June 2010 and June 2017.Results:The patients were categorised into two groups: The valve intervention group consisted of 31 patients who underwent aortic valvuloplasty, aortic valve replacement, or repair of sinus Valsalva aneurysm in addition to doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect closure; non-valvular intervention group comprised 58 patients who underwent only doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect closure. The groups did not differ by sex and age. Patients in the valve intervention group, with a larger ventricular septal defect size, were shorter and tended to be lighter. The valve intervention group had more patients with pneumonia perioperatively. No infective endocarditis and reoperation were noted during the study period. At last follow-up, 91 and 96.6% of the studied patients were free from left ventricle dilation and pulmonary hypertension. In patients without pre-operative aortic regurgitation, 12 developed new mild aortic regurgitation during the follow-up.Conclusions:About 34.8% of adult patients with doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect required concurrent intervention on aortic valve or sinus Valsalva aneurysm. The midterm results of doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect closure in adult patients were favourable. However, the incidence of new mild aortic regurgitation after ventricular septal defect closure was high (27.3%). Long-term follow-up of aortic regurgitation progression is needed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1696-1702
Author(s):  
Hanna Jung ◽  
Joon Yong Cho ◽  
Youngok Lee

Abstract In patients with subarterial ventricular septal defect (VSD), the progression of aortic regurgitation (AR) still remains unclear. This review is to identify the incidence of AR progression after VSD repair and to determine the optimal operation timing for subarterial VSD repair with or without aortic valve prolapse or AR. From January 2002 to December 2015, 103 patients who underwent subarterial VSD repair alone at our hospital were reviewed. All patients routinely underwent echocardiography (echo) performed by our pediatric cardiologists. The operative approach was through the pulmonary artery in all patients. The median age of patients at operation was 10 months (range 3 to 16.5 months). Eighty-nine patients (86.4%) underwent subarterial VSD closure before the age of 4 years. In the preoperative evaluation, 27.2% (28 patients) of the patients showed more than faint degree AR. The mean follow-up duration after VSD repair was 6.6 ± 4.0 years. In the latest follow-up echo after VSD repair, four patients had more than mild degree AR owing to aortic valve abnormalities or delayed operation period. Among them, AR progression occurred in only one patient (0.98%). Early and accurate assessment of the anatomical morphology of the aortic valve and optimal operation timing may be important to achieve better outcomes after repair and to prevent the development of aortic valve complications.


1986 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung-Chi Lue ◽  
Tseng-Chen Sung ◽  
Shou-Hsien Hou ◽  
Mei-Hwan Wu ◽  
Su-Ju Cheng ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.G. Eroglu ◽  
F. Öztunç ◽  
L. Saltik ◽  
S. Dedeoglu ◽  
S. Bakari ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 1028-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
KATSUHIKO TATSUNO ◽  
SOUJI KONNO ◽  
MASAHIKO ANDO ◽  
SHIGERU SAKAKIBARA

Author(s):  
Jack Hartnett ◽  
Lisa Brandon ◽  
Deirdre Waterhouse ◽  
Ross T Murphy ◽  
Kevin P Walsh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven efficacy in the treatment of aortic stenosis (AS). Understandably there is increasing enthusiasm for its use to treat aortic regurgitation (AR). However, there are significant anatomical differences between AS and AR which make TAVI for AR more complex. Case Summary We present the case of technically challenging TAVI for severe AR, which was complicated by a traumatic ventricular septal defect (VSD) that required percutaneous closure. To our knowledge this is the first published case of VSD post TAVI for AR. Discussion This unanticipated complication highlights anatomical differences between TAVI use in AS and AR. Lack of aortic valve calcification and excessive annular compliance made stable deployment of a self-expanding valve extremely challenging. Despite device oversizing, repeated embolization of the prosthesis into the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) traumatised the interventricular septum.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document