Experiments to Test the Reality of de Broglie Waves

Author(s):  
J. R. Croca
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan-yue Xiao ◽  
Cheng-ping Huang
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1763-1777
Author(s):  
James M Hill

The existence of the so-called ‘dark’ issues of mechanics implies that our present accounting for mass and energy is incorrect in terms of applicability on a cosmological scale, and the question arises as to where the difficulty might lie. The phenomenon of quantum entanglement indicates that systems of particles exist that individually display certain characteristics, while collectively the same characteristic is absent simply because it has cancelled out between individual particles. It may therefore be necessary to develop theoretical frameworks in which long-held conservation beliefs do not necessarily always apply. The present paper summarises the formulation described in earlier papers (Hill, JM. On the formal origin of dark energy. Z Angew Math Phys 2018; 69:133-145; Hill, JM. Some further comments on special relativity and dark energy. Z Angew Math Phys 2019; 70: 5–14; Hill, JM. Special relativity, de Broglie waves, dark energy and quantum mechanics. Z Angew Math Phys 2019; 70: 131–153.), which provides a framework that allows exceptions to the law that matter cannot be created or destroyed. In these papers, it is proposed that dark energy arises from conventional mechanical theory, neglecting the work done in the direction of time and consequently neglecting the de Broglie wave energy [Formula: see text]. These papers develop expressions for the de Broglie wave energy [Formula: see text] by making a distinction between particle energy [Formula: see text] and the total work done by the particle [Formula: see text], that which accumulates from both a spatial physical force [Formula: see text] and a force [Formula: see text] in the direction of time. In any experiment, either particles or de Broglie waves are reported, so that only one of [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text] is physically measured, and particles appear for [Formula: see text] and de Broglie waves occur for [Formula: see text], but in either event both a measurable and an immeasurable energy exists. Conventional quantum mechanics operates under circumstances such that [Formula: see text] vanishes and [Formula: see text] becomes purely imaginary. If both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are generated as the gradient of a potential, the total particle energy is necessarily conserved in the conventional manner.


1965 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 1178-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kulhánek
Keyword(s):  

Some recent experiments of Davisson and Germer on the scattering of electrons by a crystal have drawn attention to the conditions at a crystal boundary. In interpreting their results in terms of de Broglie waves, the authors have to postulate a contraction of the crystal lattice at the surface— in some cases of as much as 30 per cent.f It is, therefore, important that other independent methods should be devised to indicate what change (if any) takes place at a crystal surface. Unfortunately X-rays are unable to help in this respect as several hundred atomic layers are necessary to produce a Bragg reflection pattern ; nor is theory able to provide an answer in the case of metallic crystals such as are used by Davisson and Germer because little is known of the forces which hold a metal together. Certain other cases can, however, be considered theoretically, and these may indicate the order of the effect to be expected in metallic crystals. In this paper we consider the change in spacing at a (100) boundary of a crystal of the NaCl type, this boundary being considered because it is a natural plane of crystal. Two effects are to be anticipated: (1) a change of spacing between planes at the boundary; (ii) a change of spacing between atoms in the surface layer itself. These effects are considered separately and independently. Actually, of course, each affects the other, but this is assumed to be a correction of the second order.


2006 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Forest S. Patton ◽  
Daniel P. Deponte ◽  
Greg S. Elliott ◽  
Stephen D. Kevan

2002 ◽  
Vol 50 (5-7) ◽  
pp. 664-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Pu ◽  
Chris Search ◽  
Weiping Zhang ◽  
Pierre Meystre
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document