scholarly journals Human Rights and Human Nature

Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-534
Author(s):  
Jean Rhéaume

At least two important consequences follow from the fact that human rights are based on human nature. First, they exist according to natural law even in cases where positive law does not recognize them. Secondly, they cannot evolve because the nature and purpose of the human being does not change: only their formulation and level of protection in positive law can vary according to the socio-historical context.


2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALEXANDRA HUNEEUS

AbstractThis article argues that human rights law – which mediates between claims about universal human nature, on the one hand, and hard-fought political battles, on the other – is in particular need of a richer exchange between jurisprudential approaches and social science theory and methods. Using the example of the Inter-American Human Rights System, the article calls for more human rights scholarship with a new realist sensibility. It demonstrates in what ways legal and social science scholarship on human rights law both stand to improve through sustained, thoughtful exchange.


2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Vittorio Possenti

Parece que hay dos diferentes versiones de los derechos humanos en la tradición occidental: a saber, la racionalista y la cristiana; la primera adoptada por la revolución francesa, la última altamente desarrollada en el renacimiento español. Actuales críticas relativistas tratan de negar la universalidad de los derechos humanos alegando que es una teoría que ha sido creada por países occidentales o que no tiene una justificación fuerte, y que por tanto no puede tener un alcance universal; pero esta objeción puede ser descartada con una justificación alternativa de los derechos humanos.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-126
Author(s):  
M. S. Sushentsova ◽  
◽  
M. A. Miroshnichenko ◽  
Ph. A. Lymar ◽  
◽  
...  

This article compares Marx’s understanding of such concepts as rights, freedom and equality underlying the concept of justice with that of classical and modern liberalism. It is shown that Marx did not reject the key values of liberalism but approached them from two perspectives — historical and anthropological. On the one hand, Marx criticized the exercise of human rights under capitalism as «bourgeois», pointing out that they justify the alienation of the human condition and disguise economic exploitation as fair market exchange. On the other hand, Marx proposed his own model of future equality based on the values of self-realization and solidarity, and ultimately on his idea of the «generic» human nature. This approach goes beyond deontological justice, developed by modern liberal thought in the Rawlsian spirit, and at the same time brings Marx’s views closer to the tradition of natural law and modern communitarianism.


2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscilla Alderson

Children tend to be missing from the literature on human rights. Sociology can help to fill the gap by providing evidence about the importance and benefits of recognising children's human rights, the dangers of not doing so, and joint rights-promoting work by adults and children. However, sociology has paid relatively little attention to human rights, and to the related topics of the Holocaust, human nature, real bodies, universal principles and moral imperatives. This paper examines splits in sociology around a central absence, which could partly explain these omissions. Then it considers how inter-disciplinary approaches and critical realism can help to theorise and validate “the inherent dignity and…the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family”. The youngest children's rights illuminate meanings in all human rights, which depend less on the rational person approach than on recognising human nature, vulnerability and solidarity interacting with social structures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document