Bearing Capacity Improvement of Sand Bed Reinforced with 3D Geogrids of Rectangular Pattern

Author(s):  
Femy M. Makkar ◽  
S. Chandrakaran ◽  
N. Sankar
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Mahdi Hajitaheriha ◽  
Davood Akbarimehr ◽  
Amin Hasani Motlagh ◽  
Hossein Damerchilou

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arup Bhattacharjee ◽  
Satyendra Mittal ◽  
A. Krishna

Author(s):  
G. L. Sivakumar Babu ◽  
B. Srinivasa Murthy ◽  
D. S. N. Murthy ◽  
M. S. Nataraj

2012 ◽  
Vol 170-173 ◽  
pp. 252-255
Author(s):  
Xiao Hui Mao ◽  
Qiang Yue

The flexible pile and the rigid pile, the gravel pile and CFG pile are arranged in a group as compound piles, which utilize their merits and avoid their shortcomings. Based on the study of the existing calculation methods for the bearing capacity of multi-pile composite foundation, the working behavior of loaded multi-pile composite foundation and the general influence of different construction methods to the bearing capacity of the soil are considered. The coefficient of the bearing capacity exertion of master piles, the coefficient of the bearing capacity exertion of minor piles, the coefficient of the bearing capacity exertion of the soil between piles and the coefficient of the bearing capacity improvement of the soil are introduced. The new step-by-step calculation method for the bearing capacity of multi-pile composite foundation is put forward. Through designed a high-rise frame structure with multi-type-pile composite foundation, the results show that the multi-type-pile composite foundation is more whole and possess stronger capacity of load transfer compared with single-type-pile composite foundation. It can satisfy the requirements of load bearing capacity and deformation under special foundation conditions.


2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 754-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujit Kumar Dash ◽  
Mukul Chandra Bora

This paper investigates the influence of geosynthetic encasement on the performance of stone columns floating in soft clay. It was found that with unencased columns the bearing capacity improvement is about 3.5 fold, but with geogrid encasement the improvement increases to 5 fold, where 60% of the column length is encased. With full-length encasement (i.e., 100%), the improvement is only about 3 fold. It is therefore evident that partially encased floating columns are superior to the fully encased ones. In contrast, with end-bearing stone columns, full-length encasement is reported to have exhibited better performance improvement than the partially encased ones. In the former case (floating columns), it is the bulge formation at a deeper depth that enhances the bearing capacity, while in the latter case (end-bearing columns), it is the stiffening effect of the encasement that enables the column to transmit the surcharge pressure onto the competent strata below.


2018 ◽  
Vol 181 ◽  
pp. 01001
Author(s):  
Hasriana ◽  
Lawalenna Samang ◽  
Tri Harianto ◽  
M.Natsir Djide

The problem that is often faced in a road construction is a soil subgrade (soft soil). If the subgrade has a low bearing capacity, causing the soil to decrease greatly, so the road construction will quickly be damaged. Method to overcome the problem is bio stabilization with bacteria utilization. The purpose of this research is to know the bearing capacity improvement of soft soil as subgrade layer with bacteria solution of bacillus subtilis. Tests include soil physical and mechanical properties, compaction parameters and CBR tests. This test is based on ASTM for each test. Variations in addition of bacterial solution were 2%, 4%, 6%, 8% and 10% of dry soil weight with 7 days curing time. The results showed that the maximum value of CBR of soft soil was found at 39% on 6% bacterial solution. Increased CBR value from 2.8% to 39% or 13 times than untreated soil. This shows the use of bacterial concentration solution on soft soil significantly increases the bearing capacity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document