Generalized Constraint Representation of Adjectives in PNL

Author(s):  
Bushra Siddique ◽  
M. M. Sufyan Beg
2004 ◽  
Vol 01 (02) ◽  
pp. 309-328
Author(s):  
R. J. HO ◽  
S. A. MEGUID ◽  
R. G. SAUVÉ

This paper presents a unified novel technique for enforcing nonlinear beam-to-shell, beam-to-solid, and shell-to-solid constraints in explicit finite element formulations. The limitations of classical multi-point constraint approaches are examined at length, particularly in the context of explicit solution schemes. Novel formulation of a generalized constraint method that ensures proper element coupling is then presented, and its computer implementation in explicit integration algorithms is discussed. Crucial in this regard is the accurate and efficient representation of finite rotations, accomplished using an incremental rotation tensor. The results of some illustrative test cases show the accuracy and robustness of the newly developed algorithm for a wide range of deformation, including that in which large rotations are encountered. When compared to existing works, the salient features of the current method are in evidence.


Author(s):  
Ronald R. Yager

The concept of a generalized constraint is introduced and as means of representing different kinds of information. The measurement of the amount of information contained in these constraints is then considered. First we consider possibilistic constraints, those in which the associated variable can take on only one value and show that the measure of specificity provides the appropriate measure. We then provide a measure of information in a fuzzy graph. We next turn to veristic constraints, those in which the associated variable can assume multiple values, and show that the associated measure of information is the negation of the measure of fuzziness. Finally we discuss the idea that their can exist some uncertainty associated with the variable in a generalized constraint and provide some measure of the information about the variable.


1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 777-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Chen ◽  
A. A. Shabana ◽  
J. Rismantab-Sany

In both the augmented and recursive formulations of the dynamic equations of flexible mechanical systems, the inerita, constraints, and applied forces must be properly defined. The inverse dynamics is a commonly used approach for the force analysis of mechanical systems. In this approach, the system is kinematically driven using specified motion trajectories, and the objective is to determine the driving forces and torques. In flexible body dynamics, however, a force that acts at a point on the deformable body is equipollent to a system, defined at another point, that consists of the same force, a moment that depends on the relative deformation between the two points, and a set of generalized forces associated with the elastic coordinates. Furthermore, a moment in flexible body dynamics is no longer a free vector. It is defined by the location of its line of action as well as its magnitude and direction. The joint reaction and generalized constraint forces represent equipollent systems of forces. Both systems in flexible body dynamics are function of the deformation. In this investigation, a procedure is developed for the determination of the joint reaction forces in spatial flexible mechanical systems. The mathematical formulation of some mechanical joints that are often encountered in the analysis of constrained flexible mechanical systems is discussed. Expressions for the generalized reaction forces in terms of the constraint Jacobian matrices of the joints are presented. The effect of the elastic deformation on the reaction forces is also examined numerically using the spatial flexible multibody RSSR mechanism that consists of a set of interconnected rigid and elastic bodies. The procedure described in this investigation can also be used to determine the joint torques and actuator forces in kinematically driven spatial elastic mechanism and manipulator systems.


1993 ◽  
Vol 16 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 319-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Le Provost ◽  
Mark Wallace

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Stadlmayr ◽  
Wolfgang Witteveen ◽  
Wolfgang Steiner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document