Food Sharing in Human Societies

Nobuhiro Kishigami
1986 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-393 ◽  
Thomas Caraco ◽  
Jerram L. Brown

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Jorg J. M. Massen ◽  
Sofia M. Haley ◽  
Thomas Bugnyar

Abstract Helping others is a key feature of human behavior. However, recent studies render this feature not uniquely human, and describe discoveries of prosocial behavior in non-human primates, other social mammals, and most recently in some bird species. Nevertheless, the cognitive underpinnings of this prosociality; i.e., whether animals take others’ need for help into account, often remain obscured. In this study, we take a first step in investigating prosociality in azure-winged magpies by presenting them with the opportunity to share highly desired food with their conspecifics i) in a situation in which these conspecifics had no such food, ii) in a situation in which they too had access to that highly desired food, and iii) in an open, base-line, situation where all had equal access to the same food and could move around freely. We find that azure-winged magpies regularly share high-value food items, preferably with, but not restricted to, members of the opposite sex. Most notably, we find that these birds, and specifically the females, seem to differentiate between whether others have food or do not have food, and subsequently cater to that lack. Begging calls by those without food seem to function as cues that elicit the food-sharing, but the response to that begging is condition-dependent. Moreover, analyses on a restricted dataset that excluded those events in which there was begging showed exactly the same patterns, raising the possibility that the azure-winged magpies might truly notice when others have access to fewer resources (even in the absence of vocal cues). This sharing behavior could indicate a high level of social awareness and prosociality that should be further investigated. Further studies are needed to establish the order of intentionality at play in this system, and whether azure-winged magpies might be able to attribute desire states to their conspecifics.

1986 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-400 ◽  
Laura L. Betzig ◽  
Paul W. Turke

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 186-195 ◽  
Adrian V. Jaeggi ◽  
Michael Gurven

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (4) ◽  
pp. 474-487 ◽  
Eloísa M. Guerreiro Martins ◽  
Antonio C. de A. Moura ◽  
Christa Finkenwirth ◽  
Michael Griesser ◽  
Judith M. Burkart

Nature ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 308 (5955) ◽  
pp. 181-184 ◽  
Gerald S. Wilkinson

1972 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-324 ◽  
Rada Dyson‐Hudson ◽  
Roxann Van Dusen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document