Stability Derivative Identification Using Adaptive Robust Extended Kalman Filter for Multirotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (M-UAV)

Author(s):  
Danial Rosli ◽  
Erwin Sulaeman ◽  
Ari Legowo ◽  
Alia Farhana Abdul Ghaffar
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kexin Guo ◽  
Zhirong Qiu ◽  
Wei Meng ◽  
Lihua Xie ◽  
Rodney Teo

This article puts forward an indirect cooperative relative localization method to estimate the position of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) relative to their neighbors based solely on distance and self-displacement measurements in GPS denied environments. Our method consists of two stages. Initially, assuming no knowledge about its own and neighbors’ states and limited by the environment or task constraints, each unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) solves an active 2D relative localization problem to obtain an estimate of its initial position relative to a static hovering quadcopter (a.k.a. beacon), which is subsequently refined by the extended Kalman filter to account for the noise in distance and displacement measurements. Starting with the refined initial relative localization guess, the second stage generalizes the extended Kalman filter strategy to the case where all unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) move simultaneously. In this stage, each unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) carries out cooperative localization through the inter-unmanned aerial vehicle distance given by ultra-wideband and exchanging the self-displacements of neighboring unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). Extensive simulations and flight experiments are presented to corroborate the effectiveness of our proposed relative localization initialization strategy and algorithm.


2020 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 322-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathaus Ferreira da Silva ◽  
Leonardo M. Honório ◽  
Andre Luis M. Marcato ◽  
Vinicius F. Vidal ◽  
Murillo F. Santos

Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 2855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nak Ko ◽  
Wonkeun Youn ◽  
In Choi ◽  
Gyeongsub Song ◽  
Tae Kim

This research used an invariant extended Kalman filter (IEKF) for the navigation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), and compared the properties and performance of this IEKF with those of an open-source navigation method based on an extended Kalman filter (EKF). The IEKF is a fairly new variant of the EKF, and its properties have been verified theoretically and through simulations and experiments. This study investigated its performance using a practical implementation and examined its distinctive features compared to the previous EKF-based approach. The test used two different types of UAVs: rotary wing and fixed wing. The method uses sensor measurements of the location and velocity from a GPS receiver; the acceleration, angular rate, and magnetic field from a microelectromechanical system-attitude heading reference system (MEMS-AHRS); and the altitude from a barometric sensor. Through flight tests, the estimated state variables and internal parameters such as the Kalman gain, state error covariance, and measurement innovation for the IEKF method and EKF-based method were compared. The estimated states and internal parameters showed that the IEKF method was more stable and convergent than the EKF-based method, although the estimated locations, velocities, and altitudes of the two methods were comparable.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2.3) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Mishell D. Lawas ◽  
Sherwin A. Guirnaldo

The stability of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) during actual flight conditions is one parameter that is very important in systems design in Avionics. In this research, two sensors, the autopilot microcontroller and the smartphone gyroscope sensing mechanism, are fused together and calibrated to monitor the flying behavior of the UAV prior to actual test flights. The two fused sensors and installed inside the UAV for relatively increased sensing accuracy and best flight monitoring capabilities. A Kalman filter is used as fusion technique and a Stewart Motion tracker is also used to test the ruggedness and accuracy of the fused sensor system. Experiment results show that fused system can give an overall mean square error or 1.9729.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document