Forest canopies

Vegetatio ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-225 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 440 ◽  
pp. 109394
Author(s):  
Elena Plekhanova ◽  
Pascal A. Niklaus ◽  
Jean-Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry ◽  
Gabriela Schaepman-Strub

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan H. Phinney ◽  
Yngvar Gauslaa ◽  
Kristin Palmqvist ◽  
Per‐Anders Esseen

2004 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Hopkinson ◽  
Mike Sitar ◽  
Laura Chasmer ◽  
Paul Treitz

2012 ◽  
Vol 90 (7) ◽  
pp. 798-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.W. Pettit ◽  
K.T. Wilkins

Characteristics of edges affect the behavior of species that are active in and near edges. Forest canopies may provide edge-like habitat for bats, though bat response to edge orientation has not been well examined. We sampled bat activity in quaking aspen ( Populus tremuloides Michx.) forest canopies and edges in Heber Valley, Utah, during summer 2009 using Anabat detectors. Categorization and regression tree (CART) analysis of echolocation characteristics (e.g., frequency, duration) identified two guilds based on characteristic frequency (i.e., high- and low-frequency guilds). We used linear regression to compare characteristics of canopy and edge vegetation (e.g., tree height, diameter at breast height) to bat activity levels. Activity levels of high-frequency bats did not respond differentially to edge vegetation; low-frequency bat activity seemed to respond to canopy height. Activity levels of high-frequency bats were significantly greater than low-frequency bats in both edges and canopies. We detected significantly more bat activity in forest edges than in forest canopies, indicating the importance of edges to bats in forests.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 3526-3547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Asner ◽  
Roberta Martin

Endeavour ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Melvin G.R. Cannell
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document