Orientation sensitivity of the visual movement detection system activating the landing response of the blowflies, Calliphora, and Phaenicia: A behavioural investigation

1980 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik Eckert
1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Udd ◽  
Ronald G. Blom ◽  
David M. Tralli ◽  
Elric W. Saaski ◽  
Roy Dokka

Author(s):  
Emran Mohd Tamil ◽  
Ti Siang Tey ◽  
Mohd Rais Mustafa ◽  
Mohd Yamani Idna Idris ◽  
Mohd Hairul Nizam Md Nasir

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 798
Author(s):  
Liang-Hsuan Lu ◽  
Female ◽  
Shang-Lin Chiang ◽  
Chueh-Ho Lin ◽  
Wen-Hsu Sung

1984 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1341-1347 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.P.M. Lenting ◽  
H.A.K. Mastebroek ◽  
W.H. Zaagman

Author(s):  
Watcharin Tangsuksant ◽  
Chittaphon Aekmunkhongpaisal ◽  
Patthiya Cambua ◽  
Theekapun Charoenpong ◽  
Theerasak Chanwimalueang

1972 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 401-413
Author(s):  
JOHN C. COGGSHALL

1. The landing response of the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus consists primarily of extension at one leg joint (femur-tibia) of each of the front four legs upon presentation of the appropriate visual stimulus. 2. Small-field peripherally directed angular motion in the frontal visual hemisphere is sufficient to elicit the landing response. 3. Movement from the periphery is not an effective stimulus. 4. Response latency to a large-field peripherally moving striped pattern decreases monotonically with increasing angular velocity. 5. This decrease is consistent with what is known of the dynamics of motiondetecting neurones in other insects. 6. It is suggested that motor mechanisms controlling the landing response, optomotor turning reactions and flight-power behaviour receive inputs from a common neural motion-detection system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document