Functional or conventional plate prebending in 90� angled blade plate osteosynthesis of intertrochanteric osteotomies

1993 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-81
Author(s):  
J. Schmidt
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Maes ◽  
Guy Putzeys

Abstract Background: Conventional plate osteosynthesis is a valuable treatment option in displaced proximal and/or middle one-third humeral shaft fractures. Nonetheless, this procedure can be complicated by a radial nerve palsy. To date, many surgical techniques have been developed in an attempt to minimize this high-impact complication. However, a helical plate has the potential to avoid an iatrogenic radial nerve palsy due to its design. This article aims to evaluate safety and functional outcomes of patients treated with a helical plate compared to conventional plate osteosynthesis. In particular healing rates, complications and functional outcome measures.Methods: We retrospectively included all patients with displaced proximal and/or middle one-third humeral shaft fractures who were treated with a helical plate from October 2016 until August 2018 at a single level-1 trauma center (AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium). A self-molded long PHILOS plate (DePuy Synthes®) or a pre-contoured A.L.P.S proximal humeral plating system (Zimmer Biomet®) were used. Patient baseline characteristics and standard radiographs were obtained pre- and postoperatively. We retrospectively searched for complications. Patients were reassessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Constant Murley (CMS) and EQ-5D-5L scores with a minimal follow-up of one year.Results: The humeral shaft fractures of all sixteen patients consolidated within three months and no iatrogenic radial nerve palsies were observed. One plate had to be removed after one year due to a late infection. With a minimum follow up of one year, the mean DASH score was 22 \ 19 and the mean normalized CMS was 80 B 19.Conclusion: Operative treatment of proximal and/or middle one-third humeral shaft fractures with a helical plate is a safe procedure with good to excellent shoulder function at one-year follow-up. Contrary to conventional plate osteosynthesis, a helical plate has the potential to completely avoid a radial nerve palsy, while maintaining similar healing rates and functional outcomes.Trial registration: B396201939564. Registered on 6 MAY 2019 – retrospectively registred. Ethics Committee: Medical Ethics Committee, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.


Orthopedics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. e649-e654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon Yub Kim ◽  
Byung Chan Yoo ◽  
Jong Pil Yoon ◽  
Sung Jin Kang ◽  
Seok Won Chung

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter D. Fabricant ◽  
Alex J. Anatone ◽  
Kenneth M. Lin ◽  
Christopher M. Brusalis ◽  
Alexandra T. Mackie ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marcus Christian Müller ◽  
Michael Windemuth ◽  
Sophie Frege ◽  
Eva Nadine Striepens

Background: Chronic exposure to occupational ionising radiation is seen as one reason for elevated cancer prevalence. </P><P> Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate radiation exposure of anaesthetists by real-time dosimetry. Methods: Data of 296 patients were analyzed. Ten types of trauma operation procedures including osteosynthesis of upper and lower extremity fractures and minimally invasive stabilisation of traumatic and osteoporotic vertebral fractures were accomplished. Evaluation was performed by an occupational dosimetry system, which visualises anaesthetists radiation exposure feedback compared to surgeons in real-time. Results: A significantly lower radiation exposure to anaesthetists compared to surgeons was observed in four types of operative procedures: Plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures, osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures, stabilisation of traumatic and osteoporotic vertebral fractures. In four types of operations (plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral, distal radial and tibial fractures and intramedullary nailing of the clavicle), anaesthetists` amount of radiation exceeded one-third of the surgeons' exposure, especially if the C-arm tube was positioned close to the anaesthetists work station at the patients' head. Conclusion: By using the occupational radiation dose monitoring system, radiation exposure to anaesthetists was visualised in real-time during trauma operations. Radiation exposure of anaesthetists depends on the type of operation and the position of the C-arm. The system may help to increase anaesthetists` awareness concerning radiation exposure and to enhance compliance in using radiation protection techniques.


Author(s):  
Apipop Kritsaneephaiboon ◽  
Watit Wuttimanop ◽  
Surasak Jitprapaikulsarn ◽  
Pornpanit Dissaneewate ◽  
Chulin Chewakidakarn ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document