AIDS: A case management approach. The illinois experience

1987 ◽  
Vol 4 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 130-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peggy Magee ◽  
Florence L. Senizaiz
1988 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxine Harris ◽  
Helen C. Bergman

2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 1202-1203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Bernabei ◽  
Graziano Onder ◽  
Francesco Landi

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e032955
Author(s):  
Masaki Fujiwara ◽  
Masatoshi Inagaki ◽  
Taichi Shimazu ◽  
Masafumi Kodama ◽  
Ryuhei So ◽  
...  

IntroductionOne of the reasons for the high mortality rate from cancer in people with schizophrenia is delay in diagnosis. Many studies have shown lower cancer screening rates in people with schizophrenia; however, there are no interventions for people with schizophrenia to increase cancer screening. Therefore, we developed a case management (CM) intervention to encourage participation in cancer screening. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of CM to encourage participation in cancer screening for people with schizophrenia, with particular focus on colorectal cancer screening by faecal occult blood testing, compared with usual intervention (UI), namely, municipal public education.Methods and analysisThis is an individually randomised, parallel group trial with blinded outcome assessments. The participants will be randomly allocated to either the CM plus UI group or UI alone group in a 1:1 ratio using a web-based program at a data management centre. The primary end point of the study is participation in colorectal cancer screening in the year of intervention, which will be assessed based on municipal records.Ethics and disseminationThis study is performed in accordance with Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects published by Japan’s Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology and the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare and the modified Act on the Protection of Personal Information as well as the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee at the Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Okayama University Hospital on 23 April 2019 (approval number: RIN1904-003). The findings of this trial will be submitted to an international peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberUMIN000036017.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S129-S130
Author(s):  
M Liu ◽  
S Guh ◽  
J Chaisson ◽  
K Tisdale ◽  
S Nigam

1993 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven S. Martin ◽  
Frank R. Scarpitti

The need for drug abuse treatment to reduce recidivism in prison systems has led to increasing interest in treatment alternatives for correctional clients. The research on the effectiveness of treatment alternatives, however, has lagged behind the interest in and implementation of new programs. This article reports on early findings from an ongoing longitudinal study of the efficacy of an intensive case management approach, Assertive Community Treatment (ACT), for treating parolees with past drug problems, compared with a group of parolees who were not offered this treatment program. Using follow-up data on 135 subjects interviewed at release from prison and then reinterviewed about six months later, the ACT group and comparison group are examined in terms of recidivism and relapse to drug use. Bivariate analyses suggest little difference between the two groups. Multivariate analyses, however, suggest several important variables that were not manipulated in this “quasi-experiment,” but are predictive of relapse and recidivism. Although the limited sample size available at present precludes any definitive conclusions, discussion focuses on the direction of findings and highlights the necessity for multivariate controls in assessing the effectiveness of any intervention with criminal justice clients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 1451-1468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deirdre O'Donnell ◽  
Margaret P. Treacy ◽  
Gerard Fealy ◽  
Imogen Lyons ◽  
Attracta Lafferty

2006 ◽  
Vol 105 (8) ◽  
pp. 636-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong-Luh Lin ◽  
Fung-J Lin ◽  
Chien-Liang Wu ◽  
Ming-Jen Peng ◽  
Pei-Jan Chen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 132
Author(s):  
Kanokporn Khankaew ◽  
Nalintip Ongsombat ◽  
Atchariya Wonginchan ◽  
Vichai Senthong ◽  
Chollada Thronsao

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document