Metrological certification of nonstandard measuring equipment

1978 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 597-599
Author(s):  
V. N. Zhuravlev ◽  
U. R. Mallin ◽  
B. Yu. Yusupov ◽  
I. I. Bitkulov ◽  
T. I. Vlasova



1979 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 1430-1433
Author(s):  
A. L. Lunev ◽  
G. O. Polyakov


1977 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 326-327
Author(s):  
G. V. Lavinskii ◽  
I. N. Momot ◽  
V. V. Dutchak


2020 ◽  
pp. 50-53
Author(s):  
V. R. Kozubovsky

Gas analyzers, especially toxic and explosive devices, are usually measuring equipment. Therefore, it is very important to ensure their metrological parameters. For this purpose, their metrological certification is carried out periodically. However, this procedure is quite costly and is carried out by metrological centers that put state sea­ler seals and write a suitable device for operation or not. The interval of the calibration interval is usually more than 1 year and during this period the metrological parameters of the device change and it becomes unsuitable (from the point of view of metrological centers) for operation. Device developers, when writing “inter-calibration interval, for example, 1 year”, they guarantee the preservation of metrological parameters for 1 year. If a longer period has elapsed, the instrument must be set up before calibration. However, the device is customized by the developer or a qualified professional. As a rule, the owner of the appliance does not have such an opportunity and the state verifier lacks it. Therefore, it is very important that the owner of the device is able to independently check its performance. There are many met­hods of calibration of the instrument — for example, partial darke­ning of the working channel, introduction of a sealed cuvette with a certain concentration of the measured gas into the working channel, etc. [1-6]. But all of them have certain disadvantages both in terms of a large error and the possibility of their implementation in option.



1987 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 806-808
Author(s):  
I. A. Zhuravlev ◽  
T. I. Maslova ◽  
L. Kh. Radionova


1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 1778-1779
Author(s):  
V. A. Kolivoshko ◽  
B. Ya. Kogan ◽  
A. N. Kamlyuk


1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 1768-1769
Author(s):  
A. K. Pugachev ◽  
�. N. Smirnova


2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (7) ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
K. V. Gogolinsky ◽  
A. E. Ivkin ◽  
V. V. Alekhnovich ◽  
A. Yu. Vasiliev ◽  
A. E. Tyurnina ◽  
...  

Thickness is one of the key indicators characterizing the quality and functional properties of coatings. Various indirect methods (electromagnetic, radiation, optical) most often used in practice to measure thickness are based on the functional dependence of a particular physical parameter of the system «base – coating» on the coating thickness. The sensitivity of these procedures to the certain properties of coatings imposes the main restriction to the accuracy of measurements. Therefore, the development and implementation of the approaches based on direct measurements of geometric parameters of the coating appears expedient. These methods often belong to the class of «destructive» and, in addition to measuring instruments, require the use of special equipment. To ensure the uniformity of measurements in the laboratory or technological control, these methods are isolated as a separate procedure (method) and must undergo metrological certification in accordance with GOST R 8.563–2009. We present implementation, metrological certification and practical application of the method for measuring thickness of coatings by crater-grinding method. The principles of technical implementation of test equipment, measurement procedure and calculation formulas are described. The results of evaluating the accuracy indicators of the proposed procedure by calculation and experimental methods are presented. In both cases, the relative error did not exceed 6%. The applicability of the developed technique is shown for a wide range of coating materials (from soft metals to superhard ceramics) of different thickness (with from units to hundreds of micrometers). Apart from the goals of process control and outgoing inspection, the method can be recommended as a reference measurement procedure for calibration of measures and adjusting samples for various types of thickness gauges.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document