The developmental priority of the evaluative dimension in perceptions of nonverbal cues

1979 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bella M. DePaulo ◽  
Robert Rosenthal ◽  
Susan Finkelstein ◽  
Russell A. Eisenstat
Keyword(s):  
Nonverbal Cues ◽  
Evaluative Dimension

Necessity of Nonverbal Cues in Socially Threatening Situations

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine E. Donnelly ◽  
Phyllis S. Ohr
Keyword(s):  
Nonverbal Cues

Nonverbal Cues of Liking and Rejection During Speed Dating

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Rau ◽  
Jessica Carter ◽  
Jessica Brown ◽  
Heide Island
Keyword(s):  
Nonverbal Cues ◽  
Speed Dating

Nonverbal Cues Associated with Negotiation 'Styles' Across Cultures

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaleh Semnani-Azad ◽  
Wendi L. Adair
Keyword(s):  
Nonverbal Cues

An Assessment of the Cues College Students Interpret From a Sexual Partner to Determine They Are Refusing

2021 ◽  
pp. 088626052199793
Author(s):  
Tiffany L. Marcantonio ◽  
Danny Valdez ◽  
Kristen N. Jozkowski
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
College Students ◽  
Sexual Partner ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
The United States ◽  
Sexual Partners ◽  
Sexual Scripts ◽  
Nonverbal Cues ◽  
Sexual Experiences ◽  
Verbal Cues

The purpose of this study was to assess the cues college students use to determine a sexual partner is refusing vaginal-penile sex (i.e., refusal interpretations). As a secondary aim, we explored the influence of item wording ( not willing/non-consent vs refusal) on college students’ self-reported refusal interpretations. A sample of 175 college students from Canada and the United States completed an open-ended online survey where they were randomly assigned to one of two wording conditions ( not willing/non-consent vs refusal); students were then prompted to write about the cues they used to interpret their partner was refusing. An inductive coding procedure was used to analyze open-ended data. Themes included explicit and implicit verbal and nonverbal cues. The refusal condition elicited more explicit and implicit nonverbal cues than the not willing/non-consent condition. Frequency results suggested men reported interpreting more explicit and implicit verbal cues. Women reported interpreting more implicit nonverbal cues from their partner. Our findings reflect prior research and appear in line with traditional gender and sexual scripts. We recommend researchers consider using the word refusal when assessing the cues students interpret from their sexual partners as this wording choice may reflect college students’ sexual experiences more accurately.

scholarly journals Cognitive–Evaluative Dimension of Pain in Neuropathic Pain Relapse in Sciatica: A Case Report

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 658
Author(s):  
Tsubasa Kawasaki ◽  
Takuya Yada ◽  
Masahiro Ohira
Keyword(s):  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Acute Phase ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Evaluative Dimension ◽  
Long Duration ◽  
Improvement Process ◽  
Insight Into

The cognitive–evaluative (C–E) dimension of pain is commonly observed in patients with a relatively long duration of pain. However, little is known about the effects of pain relapse on the C–E dimension of pain. Moreover, the improvement process of the C–E dimension of pain following treatment is unknown. The objective of this case report was to (a) demonstrate that the C–E dimension was affected in the acute phase of neuropathic pain in cases of pain relapse, and (b) demonstrate the improvement process of the C–E dimension of pain. A woman was diagnosed with low back pain (LBP) and sciatica. The patient had previously experienced symptoms of LBP and sciatica; thus, this episode was a case of pain relapse. At the beginning of rehabilitation, the C–E dimension of pain was present in addition to the sensory–discriminative (S–D) dimension of pain. It was observed that improvement of the C–E dimension of pain was delayed in comparison with that of the S–D dimension of pain. The C–E dimension of pain was observed with pain relapse even though it was in the acute phase of pain. This case provides a novel insight into the C–E dimension of pain. Moreover, the delay in improving the C–E dimension of pain indicates a difference in the improvement process for each pain dimension.

Verbal and nonverbal cues as mediators of deception ability

1987 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald E. Riggio ◽  
Joan Tucker ◽  
Keith F. Widaman
Keyword(s):  
Nonverbal Cues

scholarly journals Cyber-Flirting: An Examination of Men's and Women's Flirting Behaviour Both Offline and on the Internet

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica T. Whitty
Keyword(s):  
Physical Attractiveness ◽  
The Body ◽  
Nonverbal Cues ◽  
Future Research ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Research Needs ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Online Interactions

AbstractWhile flirting is a relatively underresearched area within psychology, even less is known about how people cyber-flirt. This paper explores how often individuals flirt offline compared to online. Moreover, it attempts to examine how men and women flirt within these different spaces. Five thousand, six hundred and ninety-seven individuals, of which 3554 (62%) were women and 2143 (38%) were men, completed a survey about their flirting behaviour both in face-to-face interactions and in chatrooms. The first hypothesis, which stated that the body would be used to flirt with as frequently online as offline, was partly supported. However, it was found that individuals downplayed the importance of physical attractiveness online. Women flirted by displaying nonverbal signals (offline) or substitutes for nonverbal cues (online), to a greater extent than men. In chatrooms men were more likely than women to initiate contact. It is concluded that cyber-flirting is more than simply a meeting of minds and that future research needs to consider the role of the body in online interactions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document