Effects of L-alanine and L-alanine peptides on the chemotaxis of tetrahymena: Evolutionary conclusions

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 185-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Csaba ◽  
L. Kôhidai

L-alanine and its peptides (L-Ala-2–6) do not attract or repulse Tetrahymena in a 10−8M concentration. In 10−10M concentration there is a consistent repellent effect. Twenty four hours after L-alanine or L-alanine-peptides' pretreatment (imprinting) the progeny generation of the cells react differently to the same materials. L-Alanine, L-alanine penta- and hexapeptide in both concentrations are chemoattractant, while L-alanine tetrapeptide is repellent. L-Alanine dipeptide is inert in 10−10M and repellent at 10−8M concentrations, while L-alanine tripeptide is strongly repellent at 10−10M and attractant at 10−8M concentrations. This means, that the first encounter (imprinting) with an exogeneous amino acid or peptide is decisive to the later reaction of the protozoan cell. The chain length is important in the imprinting, however the reaction is not consistent. The experiments call the attention to the significance of imprinting in the receptor and hormone evolution.

Amino Acids ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 885-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsiou-Ting Kuo ◽  
Shing-Lung Liu ◽  
Wen-Chieh Chiu ◽  
Chun-Jen Fang ◽  
Hsien-Chen Chang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 577 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F.M. Luxford ◽  
Edward M. Milner ◽  
Naruo Yoshikawa ◽  
Chad Bullivant ◽  
Caroline E.H. Dessent

2011 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo O. Brito ◽  
Sandra G. Silva ◽  
Ricardo M.F. Fernandes ◽  
Eduardo F. Marques ◽  
José Enrique-Borges ◽  
...  

SynOpen ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 0059-0062
Author(s):  
Ikumi Otomo ◽  
Kanna Watanabe ◽  
Chiaki Kuroda ◽  
Kenichi Kobayashi

The reaction of five amphipathic-type thioesters, CH3(CH2) m COS(CH2) n COONa (m + n = 12), with cysteine hexyl, butyl, and ethyl esters were studied in aqueous medium. Compounds with the thioester group in close proximity to the carboxylate moiety (m = 10, n = 2) afforded amides in almost quantitative yield, whereas no reaction proceeded by using compounds with the thioester group distant from the carboxylate. In contrast, no clear difference in yield was observed among the five amphipathic-type thioesters upon reaction with valine hexyl ester. The results indicate that the reaction is affected by both the position of the thioester group and the hydrophilic/hydrophobic properties of the amino acid side chain.


FEBS Letters ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 453 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Hung Lin ◽  
Shao-Chen Lee ◽  
Payne Y. Chang ◽  
P.K. Rajan ◽  
Shih-Che Sue ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document