Determination of the exposed surface area of V2O5 on a V2O5/Al2O3 catalyst

1986 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Sobalik ◽  
V. Pour ◽  
L. A. Sokolova ◽  
O. V. Nevskaya ◽  
N. M. Popova
1983 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 719-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kinya Suzuki ◽  
Tadashi Hattori ◽  
Akira Miyamoto ◽  
Yuichi Murakami

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 340
Author(s):  
Sivaprakash Rajasekharan ◽  
Chris Vercruysse ◽  
Luc Martens ◽  
Ronald Verbeeck

The authors wish to make the following correction to the paper [...]


2021 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 141-151
Author(s):  
Johanna Pedersen ◽  
Tavs Nyord ◽  
Anders Feilberg ◽  
Rodrigo Labouriau ◽  
Derek Hunt ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Bedigrew ◽  
James A. Blair ◽  
Daniel R. Possley ◽  
Kevin L. Kirk ◽  
Joseph R. Hsu

The purpose of this study was to compare the exposure of the posterior facet with the extensile lateral (EL) approach compared with the sinus tarsi (ST) approach. We hypothesized that the ST approach will provide a similar exposure of the posterior calcaneal facet. A total of 8 sequential ST then EL approaches were performed on cadavers. Calcaneal landmarks were identified by visualization or palpation. Calibrated digital photographs of the posterior facet and lateral calcaneal body were obtained from standardized positions and used to calculate the exposed surface area. No significant difference was found in the average square area of the posterior facet exposed with the 2 approaches. Significantly more of the lateral calcaneal body was seen with the EL approach. Excluding the posterior facet superomedial quadrant, all the landmarks were visualized in 100% of approaches. The superomedial corner was visualized in significantly more of the cadavers with the EL approach and was palpable in 12.5% of the remaining cadavers in both approaches. Whereas the ST approach exposes less of the lateral wall of the calcaneus, it exposes similar amounts of the posterior facet when compared with the EL approach. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level V


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (53) ◽  
pp. 12256-12267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justus Heese‐Gärtlein ◽  
Dulce M. Morales ◽  
Anna Rabe ◽  
Thomas Bredow ◽  
Wolfgang Schuhmann ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 6113-6121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang Duan ◽  
Xiaofeng Wang ◽  
Tingting Tan ◽  
Mingqing Chen

The enhanced photocatalytic activity of BiOBr nanosheets depends on the large exposed surface areas of {001} facets (S{001}).


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Bai ◽  
Yongzheng Li ◽  
Qiuping Zhou ◽  
Jiaqi Xia ◽  
Min Wu ◽  
...  

AbstractEvidences have suggested that T cells that target mutation derived neoantigens are the main mediators of many effective cancer immunotherapies. Although algorithms have been used to predict neoantigens, only a handful of those are truly immunogenic. It is unclear which other factors influence neoantigen immunogenicity. Here, we classified clinical human neoantigen/neopeptide data based on their peptide-MHC binding events into three categories. We observed a conserved mutation orientation in anchor mutated neoantigen cohort after classification. By integrating this rule with existing prediction algorithm, we achieved improved performance of neoantigen prioritization. We solved several neoantigen/MHC structures, which showed that neoantigens which follow this rule can not only increase peptide-MHC binding affinity but create new TCR binding features. We also found neoantigen exposed surface area may lead to TCR bias in cancer immunotherapy. These evidences highlighted the value of immune-based classification during neoantigen study and enabled improved efficiency for cancer treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document