Acute and chronic effects of a new low molecular weight dermatan sulphate (Desmin 370) on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis in healthy subjects

1994 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Legnani ◽  
G. Palareti ◽  
R. Biagi ◽  
S. Ludovici ◽  
S. Coccheri ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Mayumi Yamamoto ◽  
Yuki Fujimoto ◽  
Shino Hayashi ◽  
Seiichi Hashida

Background For the early identification of patients at risk of developing diabetic nephropathy, we have developed an ultrasensitive immune complex transfer enzyme immunoassay to measure adiponectin in urine. Methods We developed immune complex transfer enzyme immunoassay for adiponectin and measured urinary adiponectin from 70 healthy subjects, 35 obese non-diabetic subjects and 20 patients with diabetes. Results The urinary adiponectin concentrations in patients with diabetes (3.3 ± 10.7 ng/mg creatinine) were significantly higher than those in obese subjects (0.54 ± 0.44; P < 0.01) and healthy subjects (0.46 ± 0.42; P < 0.001). The gel filtration elution profile of urine from healthy subjects showed traces of four immunoreactive peaks (high-, medium-, low-molecular weight and monomer molecules), despite the majority of blood adiponectin being high-molecular weight. However, urinary adiponectin molecules were more frequent in low-molecular weight as the estimate glomerular filtration rate decreased. Furthermore, as blood glucose concentrations rose, middle-molecular weight and high-molecular weight increased in urine. Further, urinary adiponectin concentrations correlated with estimate glomerular filtration rate ( r = −0.61, P < 0.001), but not urinary albumin. In addition, our analysis showed a significantly ( P < 0.001) higher value for urinary adiponectin in the G2 stage of chronic kidney disease classification where urinary albumin is not elevated. Conclusion Adiponectin increases in urine as renal function decreases, and urinary adiponectin may be useful as a surrogate marker for diabetic nephropathy risk.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7209-7209
Author(s):  
G. Scheuch ◽  
S. Haeussermann ◽  
P. Brand ◽  
C. Herpich ◽  
T. Meyer

7209 Background: Treatment with Heparin and low molecular weight (LMW) Heparin is frequently used in oncology settings. Usually, these drugs are delivered by subcutaneous (s.c.) administration. Since 1963, the clinical relevance of inhalation of unfractionated as well as LMW-Heparin has been investigated in various studies with over 500 subjects. In this study, a single inhalation of the LMW-Heparin Certoparin (Mono-Embolex, Novartis) was investigated in 10 healthy subjects. The goal was to assess the pharmacokinetic behavior. Inhalations were performed using a novel inhalation system, which allows an accurate dosing in the lungs by controlling patient’s breathing pattern (AKITA). Lung deposition is about 85% of the emitted dose. Methods: 10 non-smoking healthy subjects participated in this study. Inhalation of 9000 IU of LMW-Heparin was compared to 3000 IU s.c. administration to achieve factor-Xa-activity in the plasma of 0.2 to 0.3 U/ml. Intravenous blood samples were taken 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 48 hrs after administration. Factor-Xa-activity in plasma was assessed using the Berichrom assay (Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany). Results: Inhalation of LMW-Heparin was well tolerated and did not result in any side effects or changes in lung function. The maximum anti-Xa-activity in the plasma was 0.3 U/ml for the s.c. administration of Certoparin and 0.32 U/ml after inhalation of 9000 IU. However, pharmacokinetics was considerably different. Inhaled LMW-Heparin resulted in a prolonged anti-Xa-activity. After 6 (24) hours, the anti-Xa-activity after s.c. administration was down at 0.16 U/ml (0.10) and after inhalation at 0.30 (0.18) U/ml. Even after 48 hrs, the anti-Xa-activity after inhalation was significantly higher than the baseline value. Comparing area under the curve (AUC), bioavailability for the inhalation was 9.4 U · h/ml ± 14% compared to 5.7 U · h/ml ± 27% after s.c. administration. Conclusions: These results suggest that with controlled inhalation, this administration route is an attractive alternative to s.c. administration, with the result of longer bioavailability and less variability. A once daily administration is possible. Inhalation therapy with these kind of systems might also be useful with different anticancer agents, which cannot be administered orally. [Table: see text]


1995 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 203-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefán E. Matthíasson ◽  
Bengt Lindblad ◽  
Ulf Stjernquist ◽  
David Bergqvist

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document