Analysis of static axial load capacity of single piles and large diameter shafts using nonlinear load transfer curves

2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 285-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeong Joo Kim ◽  
Jose Leo C. Mission ◽  
Il Sang Park
Keyword(s):  
Axial Load ◽  
Load Transfer ◽  
Load Capacity ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Nonlinear Load ◽  
Axial Load Capacity ◽  
Single Piles

Axial load-capacity of rectangular cement stabilized rammed earth column

2015 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 402-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deb Dulal Tripura ◽  
Konjengbam Darunkumar Singh
Keyword(s):  
Axial Load ◽  
Load Capacity ◽  
Rammed Earth ◽  
Axial Load Capacity

Experimental Study of the Rotary Filling Piles with Large-Diameter under the Axial Load

2012 ◽  
Vol 594-597 ◽  
pp. 527-531
Author(s):  
Wan Qing Zhou ◽  
Shun Pei Ouyang
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Axial Load ◽  
Load Transfer ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Shaft Resistance ◽  
Tip Resistance ◽  
Soil Foundation ◽  
Soft Soil Foundation ◽  
Deep Soft Soil

Based on the experimental study of rotary filling piles with large diameter subjected to axial load in deep soft soil, the bearing capacity behavior and load transfer mechanism were discussed. Results show that in deep soft soil foundation, the super–long piles behave as end-bearing frictional piles. The exertion of the shaft resistance is not synchronized. The upper layer of soil is exerted prior to the lower part of soil. Meanwhile, the exertion of shaft resistance is prior to the tip resistance. For the different soil and the different depth of the same layer of soil, shaft resistance is different.

Axial load capacity of cylindrical shells with local geometric defects

1991 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Krishnakumar ◽  
C. G. Foster
Keyword(s):  
Axial Load ◽  
Load Capacity ◽  
Cylindrical Shells ◽  
Axial Load Capacity

EFFECT OF ASPECT RATIO ON THE BEHAVIOR OF GFRP-RC CIRCULAR COLUMNS UNDER SIMULATED SEISMIC LOADING

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Elsayed Mohammed Abdallah ◽  
Ehab Fathy El-Salakawy
Keyword(s):  
Aspect Ratio ◽  
Axial Load ◽  
Load Capacity ◽  
Load Level ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
Rc Columns ◽  
Drift Capacity ◽  
Glass Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Axial Load Capacity ◽  
Code Provisions

The mechanical and physical properties of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcement are different from steel, which requires independent code provisions for GFRP-reinforced concrete (RC) members. The currently available code provisions for GFRP-RC members still need more research evidence to be inclusive. For example, the available provisions for confinement reinforcement of FRP-RC columns do not consider the effects of column aspect ratio, which is not yet supported by any available research data. In this study, two full-scale spirally reinforced GFRP-RC circular columns were constructed and tested under concurrent seismic and axial loads. Both specimens had an aspect ratio (shear span-to-diameter ratio) of 7.0, while other two specimens with an aspect ratio of 5.0, from a previous stage of this study, were included for comparison purposes. For each aspect ratio, each specimen was loaded under one of two levels of axial load; 20 or 30% of the axial load capacity of the column section. All test specimens had a 35 MPa concrete compressive strength, 350-mm diameter, 85-mm spiral pitch and 1.2% longitudinal reinforcement ratio. The experimental results were analyzed in terms of hysteretic response, drift capacity and inelastic deformability hinge length. Based on the experimental results, it can be concluded that the aspect ratio affects the magnitude of secondary moments and inelastic deformability hinge length. In addition, the aspect ratio may affect drift capacity of GFRP-RC columns, depending on axial load level.

Instrumented load tests in mudstone: pile capacity and settlement prediction

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1254-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
J R Omer ◽  
R Delpak ◽  
R B Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Load Transfer ◽  
Load Capacity ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Soft Rock ◽  
Site Investigation ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Vertical Loading ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Pile Design ◽  
Load Tests

The present work stems from the design of a viaduct in South Wales, U.K., where full-scale pile testing was carried out to assess whether the proposed design methods would meet the required load capacity and settlement criteria for the working piles. Five fully instrumented large diameter bored cast in situ piles, up to 30 m deep, were installed in weathered mudstone and tested under vertical loading. A sixth pile, which had no shaft instrumentation, was formed with a voided toe. In conjunction with vast soil data from 218 site investigation boreholes, the extensive data produced from the load tests were analyzed to quantify the key parameters considered to influence load transfer and settlement behaviour. Each pile was first calibrated using four methods to establish the as-built stiffness, taking into account the nonlinearity of concrete and the effect of partial steel encasement. It is demonstrated that the current national norms for bored pile design in cohesive soil – soft rock are overconservative for South Wales ground conditions. To ameliorate this, alternative methods are proposed, which lead to improved reliability and accuracy in shaft and base capacity assessment. In addition, a numerical model is developed that can be used to predict the complete load-settlement variation up to the ultimate state. The model is sufficiently expounded to allow its immediate application in pile design by geotechnical engineers.Key words: piled foundations, load tests, bearing capacity and settlement, Mercia mudstone.

Magnetic Field and Specific Axial Load Capacity of Hybrid Magnetic Bearing

2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 4911-4917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haoze Wang ◽  
Kun Liu ◽  
Peng Ao
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Axial Load ◽  
Load Capacity ◽  
Magnetic Bearing ◽  
Axial Load Capacity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document