Sudbury meteorite-impact structure modeling with LITHOPROBE high-resolution seismic refraction results

1998 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-36
Author(s):  
Wooil M. Moon ◽  
L. X. Jiao
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-162
Author(s):  
B Butchibabu ◽  
Prosanta Kumar Khan ◽  
P C Jha

Abstract This study aims for the protection of a crude-oil pipeline, buried at a shallow depth, against a probable environmental hazard and pilferage. Both surface and borehole geophysical techniques such as electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), ground penetrating radar (GPR), surface seismic refraction tomography (SRT), cross-hole seismic tomography (CST) and cross-hole seismic profiling (CSP) were used to map the vulnerable zones. Data were acquired using ERT, GPR and SRT along the pipeline for a length of 750 m, and across the pipeline for a length of 4096 m (over 16 profiles of ERT and SRT with a separation of 50 m) for high-resolution imaging of the near-surface features. Borehole techniques, based on six CSP and three CST, were carried out at potentially vulnerable locations up to a depth of 30 m to complement the surface mapping with high-resolution imaging of deeper features. The ERT results revealed the presence of voids or cavities below the pipeline. A major weak zone was identified at the central part of the study area extending significantly deep into the subsurface. CSP and CST results also confirmed the presence of weak zones below the pipeline. The integrated geophysical investigations helped to detect the old workings and a deformation zone in the overburden. These features near the pipeline produced instability leading to deformation in the overburden, and led to subsidence in close vicinity of the concerned area. The area for imminent subsidence, proposed based on the results of the present comprehensive geophysical investigations, was found critical for the pipeline.


Nature ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 217 (5127) ◽  
pp. 438-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
NILS-BERTIL SVENSSON

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 495-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. O. A. Robertsson ◽  
K. Holliger ◽  
A. G. Green ◽  
A. Pugin ◽  
R. De Iaco

2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 793-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hernan UGALDE ◽  
William A. MORRIS ◽  
Christina CLARK ◽  
Brett MILES ◽  
Bernd MILKEREIT

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Timmons M. Erickson ◽  
Christopher L. Kirkland ◽  
Nicholas E. Timms ◽  
Aaron J. Cavosie ◽  
Thomas M. Davison

2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (9) ◽  
pp. 1284-1296 ◽  
Author(s):  
FuYun Wang ◽  
YongHong Duan ◽  
ZhuoXin Yang ◽  
ChengKe Zhang ◽  
JinRen Zhao ◽  
...  

Meteoritics ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bevan M. French ◽  
Ernest H. Muller ◽  
Peter L. Ward

2011 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
pp. 2794-2812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianing Li ◽  
Robert Abel ◽  
Kai Zhu ◽  
Yixiang Cao ◽  
Suwen Zhao ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel Mader ◽  
Adam Pecina ◽  
Petr Cígler ◽  
Martin Lepšík ◽  
Václav Šícha ◽  
...  

Carborane-based compounds are promising lead structures for development of inhibitors of carbonic anhydrases (CAs). Here, we report structural and computational analysis applicable to structure-based design of carborane compounds with selectivity toward the cancer-specific CAIX isoenzyme. We determined the crystal structure of CAII in complex with 1-methylenesulfamide-1,2-dicarba-closo-dodecaborane at 1.0 Å resolution and used this structure to model the 1-methylenesulfamide-1,2-dicarba-closo-dodecaborane interactions with CAIX. A virtual glycine scan revealed the contributions of individual residues to the energy of binding of 1-methylenesulfamide-1,2-dicarba-closo-dodecaborane to CAII and CAIX, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document