scholarly journals Continuous mandibular nerve block for pain relief. A report of two cases

2002 ◽  
Vol 49 (9) ◽  
pp. 951-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baljit Singh ◽  
Vinay Bhardwaj
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Mandibular Nerve

scholarly journals Mandibular Nerve Block for Long-Term Pain Relief in a Case of Refractory Burning Mouth Syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 345-347
Author(s):  
Hisham Kassem ◽  
Lucien Alexandre ◽  
Ivan Urits ◽  
Alan D. Kaye ◽  
Omar Viswanath
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Burning Mouth Syndrome ◽  
Mandibular Nerve ◽  
Burning Mouth

scholarly journals Mandibular nerve block for peri-operative pain relief using a peripheral nerve stimulator

Anaesthesia ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Kumar ◽  
S. Shashni ◽  
R. Singh ◽  
A. Jain
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Mandibular Nerve ◽  
Nerve Stimulator ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Stimulator

scholarly journals Post operative pain relief through intermittent mandibular nerve block

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pramendra Agrawal ◽  
Chhavi Sawhney ◽  
KapilDev Soni
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Mandibular Nerve ◽  
Post Operative Pain

Assessment of Knowledge and Practice of Fresh Dental Graduates, Dental Surgeons and Specialists of Multan about Different LA Techniques for Mandibular Teeth: A cross-sectional survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1745-1748
Author(s):  
Zaid Bin Sohail ◽  
Muhammad Salman Chishty ◽  
M. Shairaz Sadiq ◽  
Farhan Riaz ◽  
Mehwish Munawar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Block ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Mandibular Nerve ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Dental Procedures ◽  
Dental Practitioners

Objective: To assess the knowledge about different mandibular nerve block techniques of fresh dental graduates, dental surgeons and specialists to attain mandibular nerve block for dental treatment in Multan. Design of the Study: It was a cross-sectional survey. Study Settings: This study was carried out at Department of Dentistry at Multan Medical & Dental College, Nishtar Institute of dentistry (Nishtar Medical University) and Bakhtawer Amin Dental College from August 2019 to August 2020. Material and Methods: The study involved 220 respondents. The questionnaire was administered to fresh dental graduates (house officers) and dental surgeons in 3 dental colleges of Multan, and was collected on the same day. House officers who did not return the forms were reminded personally and contacted on the phone thrice over the following week. Results of the Study: The frequency of respondants who could administer Gow-Gates without supervison was 20.9% (n=46). Participants from NID, Multan had the highest frequency (35.3%) with the lowest in BIMDC (16.6%)and MMDC(20.6%). The differences were non-significant (p=0.19). Significantly higher frequency of male respondants (10%, n=22) claimed they could administer Gow-Gates without supervison compared to female respondants (5.4%, n=12, p=0.012, Chi-Square). Training for Gow-Gates had been received by 12.7% (n=28) of the House Officers and dental surgeons. The Highest frequency of training was in NID, Multan (5.4%, n= 12, p= 0.016, chi-square). Conclusion: The majority of the dental practitioners of Multan used IANB as their primary LA technique and intraligamental injections as a supplemental LA technique in their clinics to attain mandibular molars anesthesia for general dental procedures like fillings, root canals and extractions. Keywords: Mandibular local anesthesia, Inferior alveolar nerve block, Gow-Gates technique

The use of mandibular nerve block to predict safe anaesthetic induction in patients with acute trismus*

Anaesthesia ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 64 (11) ◽  
pp. 1196-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. B. Heard ◽  
R. J. Green ◽  
D. A. Lacquiere ◽  
P. Sillifant
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Block ◽  
Mandibular Nerve ◽  
Anaesthetic Induction

scholarly journals Repetitive paravertebral nerve block using a catheter technique for pain relief in post-herpetic neuralgia

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z.M. Naja ◽  
H Maaliki ◽  
M.A. Al-Tannir ◽  
M El-Rajab ◽  
F Ziade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Post Herpetic Neuralgia ◽  
Catheter Technique

scholarly journals Combination Therapy with Continuous Three-in-One Femoral Nerve Block and Periarticular Multimodal Drug Infiltration after Total Hip Arthroplasty

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomonori Tetsunaga ◽  
Tomoko Tetsunaga ◽  
Kazuo Fujiwara ◽  
Hirosuke Endo ◽  
Toshifumi Ozaki
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Nerve Block ◽  
Femoral Nerve ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay

Background. Various postoperative pain relief modalities, including continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB), local infiltration analgesia (LIA), and combination therapy, have been reported for total knee arthroplasty. However, no studies have compared CFNB with LIA for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of CFNB versus LIA after THA. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the postoperative outcomes of 93 THA patients (20 men, 73 women; mean age 69.2 years). Patients were divided into three groups according to postoperative analgesic technique: CFNB, LIA, or combined CFNB+LIA. We measured the following postoperative outcome parameters: visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at rest, supplemental analgesia, side effects, mobilization, length of hospital stay, and Harris Hip Score (HHS). Results. The CFNB+LIA group had significantly lower VAS pain scores than the CFNB and LIA groups on postoperative day 1. There were no significant differences among the three groups in use of supplemental analgesia, side effects, mobilization, length of hospital stay, or HHS at 3 months after THA. Conclusions. Although there were no clinically significant differences in outcomes among the three groups, combination therapy with CFNB and LIA provided better pain relief after THA than CFNB or LIA alone, with few side effects.

scholarly journals Combined popliteal and saphenous nerve block vs NSAIDS for post operative analgesia in below knee surgery patients: A cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 556-560
Author(s):  
Amrita Gupta ◽  
Shanu Maheshwari ◽  
Avanish Kumar Saxena ◽  
Sukhdev Mishra ◽  
Aviral Pandey
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Saphenous Nerve ◽  
Knee Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Pain Relief ◽  
Ratio Test ◽  
Type I ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Rescue Analgesia

Peripheral nerve blocks are becoming increasingly popular to control postoperative pain in orthopaedic limb surgeries. An outstanding feature of nerve block is its lack of adverse effects, reduced requirement of analgesics and better patient satisfaction. To compare the efficacy of combined popliteal and saphenous nerve block with NSAIDS for postoperative pain relief in below knee surgery patients. We performed a prospective randomized study involving seventy patients. All patients underwent an elective orthopaedic procedure below knee under spinal anaesthesia. Thirty five patients had received a combined popliteal and saphenous nerve block and the rest thirty-five received intravenous NSAIDS at the end of surgical procedure. Post operative VAS Score, time for first rescue analgesia, total diclofenac requirement, total anti-emetic requirement and complications if any were noted.: The statistical power of sample was 80% and type I error (α) of 0.05. The distribution of the data was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For data with a non-normal distribution, the Mann-Whitney U test was used in intergroup comparisons. The data were expressed as the median, minimum and maximum (min-max). For comparison of postoperative analgesic use, the chi-square test was used, and complication rates were compared using a cross-ratio test. P-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant in all the analyses.: Patients with a combined popliteal and saphenous nerve block had significantly less pain at six hours, twelve hours and twenty four hours (p value <0.001) postoperatively. Time for request of rescue analgesia was prolonged. Total diclofenac and anti emetic requirement was also reduced. Also higher level of satisfaction was achieved among this group of patients. : A combined popliteal and saphenous nerve block provides significantly better postoperative pain relief than NSAIDS in patients who underwent below knee surgeries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document