Modelling surplus canal water releases for artificial recharge of groundwater through surface drainage systems

2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D. Khepar ◽  
A. K. Yadav ◽  
S. K. Sondhi ◽  
Arpan Sherring
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 7189
Author(s):  
Beniamino Russo ◽  
Manuel Gómez Valentín ◽  
Jackson Tellez-Álvarez

Urban drainage networks should be designed and operated preferably under open channel flow conditions without flux return, backwater, or overflows. In the case of extreme storm events, urban pluvial flooding is generated by the excess of surface runoff that could not be conveyed by pressurized sewer pipes, due to its limited capacity or, many times, due to the poor efficiency of surface drainage systems to collect uncontrolled overland flow. Generally, the hydraulic design of sewer systems is addressed more for underground networks, neglecting the surface drainage system, although inadequate inlet spacings and locations can cause dangerous flooding with relevant socio-economic impacts and the interruption of critical services and urban activities. Several experimental and numerical studies carried out at the Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) and other research institutions demonstrated that the hydraulic efficiency of inlets can be very low under critical conditions (e.g., high circulating overland flow on steep areas). In these cases, the hydraulic efficiency of conventional grated inlets and continuous transverse elements can be around 10–20%. Their hydraulic capacity, expressed in terms of discharge coefficients, shows the same criticism with values quite far from those that are usually used in several project practice phases. The grate clogging phenomenon and more intense storm events produced by climate change could further reduce the inlets’ performance. In this context, in order to improve the flood urban resilience of our cities, the relevance of the hydraulic behavior of surface drainage systems is clear.


1965 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-407
Author(s):  
Ghulam Mohammad

Most of the points raised by the Panel members, Drs. Roger Revile, Harold Thomas and Robert Dorfman, have been answered in the comment by Dr. Frank M. Eaton. Dr. Nazir Ahmad has further elaborated some of the issues involved. The author will confine his remarks to two basic issues, namely, pumping of water for irrigation purposes in the non-saline high quality ground¬water areas in the Northern Zone of the Indus Plain and provision of horizontal sub-surface drainage facilities in areas where the groundwaters are saline and unfit for irrigation use. The author is happy to note that the Panel members acknowledge the significant contribution made by private tubewells to the productivity of agri¬culture in West Pakistan. The author agrees with the Panel members that private tubewells will be developed mainly in areas that have adequate supplies of high quality groundwater and not in areas where the groundwater is too saline to be applied to land without dilution with canal water. Ina previous article, the author proposed that horizontal sub-surface drain¬age facilities should be provided in the saline groundwater areas [5, pp.387-395]. The Panel members do not agree with this and propose instead deep tubewells for irrigation as well as for drainage purposes. They suggest that with the use of deep tubewells and canal water the salt be flushed out of the root zone and washed downward with recycled pumped water to be stored underground.


1991 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-142
Author(s):  
P. R. Simpson ◽  
W. M. Edmunds ◽  
N. Breward ◽  
D. Flight ◽  
P. Green ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Berthelot Curtis ◽  
Roberto Soares ◽  
Diana Podborochynski ◽  
Rielle Haichert ◽  
Duane Guenther

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document