Iopentol (Imagopaque® 350) compared with iohexol (Omnipaque® 350) in pediatric cardioangiography A clinical trial assessing adverse events, ECG, blood pressure and diagnostic information

1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (S4) ◽  
pp. S123-S126
Author(s):  
M. Kunnen ◽  
D. De Greef ◽  
K. Skinningsrud
1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (S4) ◽  
pp. S127-S130
Author(s):  
J. F. Piéchaud ◽  
L. Iserin ◽  
Y. Aggoun ◽  
J. Kachaner ◽  
K. Skinningsrud

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dora Koller ◽  
Susana Almenara ◽  
Gina Mejia ◽  
Miriam Saiz-Rodriguez ◽  
Pablo Zubiaur ◽  
...  

Objective: To assess adverse events and safety of aripiprazole and olanzapine treatment. Methods: Twenty-four healthy volunteers receiving 5 daily oral doses of 10 mg aripiprazole and 5 mg olanzapine in a crossover clinical trial were genotyped for 46 polymorphisms in 14 genes by qPCR. Drug plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC-MS/MS. Blood pressure and 12-lead ECG were measured in supine position. Adverse events were also recorded. Results: Aripiprazole decreased diastolic blood pressure on the first day and decreased QTc on the third and fifth day. Olanzapine had a systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and QTc lowering effect on the first day. Polymorphisms in ADRA2A, COMT, DRD3 and HTR2A genes were significantly associated to these changes. The most frequent adverse drug reactions to aripiprazole were somnolence, headache, insomnia, dizziness, restlessness, palpitations, akathisia and nausea while were somnolence, dizziness, asthenia, constipation, dry mouth, headache and nausea to olanzapine. Additionally, HTR2A, HTR2C, DRD2, DRD3, OPRM1, UGT1A1 and CYP1A2 polymorphisms had a role in the development of adverse drug reactions. Conclusions: Olanzapine induced more cardiovascular changes; however, more adverse drug reactions were registered to aripiprazole. In addition, some polymorphisms may explain the difference in the incidence of these effects among subjects.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Lisha Mu ◽  
Huakun Rao ◽  
Yangfeng Wu ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
...  

At present, the effect of substitute salt in reducing sodium intake and blood pressure is relatively clear. The present study is a phase I clinical trial involving 43 hypertensives in which the effect of 18% sodium substitute salt on the home blood pressure variability (BPV) was observed for 8 weeks with weekly follow-up. Finally, 4 patients were lost, and 39 patients completed the intervention and were included in the analysis. Daily home blood pressure and weekly adverse events were collected. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) in the morning (−10.0 mmHg, 95% CI: −16.5 to −3.5, P  = 0.003), SBP at night (−10.2 mmHg, 95% CI: −16.1 to −4.3, P  = 0.001), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at night (−4.0 mmHg, 95% CI: −7.1 to −0.8, P  = 0.014) decreased significantly. Also, there was no statistically significant change in morning (F = 1.137, P  = 0.352) and night diastolic (F = 0.344, P  = 0.481) BPV and morning systolic BPV (F = 0.663, P  = 0.930) over time during the intervention period, except for that night systolic BPV had a downward trend (F = 2.778, P  = 0.016) and had decreased 2.04 mmHg (95% CI: 0.84 to 3.23, P  = 0.001) after intervention. The use of 18% of the substitute salt did not increase BPV during the intervention and even may decrease it, which indicates its control effects on blood pressure. This study is the first one to observe the effect of 18% sodium substitute salt on the home blood pressure variability, providing a basis for further experiments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document