The Merensky Cyclic Unit and its impact on footwall cumulates below Normal and Regional Pothole reef types in the Western Bushveld Complex

2006 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. Roberts ◽  
D. L. Reid ◽  
J. A. Miller ◽  
I. J. Basson ◽  
M. Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1363-1380
Author(s):  
Jarlen J. Keet ◽  
Frederick Roelofse ◽  
Christoph D.K. Gauert ◽  
Danie Grobler ◽  
Mike Butler

ABSTRACT The Flatreef, a down-dip, sub-horizontal extension of the Platreef, which underlies the Turfspruit and Macalacaskop farms, represents the future of platinum mining in South Africa. The stratigraphic connection between the Platreef, located at the base of the northern limb of the Bushveld Complex, and the Merensky Reef in the western and eastern limbs of the complex, was disputed for many years due to the heterogeneous nature of the Platreef along strike. However, the discovery of the Flatreef led to a new perspective on the Platreef as the former allowed for the study of a magmatic stratigraphy less affected by footwall interaction. Here, we report whole-rock S isotope (δ34S) compositions across the stratigraphic units of the Flatreef and its footwall and hanging wall as intersected by boreholes UMT-276 and UMT-393, as well as stratigraphic units of the Merensky Reef at Two Rivers Platinum mine in the eastern limb. The units of the Flatreef containing platinum group element mineralization, namely the Main Reef and Upper Reef, have δ34S values that overlap with the range recorded for the Merensky Reef in the western and eastern limbs. In UMT-393, Main Reef δ34S values range between 0.2 and 1.5‰ (with the exception of three outliers, 9.7‰, 11.1‰, and 7.9‰), and 0.52‰ and 11.2‰ for two Upper Reef samples. However, in UMT-276, Main Reef δ34S values range between –0.96 and 2.24‰ and 3.19‰ was recorded for an Upper Reef sample. The S isotope compositions recorded for the Merensky Reef pyroxenite at Two Rivers Platinum mine are relatively higher with δ34S values ranging between 1.24 and 4.83‰. The top unit of the Flatreef, which is a transition zone below the Main Zone, as well as the Footwall Cyclic Unit have heavier S isotope compositions with δ34S values ranging between 6 and 17‰ for the former and 0.7 and 18.6‰ for the latter. At Two Rivers Platinum mine, the hanging-wall anorthosite has a δ34S value of 2.9‰ in contrast to the 5.7‰ measured for the footwall anorthosite and 3.27‰ for the footwall feldspathic pyroxenite. The consistent near-mantle S isotope signature and accompanying metal enrichment in the Main Reef of the Flatreef may be explained by extensive interaction of sulfide minerals in a Lower Zone conduit/pre-Platreef staging chamber with large volumes of uncontaminated magma. The δ34S values of the Merensky Reef at Two Rivers Platinum mine are slightly higher compared to that of the Main Reef at Turfspruit and Macalacaskop possibly due to interaction with underlying carbonate rocks.


2006 ◽  
Vol 70 (18) ◽  
pp. A524
Author(s):  
D.L. Reid ◽  
M.D. Roberts ◽  
J.A. Miller ◽  
I.J. Basson ◽  
M. Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Nature ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 298 (5869) ◽  
pp. 53-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. J. Kruger ◽  
J. S. Marsh
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Tapster ◽  
Iain McDonald ◽  
Dave Holwell ◽  
Danie Grobler

<p>Models for the formation of the Rustenberg Layered Suite of the Bushveld Igneous Complex continue to be debated. The consensus timescale over which magmatism took place has reduced hand in hand with advancements in geochronological techniques and data precision. The most recent studies by double spiked (<sup>202</sup>Pb-<sup>205</sup>Pb) zircon CA-ID-TIMS U-Pb have indicated emplacement in less than 1 Myrs [1][2]. Increasing analytical precision has also seemingly permitted individual magmatic layers to be resolved, leading to the “out of sequence sill” emplacement model [2], albeit contested [3].</p><p>We present two new high-precision zircon dates obtained from two continuous core intervals collected  <4m apart in a single Ni-Cu-PGE rich pyroxenite unit in the Turfspruit section of the Platreef, Northern Limb of the Bushveld Complex [4]. Grobler et al. [5] correlate this pyroxenite with the Merensky Cyclic Unit of the Upper Critical Zone in eastern and western limbs. Assuming the recommended zircon <sup>238</sup>U/<sup>235</sup>U of Hiess et al. [6] without uncertainties propagated as per previous studies e.g. [1][2], the age interpretations of these two samples define a minimum and maximum temporal interval between 1.01 ±0.16 Myrs and 1.28 ±0.22 Myrs that brackets, or overlaps with, the entirety of previous dates from all preceding studies. The pyroxenite is continuous, without intrusive contacts, and the stratigraphically lower sample produces an apparently younger zircon age than the overlying sample.  It seems highly unlikely the entire longevity of the Bushveld’s magmatic evolution was apparently captured within this 4 m section. Therefore, it now seems highly improbable that the Bushveld was emplaced and cooled in less than 1 Myrs, as the current paradigm states [1].</p><p>The older date from the Platreef now aligns the isotopic age relationships with the field observations of the overlying Main Zone, in contrast to the interpretation of Mungall et al. [2]. The new dates alone neither support nor contradicts the “out of sequence” sill emplacement model. Rather they merely indicate that melt related process that crystallised zircon was protracted within narrow vertical intervals, and that future work should acknowledge this potential complexity. It raises questions which age of event(s) introduced or modified sulfides within the ore bearing horizon. This requires greater integration of the geochronological record with ore textures at a high sampling density.</p><p>However, there also remains a substantial, yet previously overlooked caveat to all geochronological interpretations presented thus far; “out of sequence” sills in particular. This caveat is that the variations in the <sup>238</sup>U/<sup>235</sup>U between samples over observed magnitudes of variations in zircon [4] could account for any offsets in <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>206</sup>Pb dates interpreted as real temporal differences. This issue remains to be tested.</p><p>References:</p><p>[1] Zeh A et al. (2015) EPSL 418:103-114; [2] Mungall J et al. (2016) Nat. Coms. 13385; [3] Latypov R et al. (2017) South African Jour of Geol. 120.4, 565-574; [4] Nodder SM (2015) MESci dissertation, Cardiff University, 257pp; [5] Grobler D et al. (2019) Min Dep 54, 3-28; [6] Hiess J et al. (2012) Science 418,103-114</p>


2002 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 881-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Cawthorn

Abstract The Upper Critical Zone of the Bushveld Complex consists of several cyclic units, each ranging from ultramafic to leucocratic. One view is that they were initiated by addition of, and crystallization from, relatively magnesian magma. Experimental studies on plausible parental magma compositions to this sequence show that plagioclase joins orthopyroxene in the crystallization sequence once the Mg# of the orthopyroxene has decreased below 83. Some norites from the Upper Critical Zone contain orthopyroxene with this Mg#, supporting the validity of the experimental studies. There are no orthopyroxene compositions with higher Mg# than 83 in the entire Upper Critical Zone in either the eastern or western limbs of the Bushveld Complex. This observation suggests that all these rocks formed from plagioclase-saturated magmas. If this interpretation is correct, pyroxenites in this succession are not the result of crystallization from a magnesian magma. Instead, they result from the mechanical separation of plagioclase and orthopyroxene, probably due to crystal sorting during settling, from a magma lying at the cotectic for these two minerals. Rocks exist in the Upper Critical Zone that contain non-cotectic proportions of cumulus plagioclase and orthopyroxene, again supporting models of crystal sorting during settling. In such a model, anorthosites result from the delayed accumulation of plagioclase relative to pyroxene, and not to formation from a magma saturated only in plagioclase. When traced from northwest to southeast in the western limb, there is a change in the relative proportions of plagioclase to orthopyroxene in the Upper Group 2 chromitite cyclic unit. In the northwest the unit is dominated by ultramafic rocks. In the southeast the plagioclase to pyroxene ratio exceeds that of the cotectic proportion, relations that may result from the lateral transport of suspended plagioclase grains to the southeast.


Minerals ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Hunt ◽  
Rais Latypov ◽  
Péter Horváth

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (4) ◽  
pp. 655-668
Author(s):  
N. Lenhardt ◽  
W. Altermann ◽  
F. Humbert ◽  
M. de Kock

Abstract The Palaeoproterozoic Hekpoort Formation of the Pretoria Group is a lava-dominated unit that has a basin-wide extent throughout the Transvaal sub-basin of South Africa. Additional correlative units may be present in the Kanye sub-basin of Botswana. The key characteristic of the formation is its general geochemical uniformity. Volcaniclastic and other sedimentary rocks are relatively rare throughout the succession but may be dominant in some locations. Hekpoort Formation outcrops are sporadic throughout the basin and mostly occur in the form of gentle hills and valleys, mainly encircling Archaean domes and the Palaeoproterozoic Bushveld Complex (BC). The unit is exposed in the western Pretoria Group basin, sitting unconformably either on the Timeball Hill Formation or Boshoek Formation, which is lenticular there, and on top of the Boshoek Formation in the east of the basin. The unit is unconformably overlain by the Dwaalheuwel Formation. The type-locality for the Hekpoort Formation is the Hekpoort farm (504 IQ Hekpoort), ca. 60 km to the west-southwest of Pretoria. However, no stratotype has ever been proposed. A lectostratotype, i.e., the Mooikloof area in Pretoria East, that can be enhanced by two reference stratotypes are proposed herein. The Hekpoort Formation was deposited in a cratonic subaerial setting, forming a large igneous province (LIP) in which short-termed localised ponds and small braided river systems existed. It therefore forms one of the major Palaeoproterozoic magmatic events on the Kaapvaal Craton.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Setera ◽  
◽  
Jill VanTongeren ◽  
Brent Turrin ◽  
Carl Swisher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document