Are there differences in the return to work process for work-related psychological and musculoskeletal injuries? A longitudinal path analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 1041-1051
Author(s):  
Peter Smith ◽  
Anthony D. LaMontagne ◽  
Rebbecca Lilley ◽  
Sheilah Hogg-Johnson ◽  
Malcolm Sim
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte L. Brakenridge ◽  
Elise M. Gane ◽  
Esther J. Smits ◽  
Nicole E. Andrews ◽  
Venerina Johnston

Abstract Background Musculoskeletal injuries are the most common non-fatal injury from road traffic crashes. Even when the injuries are mild, they can cause pain which can affect return to work rates and work ability post-crash. Workplace output losses are the biggest cost from traffic crash-related injuries. There is a need to identify effective interventions that can improve work-related outcomes (e.g. time to return to work, sick leave, and work ability) in this group and a need to understand the intervention components, external factors, and participant characteristics that may be associated with improvement. Methods A systematic review will be conducted using seven databases and search terms related to road traffic crash, musculoskeletal injury, work-related outcomes, and study design. Intervention studies will be eligible if they report on at least one work-related outcome, include adults with a traffic crash-related musculoskeletal injury (e.g. fracture or whiplash), include a comparison group, and are written in English. Interventions can be medical, therapeutic, work-based, multicomponent, or other. Two researchers will independently screen titles and abstracts, review full texts for inclusion in the review, and perform the data extraction. The main outcomes of the review will be time until return to work and duration of sick leave. The results will be narratively described, with meta-analyses conducted where possible. Discussion This review will explore the effectiveness of interventions in individuals with traffic crash-related musculoskeletal injury on work-related outcomes and will act as a useful source for researchers, policy makers, and stakeholders when developing and implementing interventions in this group. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018103746


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 3007-3015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anneke Ullrich ◽  
Hilke M. Rath ◽  
Ullrich Otto ◽  
Christa Kerschgens ◽  
Martin Raida ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (4) ◽  
pp. e158
Author(s):  
Sherise Epstein ◽  
Bao Ngoc N. Tran ◽  
Qing Z. Ruan ◽  
Dhruv Singhal ◽  
Bernard T. Lee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document