RETRACTED ARTICLE: Influence of different volume replacement strategies on inflammation and endothelial activation in the elderly undergoing major abdominal surgery

2004 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Boldt ◽  
Michael Ducke ◽  
Bernhard Kumle ◽  
Michael Papsdorf ◽  
Ernst-Ludwig Zurmeyer
Author(s):  
Chris Dodds ◽  
Chandra M. Kumar ◽  
Frédérique Servin

Major abdominal surgery and laparotomy are common procedures that are associated with a high risk of mortality and morbidity, especially in the elderly. Outcomes can be improved by formal risk stratification, appropriate perioperative resuscitation and optimization, early surgery, senior anaesthetist involvement, and careful postoperative critical. Assessment of dehydration is imperative because fluid losses are very common and may be difficult to measure. Hypothermia is common, and measures should be instituted to conserve heat loss. Use of nitrous oxide can cause bowel distension and should be avoided. Elderly patients should receive postoperative care in an environment that is appropriate to the degree of comorbidity and the type of surgery. Effective analgesia is known to improve outcome. Only experienced anaesthetists should manage major and emergency abdominal surgery.


2000 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 433-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude Mann ◽  
Yvan Pouzeratte ◽  
Gilles Boccara ◽  
Christophe Peccoux ◽  
Christine Vergne ◽  
...  

Background Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), using an opioid either alone or in combination with a local anesthetic, are two major advances in the management of pain after major surgery. However, these techniques have been evaluated poorly in elderly people. This prospective, randomized study compared the effectiveness on postoperative pain and safety of PCEA and PCA after major abdominal surgery in the elderly patient. Methods Seventy patients older than 70 yr of age and undergoing major abdominal surgery were assigned randomly to receive either combined epidural analgesia and general anesthesia followed by postoperative PCEA, using a mixture of 0.125% bupivacaine and sufentanil (PCEA group), or general anesthesia followed by PCA with intravenous morphine (PCA group). Pain intensity was tested three times daily using a visual analog scale. Postoperative evaluation included mental status, cardiorespiratory and gastrointestinal functions, and patient satisfaction scores. Results Pain relief was better at rest (P = 0.001) and after coughing (P = 0.002) in the PCEA group during the 5 postoperative days. Satisfaction scores were better in the PCEA group. Although incidence of delirium was comparable in the PCA and PCEA groups (24% vs. 26%, respectively), mental status was improved on the fourth and fifth postoperative days in the PCEA group. The PCEA group recovered bowel function more quickly than did the PCA group. Cardiopulmonary complications were similar in the two groups. Conclusion After major abdominal surgery in the elderly patient, patient-controlled analgesia, regardless of the route (epidural or parenteral), is effective. The epidural route using local anesthetics and an opioid provides better pain relief and improves mental status and bowel activity.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Xiang Tan ◽  
Miny Samuel ◽  
Ning Qi Pang

Abstract Introduction Multimodal prehabilitation has been touted as a potential strategy to better prepare our elderly and frail patients for major surgery. While randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews have been done to investigate the effect of prehabilitation on various surgical cohorts, most of these studies have focused on single modality prehabilitation and without an emphasis on the elderly. This systematic review aims to assess the effect of a multimodal prehabilitation program on elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. MethodsThis protocol has been written according to the PRISMA-P statement and is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO registration number 250281). MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PsychINFO databases will be searched. Only randomized controlled trials with an average study population age ≥65 that has undergone major abdominal operation with at least two components (physical, nutritional, psychological) of prehabilitation will be included. Clinical outcomes that will be collected include post-operative morbidity and mortality, length of stay, 30-day readmission and peri-operative 6-minute walking distance. The risk of bias in included studies will be assessed. Data will be pooled where possible. DiscussionThis systematic review will evaluate and establish the effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation for the elderly, who represents the group of patients most likely to benefit from prehabilitation. This review with its focus on the elderly will provide us with fresh insight into the utility of prehabilitation that will better inform policy makers in its implementation.PROSPERO Registration: On 20/04/2021, ID 250281


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document