Electromagnetic-structural analysis and improved loose coupling method in electromagnetic forming process

2016 ◽  
Vol 89 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 701-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Qiu ◽  
Yao Xiao ◽  
Changzheng Deng ◽  
Zhenxing Li ◽  
Yihui Xu ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 140-151
Author(s):  
Quanliang Cao ◽  
Xian Li ◽  
Zhenhao Li ◽  
Limeng Du ◽  
Liangyu Xia ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 166 ◽  
pp. 773-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abderrahmen Aridhi ◽  
Makrem Arfaoui ◽  
Tarek Mabrouki ◽  
Naim Naouar ◽  
Yvan Denis ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 2809-2815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Min Tak ◽  
Han-Bin Kang ◽  
In-Seok Baek ◽  
Seok-Soon Lee

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 171-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiren Xiong ◽  
Wenping Wang ◽  
Min Wan ◽  
Xinjun Li

1999 ◽  
Vol 601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn S. Daehn ◽  
Vincent J. Vohnout ◽  
Subrangshu Datta

AbstractThis paper has two distinct goals. First, we argue in an extended introduction that high velocity forming, as can be implemented through electromagnetic forming, is a technology that should be developed. As a process used in conjunction with traditional stamping, it may offer dramatically improved formability, reduced wrinkling and active control of springback among other advantages. In the body of the paper we describe the important factors that lead to improved formability at high velocity. In particular, high sample velocity can inhibit neck growth. There is a sample size dependence where larger samples have better ductility than those of smaller dimensions. These aspects are at least partially described by the recent model of Freund and Shenoy. In addition to this, boundary conditions imposed by sample launch and die impact can have important effects on formability.


2010 ◽  
Vol 107 (12) ◽  
pp. 124907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da Xu ◽  
Xuesong Liu ◽  
Kun Fang ◽  
Hongyuan Fang

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 520-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhiraj Gayakwad ◽  
Mahesh Kumar Dargar ◽  
Pramod Kumar Sharma ◽  
Rajesh purohit ◽  
R.S. Rana

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document