River sediment (S-37) - A new analytical quality control material ensuring comparability of chlorinated hydrocarbon analysis during an international environmental study in China

2000 ◽  
Vol 367 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Gawlik ◽  
D. Martens ◽  
B. Henkelmann ◽  
K. W. Schramm ◽  
A. Kettrup ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (09) ◽  
pp. 593-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Petersen ◽  
Una Sølvik ◽  
Sverre Sandberg ◽  
Anne Stavelin

SummaryMany primary care laboratories use point-of-care (POC) instruments to monitor patients on anticoagulant treatment. The internal analytical quality control of these instruments is often assessed by analysing lyophilised control materials and/or by sending patient samples to a local hospital laboratory for comparison (split sample).The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of these two models of prothrombin time quality control. The models were evaluated by power functions created by computer simulations based on empirical data from 18 primary care laboratories using the POC instruments Thrombotrack, CoaguChek S, or Hemochron Jr. Signature. The control rules 12S, 13S, exponential weighted moving average, and the deviation limits of ± 10% and ± 20% were evaluated by their probability of error detection and false rejections. The total within-lab coefficient of variation was 3.8% and 6.9% for Thrombotrack, 8.9% and 10.5% for CoaguChek S, and 9.4% and 14.8% for Hemochron Jr. Signature for the control sample measurements and the split sample measurements, respectively. The probability of error detection was higher using a lyophilised control material than a patient split sample for all three instruments, whereas the probability of false rejection was similar. A higher probability of error detection occurred when lyophilised control material was used compared with the patient split samples; therefore, lyophilised control material should be used for internal analytical quality control of prothrombin time in primary health care.





1986 ◽  
Vol 18 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 35-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Gardner ◽  
D T. E. Hunt ◽  
G. Topping

It is widely recognised that, unless special steps are taken, analytical results from a group of laboratories engaged in a monitoring programme are likely to be of poor comparability. This in turn can prejudice the conclusions drawn from the results of monitoring. On the basis of previous studies, the problem is known to be particularly acute for measurements of trace metals in saline waters. Recognising the difficulty, the Marine Pollution Monitoring Management Group (MPMMG) and the Water Research centre (WRc) have organised a programme of Analytical Quality Control (AQC). This has the objective of ensuring that analytical results for filterable cadmium and mercury in saline waters, obtained by water industry and other relevant laboratories, are of adequate accuracy and comparability for their intended uses. WRc is to coordinate a series of tests, some involving distributions of standards and samples, which the participating laboratories undertake; this series of tests, the background to the approach and some of the results obtained to date are described here.



2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 302-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Marques-Garcia ◽  
M.F. Garcia-Codesal ◽  
M.R. Caro-Narros ◽  
T. Contreras-SanFeliciano




Talanta ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 228 ◽  
pp. 122137
Author(s):  
Alaa A. Makki ◽  
Suha Elderderi ◽  
Victor Massot ◽  
Renaud Respaud ◽  
Hugh.J. Byrne ◽  
...  


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. B. Rudakov ◽  
S. Y. Nikitina


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document