Manipulation of physical 3-D and virtual 2-D stimuli: comparing digit placement and fixation position

Author(s):  
Ryan W. Langridge ◽  
Jonathan J. Marotta
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
Risako Inagaki ◽  
Hiroko Suzuki ◽  
Takashi Haseoka ◽  
Shinji Arai ◽  
Yuri Takagi ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Missal ◽  
Rufin Vogels ◽  
Chao-Yi Li ◽  
Guy A. Orban

Missal et al. observed that the responses of inferior temporal (IT) neurons to a shape were reduced markedly when this shape partially overlapped a larger second shape, suggesting that shape interactions determine IT responses. In the present study, we compared the responses of IT neurons with combinations of two shapes which did or did not overlap and studied the effect of the relative and absolute positions of the two shapes. In a first test, a preferred shape (figure) was presented at the fixation point while a second, nonpreferred, shape was displayed either in the background of the figure (overlap) or at one of four peripheral positions (nonoverlap). Controls consisted of presentations of either shape in isolation at each of the five positions. The stimuli were presented during a fixation task. The responses to these combinations of two shapes were, on average, reduced compared with those elicited by the preferred shape presented in isolation. This suppression occurred whether or not the two shapes overlapped, but the degree of suppression in the overlap and nonoverlap conditions did not correlate. These interactions were stronger when the interacting stimulus was located in the contralateral compared with the ipsilateral hemifield. The position of the interacting stimulus within a hemifield significantly affected the suppression associated with combined shapes in some neurons. The strength of the interactions of the two nonoverlapping shapes depended on the shape of the interacting stimulus in half of the neurons. In a second test, the preferred shape and interacting stimulus could appear either at the fixation point or at one eccentric position. Here we found that the suppression was, on average, strongest when the interacting stimulus, rather than the preferred shape, was presented at the fixation position. Also, in 40% of the neurons, the response reduction was similar in overlap and nonoverlap conditions if effects of stimulus position were taken into account. In both tests, we also measured the responses to combinations of a nonpreferred shape and the interacting stimulus and showed that the response to a combination of two nonpreferred shapes was, in general, smaller than the response to a combination of the preferred and nonpreferred shape. Overall the results indicate that stimulus interactions in the receptive fields of IT neurons can be position and shape selective; this can contribute to the coding for the relationships between object parts.


2013 ◽  
Vol 142 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphanie Ducrot ◽  
Joël Pynte ◽  
Alain Ghio ◽  
Bernard Lété

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. e60128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Younes Zerouali ◽  
Jean-Marc Lina ◽  
Boutheina Jemel

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 639-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.F.W. Neggers ◽  
H. Bekkering

It is well known that, typically, saccadic eye movements precede goal-directed hand movements to a visual target stimulus. Also pointing in general is more accurate when the pointing target is gazed at. In this study, it is hypothesized that saccades are not only preceding pointing but that gaze also is stabilized during pointing in humans. Subjects, whose eye and pointing movements were recorded, had to make a hand movement and a saccade to a first target. At arm movement peak velocity, when the eyes are usually already fixating the first target, a new target appeared, and subjects had to make a saccade toward it ( dynamical trial type). In the statical trial type, a new target was offered when pointing was just completed. In a control experiment, a sequence of two saccades had to be made, with two different interstimulus intervals (ISI), comparable with the ISIs found in the first experiment for dynamic and static trial types. In a third experiment, ocular fixation position and pointing target were dissociated, subjects pointed at not fixated targets. The results showed that latencies of saccades toward the second target were on average 155 ms longer in the dynamic trial types, compared with the static trial types. Saccades evoked during pointing appeared to be delayed with approximately the remaining deceleration time of the pointing movement, resulting in “normal” residual saccadic reaction times (RTs), measured from pointing movement offset to saccade movement onset. In the control experiment, the latency of the second saccade was on average only 29 ms larger when the two targets appeared with a short ISI compared with trials with long ISIs. Therefore the saccadic refractory period cannot be responsible for the substantially bigger delays that were found in the first experiment. The observed saccadic delay during pointing is modulated by the distance between ocular fixation position and pointing target. The largest delays were found when the targets coincided, the smallest delays when they were dissociated. In sum, our results provide evidence for an active saccadic inhibition process, presumably to keep steady ocular fixation at a pointing target and its surroundings. Possible neurophysiological substrates that might underlie the reported phenomena are discussed.


2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 488-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jukka Hyönä ◽  
Raymond Bertram

We argue that although E-Z Reader does a good job in simulating many basic facts related to readers' eye movements, two phenomena appear to pose a challenge to the model. The first has to do with word length mediating the way compound words are identified; the second concerns the effects of initial fixation position in a word on eye behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document