scholarly journals Barcoding and morphometry to identify and assess genetic population differentiation and size variability in loliginid squid paralarvae from NE Atlantic (Spain)

2018 ◽  
Vol 165 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Olmos-Pérez ◽  
Graham J. Pierce ◽  
Álvaro Roura ◽  
Ángel F. González
Genes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 810
Author(s):  
Berner

This note is to correct an error in my paper, concerning the Shannon differentiation metric (DShannon) (Reference [43] in the paper). The paper states that DShannon is undefined mathematically whenever one or both populations are monomorphic, that is, fixed for a single allele. Accordingly, the DShannon curve in Figure 1a, showing population differentiation in relation to allele counts for the case in which the pooled minor allele frequency (MAF) is maximal, did not extend across the full range of allele counts; the rightmost data point reflecting complete population differentiation was missing. Moreover, DShannon was completely missing in Figure 1b visualizing the continuum of allele frequency differentiation when the MAF is minimal (one population monomorphic across the entire allele count range).


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1489-1500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Arens ◽  
Theo van der Sluis ◽  
Wendy P. C. van’t Westende ◽  
Ben Vosman ◽  
Claire C. Vos ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. e3311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan C. Motamayor ◽  
Philippe Lachenaud ◽  
Jay Wallace da Silva e Mota ◽  
Rey Loor ◽  
David N. Kuhn ◽  
...  

Genes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berner

Measuring the magnitude of differentiation between populations based on genetic markers is commonplace in ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. The predominant differentiation metric used for this purpose is FST. Based on a qualitative survey, numerical analyses, simulations, and empirical data, I here argue that FST does not express the relationship to allele frequency differentiation between populations generally considered interpretable and desirable by researchers. In particular, FST (1) has low sensitivity when population differentiation is weak, (2) is contingent on the minor allele frequency across the populations, (3) can be strongly affected by asymmetry in sample sizes, and (4) can differ greatly among the available estimators. Together, these features can complicate pattern recognition and interpretation in population genetic and genomic analysis, as illustrated by empirical examples, and overall compromise the comparability of population differentiation among markers and study systems. I argue that a simple differentiation metric displaying intuitive properties, the absolute allele frequency difference AFD, provides a valuable alternative to FST. I provide a general definition of AFD applicable to both bi- and multi-allelic markers and conclude by making recommendations on the sample sizes needed to achieve robust differentiation estimates using AFD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 2134-2143
Author(s):  
Niall J McKeown ◽  
Piera Carpi ◽  
Joana F Silva ◽  
Amy J E Healey ◽  
Paul W Shaw ◽  
...  

Abstract This study used RAD-seq-derived SNPs to explore population connectivity, local adaptation, and individual assignment in European sprat (Sprattus sprattus) and inform the alignment of management units with biological processes. FST, clustering, and outlier analyses support a genetically cohesive population spanning the Celtic Sea-English Channel-North Sea-Kattegat (NE Atlantic) region. The lack of structure among the NE Atlantic samples indicates connectivity across current management boundaries. However, the assumption of demographic panmixia is cautioned against unless verified by a multidisciplinary approach. The data confirm high genetic divergence of a Baltic population (average FST vs. NE Atlantic samples = 0.051) with signatures compatible with local adaptation in the form of outlier loci, some of which are shown to occur within exonic regions. The outliers permit diagnostic assignment of individuals between the NE Atlantic and Baltic populations and thus represent a “reduced panel” of markers for monitoring a potential mixed stock fishery within the western Baltic. Overall, this study provides information that may help refine spatial management boundaries of sprat and resources for genetic-assisted management.


2001 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 563 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Ward ◽  
N. G. Elliott

A summary is given of allozyme, mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite data for commercially important species (13 fish and 7 shellfish) in Australia’s South East Fishery, including contiguous waters and the Tasman Sea. For most fish species, genetic population differentiation was limited and in about half the studies was non-detectable. Striking population differentiation was recorded for gemfish. For fish species, on average only 2–3% of the total genetic variation could be attributed to population differentiation within southern Australian waters. In shellfish, ~5% of variation arose from population differences. The reduced differentiation of fish populations may be due to a longer larval period and greater adult mobility. Although there was evidence that the Tasman Sea acts as a barrier to gene flow, with most fish species showing significant differences between Australia and New Zealand, the degree of differentiation was small (only ~2%). The limited genetic differentiation obserred for most species is attributable to the lack of major oceanographic and environmental barriers to gene flow, together with influential current systems; it necessitates large sample sizes for good genetic tests. However, significant genetic stock structuring is apparent for several fish and shellfish species – particularly for coastal species, where isolation by distance may explain some of the data. Any evidence for genetic stock structure must be factored into plans for sustainable management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document