Segond fracture: involvement of the iliotibial band, anterolateral ligament, and anterior arm of the biceps femoris in knee trauma

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel De Maeseneer ◽  
Cedric Boulet ◽  
Inneke Willekens ◽  
Leon Lenchik ◽  
Johan De Mey ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jonatas Brito de Alencar Neto ◽  
Clodoaldo José Duarte de Souza ◽  
Márcio Bezerra Gadelha Lopes ◽  
Maria Luzete Costa Cavalcante ◽  
Luiz Holanda Pinto Neto

Fibular head avulsion fractures are rare and are so-called the arcuate signal. Avulsion fracture of the iliotibial band and anterolateral ligament is known as a Segond fracture, and it is another rare entity. We describe the case of a 27-year-old woman who was hit by a car and suffered polytrauma, mainly suffering injuries to both knees. Radiographs of the knees showed a Segond fracture associated with the arched signal bilaterally. The aim of this study is to present a rare case report and literature review of a bilateral fibular head avulsion fracture associated with an anterolateral tibial avulsion fracture.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596711773080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elmar Herbst ◽  
Marcio Albers ◽  
Jeremy M. Burnham ◽  
Freddie H. Fu ◽  
Volker Musahl

Background: Significant controversy exists regarding the anterolateral structures of the knee. Purpose: To determine the layer-by-layer anatomic structure of the anterolateral complex of the knee. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (age range, 38-56 years) underwent a layer-by-layer dissection to systematically expose and identify the various structures of the anterolateral complex. Quantitative measurements were performed, and each layer was documented with high-resolution digital imaging. Results: The anterolateral complex of the knee consisted of different distinct layers, with the superficial and deep iliotibial band (ITB) representing layer 1. The superficial ITB had a distinct connection to the distal femoral metaphysis and femoral condyle (Kaplan fibers), and the deep layers of the ITB were identified originating at the level of the Kaplan fibers proximally. This functional unit, consisting of the superficial and deep ITB, was reinforced by the capsulo-osseous layer of the ITB, which was continuous with the fascia of the lateral gastrocnemius and biceps femoris muscles. These 3 components of the ITB became confluent distally, and the insertion spanned from the Gerdy tubercle anteriorly to the lateral tibia posteriorly on a small tubercle (lateral tibial tuberosity). Layer 3 consisted of the anterolateral capsule, in which 35% (7/20) of specimens had a discreet mid-third capsular ligament. Conclusion: The anterolateral complex consists of the superficial and deep ITB, the capsulo-osseous layer of the ITB, and the anterolateral capsule. The anterolateral complex is defined by the part of the ITB between the Kaplan fibers proximally and its tibial insertion, which forms a functional unit. A discrete anterolateral ligament was not observed; however, the anterolateral ligament described in recent studies likely refers to the capsulo-osseous layer or the mid-third capsular ligament. Clinical Relevance: The anterolateral knee structures form a complex functional unit. Surgeons should use caution when attempting to restore this intricate structure with extra-articular procedures designed to re-create a single discreet ligament.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 321-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart Stuyts ◽  
Elke Van den Eeden ◽  
Jan Victor

Background:Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a well-established surgical procedure for the correction of ACL ruptures. However, the incidence of instability following ACL reconstruction is substantial. Recent studies have led to greater insight into the anatomy and the radiographic characteristics of the native anterolateral ligament (ALL), along with its possible role in residual instability after ACL reconstruction.Method:The current paper describes a lateral extra-articular tenodesis to reconstruct the ALL during ACL procedures, using a short iliotibial band strip. The distal insertion of this strip is left intact on the anterolateral side of the proximal tibia, and the proximal part is fixed at the anatomic femoral insertion of the ALL.Results:Our technique avoids the sacrifice of one of the hamstring tendons for the ALL reconstruction. Additionally, there is no interference with the anatomical location or function of the LCL.Conclusion:Our technique offers a minimally invasive and nearly complete anatomical reconstruction of the ALL with minimal additional operative time.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 2247-2252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humza Shaikh ◽  
Elmar Herbst ◽  
Ata Amir Rahnemai-Azar ◽  
Marcio Bottene Villa Albers ◽  
Jan-Hendrik Naendrup ◽  
...  

Background: The Segond fracture was classically described as an avulsion fracture of the anterolateral capsule of the knee. Recently, some authors have attributed its pathogenesis to the “anterolateral ligament” (ALL). Biomechanical studies that have attempted to reproduce this fracture in vitro have reported conflicting findings. Purpose: To determine the anatomic characteristics of the Segond fracture on plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to compare this location with the location of the ALL described in prior radiographic and anatomic publications, and to determine the fracture’s attachments to the soft tissue anterolateral structures of the knee. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 36 anterior cruciate ligament–injured patients with Segond fractures (33 male, 3 female; mean age, 23.2 ± 8.4 years) were enrolled. MRI scans were reviewed to determine the anatomic characteristics of the Segond fracture, including the following: proximal-distal (PD) length, anterior-posterior (AP) width, medial-lateral (ML) width, PD distance to the lateral tibial plateau, AP distance to the Gerdy tubercle (GT), and AP distance from the GT to the posterior aspect of the fibular head. The attachment of the anterolateral structures to the Segond fragment was then categorized as the iliotibial band (ITB) or anterolateral capsule. Interrater reliability of the measurements was determined by calculating the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 2016 for the following keywords: (1) “Segond fracture,” (2) “anterolateral ligament,” (3) “knee avulsion,” (4) “lateral tibia avulsion,” and (5) “tibial plateau avulsion.” All studies describing the anatomic location of the Segond fracture and the ALL were included in the systematic review. Results: On plain radiographs, the mean distance of the midpoint of the fracture to the lateral tibial plateau was 4.6 ± 2.2 mm. The avulsed fracture had a mean PD length of 9.2 ± 2.5 mm and a mean ML width of 2.4 ± 1.4 mm. On MRI, the mean distance of the proximal fracture to the tibial plateau was 3.4 ± 1.6 mm. The mean PD length was 8.7 ± 2.2 mm, while the mean AP width was 11.1 ± 2.2 mm. The mean distance between the GT and the center of the fracture was 26.9 ± 3.3 mm, while the mean distance between the GT and the posterior fibular head was 53.9 ± 4.4 mm. The mean distance of the midpoint of the fracture to the tibial plateau was 7.8 ± 2.7 mm, while the center of the fracture was 49.9% of the distance between the GT and the posterior aspect of the fibular head. Analysis of soft tissue structures attached to the fragment revealed that the ITB attached in 34 of 36 patients and the capsule attached in 34 of 36 patients. One patient had only the capsule attached, another had only the ITB attached, and the last showed neither clearly attached. A literature review of 20 included studies revealed no difference between the previously described Segond fracture location and the tibial insertion of the ALL. Conclusion: The results of this study confirmed that while the Segond fracture occurs at the location of the tibial insertion of the ALL, as reported in the literature, MRI was unable to identify any distinct ligamentous attachment. MRI analysis revealed that soft tissue attachments to the Segond fracture were the posterior fibers of the ITB and the lateral capsule in 94% of patients.


2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. LaPrade ◽  
Thomas J. Gilbert ◽  
Timothy S. Bollom ◽  
Fred Wentorf ◽  
Gregory Chaljub

The purpose of this study was to contrast the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of uninjured components of the posterolateral knee with that of injured structures, and to assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in identifying posterolateral knee complex injuries. Thin-slice coronal oblique T1-weighted images through the entire fibular head were used to identify the posterolateral structures in seven uninjured knees. The appearance of corresponding grade III injuries to these structures was identified prospectively in 20 patients and verified at the time of surgical reconstruction. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of imaging for the most frequently injured posterolateral knee structures in this series were as follows: iliotibial band-deep layer (91.7%, 100%, and 95%), short head of the biceps femoris-direct arm (81.3%, 100%, and 85%), short head of the biceps femoris-anterior arm (92.9%, 100%, and 95%), midthird lateral capsular ligament-meniscotibial (93.8%, 100%, and 95%), fibular collateral ligament (94.4%, 100%, and 95%), popliteus origin on femur (93.3%, 80%, and 90%), popliteofibular ligament (68.8%, 66.7%, and 68%), and the fabellofibular ligament (85.7%, 85.7%, and 85.7%). Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee was accurate in the identification of these injuries.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Michelle A. Sandrey ◽  
Cody Lancellotti ◽  
Cory Hester

Context: Soft tissue restrictions have been linked to poor flexibility and decreased range of motion (ROM). To decrease the soft tissue restrictions and ultimately increase ROM/flexibility, myofascial release techniques, such as foam rolling (FR) and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM), have been used. However, the benefit regarding which technique is more beneficial remains unknown. Objective: To examine the effects of myofascial release techniques (FR vs the instrumented portion of IASTM) on knee joint ROM, rectus femoris (RF) and biceps femoris (BF) fascial displacement, and patient satisfaction. Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Setting: Mid-Atlantic University. Participants: Twenty moderately active participants (age 21.1 [2.0] y) with variable levels of soft tissue restriction in the quadriceps and hamstrings started and completed the study. Participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups, FR or IASTM. Interventions: All participants completed the same warm-up prior to the intervention. The FR group followed the proper FR protocol for gluteals/iliotibial band, quadriceps, and hamstrings/adductors, and the participants were monitored while the protocol was completed. The IASTM group received treatment on the gluteals/iliotibial band followed by the quadriceps, adductors, and hamstrings. Participants in both groups attended intervention sessions twice per week for 3 weeks. Prior to the start, knee ROM measurements were taken, along with fascial displacement measured via ultrasound. Upon completion of the study, posttest measurements were completed. A patient satisfaction survey was also administered at this time. Main Outcome Measures: Pretest to posttest knee ROM measurements, RF and BF fascial displacement, and patient satisfaction. Results: Both groups improved pretest to posttest for knee-extension ROM, with a slight trend toward increased knee-extension ROM for the FR group. Both groups improved pretest to posttest for BF and RF fascial displacement, in favor of the IASTM group for BF fascial displacement. Both groups were equally satisfied. Conclusions: As both groups improved pretest to posttest, either treatment could be used.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 1018-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank R. Noyes ◽  
Lauren E. Huser ◽  
Darin Jurgensmeier ◽  
James Walsh ◽  
Martin S. Levy

Background: The effect of an anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction on rotational knee stability and corresponding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft forces using multiple knee loading conditions including the pivot-shift phenomenon has not been determined. Purpose: First, to determine the rotational stability and ACL graft forces provided by an anatomic bone–patellar tendon–bone ACL reconstruction in the ACL-deficient knee alone and with an associated ALL/iliotibial band (ITB) injury. Second, to determine the added rotational stabilizing effect and reduction in ACL graft forces provided by an ALL reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A 6 degrees of freedom robotic simulator was used to test 7 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens during 5 testing conditions: intact, ACL-sectioned, ACL-reconstructed, ALL/ITB-sectioned, and ALL-reconstructed. Lateral and medial tibiofemoral compartment translations and internal tibial rotations were measured under Lachman test conditions, 5-N·m internal rotation, and 2 pivot-shift simulations. Statistical equivalence within 2 mm and 2° was defined as P < .05. Results: Single-graft ACL reconstruction restored central tibial translation under Lachman testing and internal rotation under 5-N·m internal rotation torque ( P < .05). A modest increase in internal rotation under 5-N·m internal rotation torque occurred after ALL/ITB sectioning of 5.1° (95% CI, 3.6° to 6.7°) and 6.7° (95% CI, 4.3° to 9.1°) at 60° and 90° of flexion, respectively ( P = .99). Lateral compartment translation increases in the pivot-shift tests were <2 mm. ALL reconstruction restored internal rotation within 0.5° (95% CI, –1.9° to 2.9°) and 0.7° (95% CI, –2.0° to 3.4°) of the ACL-reconstructed state at 60° and 90° of flexion, respectively ( P < .05). The ALL procedure reduced ACL graft forces, at most, 75 N in the pivot-shift tests and 81 N in the internal rotation tests. Conclusion: Although the ALL reconstruction corrected the small abnormal changes in the internal rotation limit at high flexion angles, the procedure had no effect in limiting tibiofemoral compartment translations in the pivot-shift test and produced only modest decreases in ACL graft forces. Accordingly, the recommendation to perform an ALL reconstruction to correct pivot-shift abnormalities is questioned. Clinical Relevance: The small changes in rotational stability after ALL/ITB sectioning would not seem to warrant the routine addition of an ALL reconstruction in primary ACL injuries. Clinical exceptions may exist, as in grossly unstable grade 3 pivot-shift knees and revision knees. However, the concern exists of overconstraining normal tibial rotations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 1765-1772
Author(s):  
Luke Lintin ◽  
Rajat Chowdhury ◽  
Phil Yoong ◽  
Siok Li Chung ◽  
Ramy Mansour ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document