scholarly journals Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus at high cardiovascular risk: 5-year follow-up of the prospective multicenter BARDOT trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Caobelli ◽  
◽  
Philip Haaf ◽  
Gianluca Haenny ◽  
Matthias Pfisterer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Perfusion Scintigraphy ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk

Abstract Background The Basel Asymptomatic High-Risk Diabetics’ Outcome Trial (BARDOT) demonstrated that asymptomatic diabetic patients with an abnormal myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) were at increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) at 2-year follow-up. It remains unclear whether this finding holds true even for a longer follow-up. Methods Four hundred patients with type 2 diabetes, neither history nor symptoms of coronary artery disease (CAD), were evaluated clinically and with MPS. Patients were followed up for 5 years. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or late coronary revascularization. Results At baseline, an abnormal MPS (SSS ≥ 4 or SDS ≥ 2) was found in 87 of 400 patients (22%). MACE within 5 years occurred in 14 patients with abnormal MPS (16.1%) and in 22 with normal scan (1.7%), p = 0.009; 15 deaths were recorded. Patients with completely normal MPS (SSS and SDS = 0) had lower rates of MACEs than patients with abnormal scans (2.5% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.032). Patients with abnormal MPS who had undergone revascularization had a lower mortality rate and a better event-free survival from MI and revascularization than patients with abnormal MPS who had either undergone medical therapy only or could not be revascularized (p = 0.002). Conclusions MPS may have prognostic value in asymptomatic diabetic patients at high cardiovascular risk over a follow-up period of 5 years. Patients with completely normal MPS have a low event rate and may not need retesting within 5 years. Patients with an abnormal MPS have higher event rates and may benefit from a combined medical and revascularization approach.

scholarly journals Assessment of the warranty period of a normal myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with diabetes mellitus: 5 year follow-up of the prospective multicenter BARDOT trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Haaf ◽  
F Caobelli ◽  
G Haenny ◽  
M Pfisterer ◽  
MJ Zellweger
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Perfusion Scintigraphy ◽  
Warranty Period ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Swiss National Foundation for Research Background Asymptomatic diabetic patients with an abnormal myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) are known to be at an increased risk of major cardiac events (MACE) at 2-years follow-up. It remains unclear whether this finding holds true even for a follow-up of 5 years. Methods four hundred patients with type-2 diabetes without coronary artery disease were evaluated clinically and with MPS and followed up for 5 years. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction or late coronary revascularization.  Results  An abnormal MPS (SSS≥4 or SSS≥2) was found in 87 patients (21.8%). MACE within 5 years occurred in 14 patients with abnormal MPS (16.1%) and in 22 with normal scan (1.7%, p = 0.009); 15 deaths were recorded (3.8%). Patients with normal MPS had lower rates of MACEs than patients with abnormal scans (p = 0.016) (Figure 1A + B). Patients with abnormal MPS who had undergone revascularization had a lower mortality rate and a better event free survival from MI and revascularization than patients with abnormal MPS who had either undergone medical therapy only or could not be revascularized (Figure 1C + D).  Conclusions Patients with  normal MPS have a low event rate and may not need retesting within 5 years (warranty period). Patients with an abnormal MPS have higher event rates and may benefit from a combined medical and revascularization approach. Abstract Figure 1 A-D

Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in elderly patients with hypertension: a 10-year follow-up analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1570-1580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Nai Fovino ◽  
Giorgio Saladini ◽  
Anna Rita Cervino ◽  
Francesca Saladini ◽  
Michele Gregianin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy ◽  
Perfusion Scintigraphy

Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in diabetic patients and without coronary lesion

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-106
Author(s):  
E. López Rodríguez ◽  
B. Jauregui Garrido ◽  
J. Ruiz Franco-Baux ◽  
L. Caballero Gullón ◽  
A. Guisado Rasco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Perfusion Scintigraphy ◽  
Coronary Lesion

Abstract 003: Personalizing the Intensity of Blood Pressure Control: Modeling the Heterogeneity of Risks and Benefits From the SPRINT Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna K Patel ◽  
Suzanne V Arnold ◽  
Paul S Chan ◽  
Yuanyuan Tang ◽  
Yashashwi Pokharel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Risk Model ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Intensive Treatment ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Serious Adverse Events

Introduction: In SPRINT (Systolic blood PRessure INtervention Trial), non-diabetic patients with hypertension at high cardiovascular risk treated with intensive blood pressure (BP) control (<120mmHg) had fewer major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause deaths but higher rates of serious adverse events (SAE) compared with patients treated with standard BP control (<140mmHg). However, the degree of benefit or harm for an individual patient could vary due to heterogeneity in treatment effect. Methods: Using patient-level data from SPRINT, we developed predictive models for benefit (freedom from death or MACE) and harm (increased SAE) to allow for individualized BP treatment goals based on projected risk-benefit for each patient. Interactions between candidate variable and treatment were evaluated in the models to identify differential treatment effects. We performed 10 fold cross-validation for both the models. Results: Among 9361 patients, 8606 (92%) patients had no MACE or death event (benefit) and 3529 (38%) patients had a SAE (harm) over a median follow-up of 3.3 years. The benefit model showed good discrimination (c-index= 0.72; cross-validated c-index= 0.72) with treatment interactions of age, sex, and baseline systolic BP (Figure A), with more benefit of intensive BP treatment in patients who are older, male, and have lower baseline SBP. The SAE risk model showed moderate discrimination (c-index=0.66; cross-validated c-index= 0.65) with a treatment interaction of baseline renal function (Figure B), indicating less harm of intensive treatment in patients with a higher baseline creatinine. The mean predicted absolute benefit of intensive BP treatment was of 2.2% ± 2.5% compared with standard treatment, but ranged from 10.7% lower benefit to 17% greater benefit in individual patients. Similarly, mean predicted absolute harm with intensive treatment was 1.0% ± 1.9%, but ranged from 15.9% lesser harm to 4.9% more harm. Conclusion: Among non-diabetic patients with hypertension at high cardiovascular risk, we developed prediction models using basic clinical data that can identify patients with higher likelihood of benefit vs. harm with BP treatment strategies. These models could be used to tailor the treatment approach based on the projected risk and benefit for each unique patient.

scholarly journals Comparison of the prognostic value of stress and rest pulmonary transit time estimation using myocardial perfusion CMR

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Seraphim ◽  
K Knott ◽  
K Menacho ◽  
J Augusto ◽  
R Davies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Transit Time ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Time Estimation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Pulmonary Transit Time ◽  
Perfusion Cmr ◽  
Center Study

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Training Fellowship Background Pulmonary transit time (PTT) is a quantitative biomarker of cardiopulmonary status. Rest PTT was previously shown to predict outcomes in specific disease models, but clinical adoption is hindered but challenges in data acquisition. Whether evaluation of PTT during stress encodes incremental prognostic information has not been previously investigated as scale. Objectives To compare the prognostic value of stress and rest PTT derived from a fully automated, in-line method of estimation using perfusion CMR, in a large patient cohort. Methods A retrospective two-center study of patients referred clinically for adenosine stress myocardial perfusion assessment using CMR. Analysis of right and left ventricular cavity arterial input function curves from first pass perfusion was performed automatically, allowing the in-line estimation of both rest and stress PTT. Association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was evaluated. MACE was defined as a composite outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure admission and ventricular tachycardia or appropriate ICD treatment (including ICD shock and/or anti-tachycardia pacing). Results 985 patients (67% male, median age 62 years (IQR 52,71)) were included, with median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 62% (IQR 54-69). Median stress PTT was shorter than rest PTT 6.2 (IQR 5.1, 7.7) seconds versus 7.7 (IQR, 6.4, 9.2) seconds. Stress and rest PTT were highly correlated (r = 0.69; p &lt; 0.001). Stress PTT also correlated with LVEF (r=-0.37), stress MBF (r=-0.31), LVEDVi (r = 0.24), LA area index (r = 0.32) (p &lt; 0.001 for all). Over a median follow-up period of 28.6 (IQR, 22.6 35,7) months, MACE occurred in 61 (6.2%) patients. After adjusting for prognostic factors, both rest and stress PTT, independently predicted MACE, but not all-cause mortality. For every 1xSD (2.39s) increase in rest PTT the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for MACE was 1.43 (95% CI 1.10-1.85, p = 0.007). The hazard ratio for one standard deviation (2.64s) increase in stress PTT was 1.34 (95% CI 1.048-1.723; p = 0.020) after adjusting for age, LVEF, hypertension, diabetes, sex and presence of LGE Conclusions In this 2-center study of 985 patients, we deploy a fully automated method of PTT estimation using perfusion mapping with CMR and show that both stress and rest PTT are independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. In this patient cohort, there is no clear incremental prognostic value of stress PTT, over its evaluation during rest. Figure 1. Stress and Rest Pulmonary Transit Time estimation using myocardial perfusion CMR Figure 2. Event-free survival curves for major adverse cardiovascular events (Heart failure hospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke and ventricular tachycardia/ICD treatment) according to mean rest PTT (8.05seconds) and mean stress PTT (6.7seconds). Log-rank for both p &lt; 0.05

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document