Effect of sand texture on nest quality and mating success in a fish with parental care

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin H. Olsson ◽  
Elisabet Forsgren ◽  
Sami Merilaita ◽  
Charlotta Kvarnemo ◽  
Colette St Mary
2011 ◽  
Vol 279 (1734) ◽  
pp. 1784-1790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne H. Alonzo

Explaining the evolution of male care has proved difficult. Recent theory predicts that female promiscuity and sexual selection on males inherently disfavour male care. In sharp contrast to these expectations, male-only care is often found in species with high extra-pair paternity and striking variation in mating success, where current theory predicts female-only care. Using a model that examines the coevolution of male care, female care and female choice; I show that inter-sexual selection can drive the evolution of male care when females are able to bias mating or paternity towards parental males. Surprisingly, female choice for parental males allows male care to evolve despite low relatedness between the male and the offspring in his care. These results imply that predicting how sexual selection affects parental care evolution will require further understanding of why females, in many species, either do not prefer or cannot favour males that provide care.


The Condor ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 836-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin E. Omland ◽  
Thomas W. Sherry

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anyelet Valencia-Aguilar ◽  
Juan M. Guayasamin ◽  
Cynthia P. A. Prado

AbstractParental care is costly, thus theory predicts that parents should avoid caring for unrelated offspring. However, alloparenting has been reported in many taxa because it may increase the caregiver mating success or offspring survival. We experimentally investigated the existence of allopaternal care in two glassfrog species, Hyalinobatrachium chirripoi and Centrolene peristicta, and discussed possible costs and benefits. Males mated with multiple females and cared for clutches, while continued to call. In the field, we randomly placed unrelated clutches in the territory of males already caring for their clutches and in the territory of non-attending males. Attending males adopted unrelated clutches, whereas non-attending males abandoned their territories. Once males adopted unrelated offspring, they cared for all clutches in a similar frequency and gained new clutches. Alloparenting was context-dependent, as only males already caring for their clutches adopted unrelated ones. We suggest that steroid hormonal levels might mediate the adoption of unrelated offspring by attending males. Additionally, our results suggest that males do not directly discriminate between related and unrelated offspring. Alloparenting has been widely investigated in different vertebrates, except for amphibians. Thus, our study sheds light on the roles of alloparenting for offspring survival and mating success in this group.


1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 956-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. G. Jamieson ◽  
D. M. Blouw ◽  
P. W. Colgan

To investigate constraints imposed by male parental behavior on male mating success we compared mate competition in two related 'species' of stickleback, one showing parental care (threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus), the other not (white stickleback, Gasterosteus sp.). Three males of each species (tested separately) competed for spawnings with gravid females over a 10-day period. Our findings showed that once a threespine male acquires its first clutch of eggs, the chances of it spawning successively over the next 4 days increase, after which courtship activity declines and parental care of eggs increases. This leads to a serial pattern of spawning amongst the three males in which the second male spawns successively in its nest after the first male has completed its spawnings, followed by the third male, if it spawns at all. However, the third male is more likely to steal fertilizations in the nests of the other two males; stolen fertilizations represented an estimated 29% of the spawning frequency of the third male, compared with 5 and 0% for the second and first males, respectively. The order in which threespine males spawned was correlated with the order in which they initiated nest construction and their ability to defend and maintain a nest site. Immediately after spawning, white stickleback males disperse their eggs among clumps of filamentous algae, where the eggs develop without further parental assistance. In contrast to threespines, white sticklebacks tested under the same competitive conditions showed a random pattern of spawning amongst the three males and stolen fertilizations were not observed. This difference in spawning pattern presumably reflects the time constraint imposed on the sexual phase by the imminent need for parental care once a threespine male obtains eggs. Without the need for parental care of eggs, white males that spawn are not under the same time constraints and therefore each successive spawning is of equal value among competing males, resulting in a random pattern of spawning. In contrast, an asymmetry exists in threespines in which males with freshly spawned eggs in their nest increase their courtship intensity relative to males without eggs, resulting in a serial or ordered pattern of spawning among the males. It is further suggested that stolen fertilizations may be a secondary adaptation to offset any inability to compete effectively for nest sites and females during the initial part of the breeding period.


1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 1689-1695 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Thoms ◽  
Peter Donahue ◽  
Doug Hunter ◽  
Naeem Jan

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gretchen F. Wagner ◽  
Emeline Mourocq ◽  
Michael Griesser

Biparental care systems are a valuable model to examine conflict, cooperation, and coordination between unrelated individuals, as the product of the interactions between the parents influences the fitness of both individuals. A common experimental technique for testing coordinated responses to changes in the costs of parental care is to temporarily handicap one parent, inducing a higher cost of providing care. However, dissimilarity in experimental designs of these studies has hindered interspecific comparisons of the patterns of cost distribution between parents and offspring. Here we apply a comparative experimental approach by handicapping a parent at nests of five bird species using the same experimental treatment. In some species, a decrease in care by a handicapped parent was compensated by its partner, while in others the increased costs of care were shunted to the offspring. Parental responses to an increased cost of care primarily depended on the total duration of care that offspring require. However, life history pace (i.e., adult survival and fecundity) did not influence parental decisions when faced with a higher cost of caring. Our study highlights that a greater attention to intergenerational trade-offs is warranted, particularly in species with a large burden of parental care. Moreover, we demonstrate that parental care decisions may be weighed more against physiological workload constraints than against future prospects of reproduction, supporting evidence that avian species may devote comparable amounts of energy into survival, regardless of life history strategy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-118
Author(s):  
Li Yanling ◽  
David E. Scharff

The following case presents the way that overtly oedipal identification in a young woman covered failure in early parental care and discontent between her parents. The case was presented by Li Yanling to her supervision group, and the commentary and elaboration have been gathered from comments from the entire group of advanced supervisees, all of whom were discussion group leaders in the Beijing Continuous Program in Psychoanalytic Couple and Family Therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document