Liver Resection for Primary Intrahepatic Stones: Focus on Postoperative Infectious Complications

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 433-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennaro Clemente ◽  
Agostino M. De Rose ◽  
Rita Murri ◽  
Francesco Ardito ◽  
Gennaro Nuzzo ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony W. Farfus ◽  
Markus I. Trochsler ◽  
Guy J. Maddern ◽  
Li Lian Kuan

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Kumar ◽  
A Kumar ◽  
D Mondal

Abstract Background The increasing use of imaging has led to incidental findings in the liver. The Western experience of managing focal intrahepatic duct dilatation (FIDD) is not well recorded. We present our experience based on a large prospectively maintained database at a tertiary hepatobiliary surgical unit. Method Patients with liver resection for FIDD between January 2003-December 2019 were retrospectively identified from the liver unit database. The demographics, symptomatology, blood test results, imaging, type of liver resection, morbidity, mortality, and histology of resected specimens were recorded. Results 9 patients had FIDD among 994 liver resections performed (0.9%). 6 patients were asymptomatic, 2 upper abdominal pain and 1 recurrent gram-negative sepsis. Liver function tests were normal in all patients. Two patients had cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), 4 intrahepatic stones, 1 intraductal papillary neoplasm of bile duct (IPN –B) and 2 benign strictures. Conclusions FIDD is rare in the Western population. Most patients are asymptomatic with an incidental finding of FIDD on cross-sectional imaging. Differentiating benign and malignant pathology is difficult warranting liver resection in fit patients to resolve the diagnosis. Liver resection is safe and can be potentially curative in patients with a neoplasm, which can occur in 30% of patients with FIDD.


2011 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Šubrt ◽  
A. Ferko ◽  
B. Jon ◽  
F. Čečka

HPB Surgery ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Andersson ◽  
Karl-Göran Tranberg ◽  
Stig Beng-Mark

Intrahepatic stones are difficult to manage, especially when they are associated with bile duct stricture, cholangitis and destruction of liver parenchyma. Suggested modes of treatment include surgical bile duct exploration, endoscopic procedures, transhepatic cholangiolithotomy and liver resection. This paper reports 2 patients in whom liver resection was performed because of intrahepatic ductal stones, bile duct strictures and repeated episodes of cholangitis. Liver resection was uncomplicated and long-term results were satisfactory. Our results support the view that liver resection is indicated in rare instances of intrahepatic bile duct stones associated with bile duct strictures.


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (29) ◽  
pp. 3660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao-Qiang Li ◽  
Li-Jian Liang ◽  
Yun-Peng Hua ◽  
Bao-Gang Peng ◽  
Dong Chen ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S313
Author(s):  
B. Wellge ◽  
A. Heumann ◽  
L. Fischer ◽  
J. Izbicki ◽  
J. Li

2012 ◽  
Vol 255 (5) ◽  
pp. 946-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao-Qiang Li ◽  
Li-Jian Liang ◽  
Bao-Gang Peng ◽  
Yun-Peng Hua ◽  
Ming-De Lv ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
G B Aleksanyan

Laparoscopic in comparison to open surgery reduces surgical trauma, the inflammatory response and infectious complications and minimizes immunosuppression. Large sizes of tumors, biliary or vascular reconstruction are the only obstacles to the widespread use of laparoscopic liver resections. Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative pain, hospital length of stay, postoperative morbidity and recovery times.


2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1414-1423
Author(s):  
Daisuke Kawaguchi ◽  
Yukihiko Hiroshima ◽  
Kenichi Matsuo ◽  
Keiji Koda ◽  
Itaru Endo ◽  
...  

After major liver resections, infections and liver insufficiency are the most common complications; these may coincide. We performed a randomized clinical trial to clarify ability of early enteral nutrition to prevent infectious complications and liver failure following major hepatectomy. We prospectively allocated consecutive patients who underwent major liver resection into either an early enteral nutrition group in which such nutrition was initiated on the first postoperative day or a nonenteral nutrition group. The primary study endpoint was rate of infectious complications. Thirty-two patients were randomly allocated to the enteral nutrition group, while 31 were assigned to the nonenteral nutrition group. No significant difference in rate of infection complications was evident between enteral (9.4%) and nonenteral group (22.6%, P = 0.184). However, complications of grade III severity or worse were significantly less frequent in the enteral (9.4%) than in the nonenteral group (32.3%, P = 0.031). Further, postoperative serum concentrations of pre-albumin and reduced-state albumin were greater in the enteral than in the nonenteral group. Early enteral nutrition did not significantly improve prevention of infectious complications, but some effectiveness in preventing severe complications and improving nutritional status was demonstrated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document