O-BN06 A Proposed Difficulty Grading System for Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration. Benefits to Practice and Research

Background A gap remains between the mounting evidence for single session management of bile duct stones and the obstacles to wider adoption of this approach. The practice of laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is limited not only by the availability of training opportunities and adequate equipment but also by the perception that the technique is difficult and requires a high skill-set. The aim of this analysis is to compare the preoperative and operative characteristics and the postoperative outcomes in easy vs. difficult LCBDE in a large consecutive series, according to a proposed 5 grade classification. Methods 1326 LCBDEs were graded according to the location, number and size of ductal stones, retrieval techniques used, utilisation of choledochoscopy and specific biliary pathologies encountered. The cohort was divided into two groups: easy (Grades I A&B, and Grade II A&B, requiring transcystic or transductal exploration for up to 15 stones the largest being 15mm) and difficult (Grades III A&B, for over 15 stones or intrahepatic stones of any size needing transcystic choledochoscopy, IV and V with Mirizzi Syndrome, impacted stones, and ducts needing stenting, conversion or bilioenteric anastomosis). Various outcome parameters were compared. Results Age, sex, obesity and previous biliary admissions had no effect on operative difficulty. Emergency admission, obstructive jaundice, previous ERCP and dilated CBD were predictive of difficult explorations. 78.3% of patients with acute cholecystitis or pancreatitis, 37 % of jaundice and 46% of cholangitis had easy explorations. Transcystic stone retrieval was possible in 77.7% of easy explorations and choledochotomy required in 62.3% of difficult explorations (vs. 33.6% in the whole series). Choledochoscopy was utilised in 23.4% of Grades I&II vs. 98% in difficult explorations. As expected more biliary drains, stenting, bilio-enteric anastomosis, conversions, operative time, biliary-related complications, hospital stay, readmissions and retained stones increased with difficulty. Grades I&II patients had 2 or more hospital episodes in 26.5% vs. 41.2% for grades III to V, the median presentation to resolution interval increasing from 1 to 3 weeks. There were 2 deaths in difficulty Grade V and one in Grade IIB. Conclusions Difficulty grading of LCBDE is a useful tool of predicting outcomes. It facilitates comparison between studies and fair assessment of training. LCBDEs are easy in 72% and of these 77% can be completed transcystically. It is hoped this will encourage more units to adopt single session management of bile duct stones through establishing referral protocols, developing and refining the skills through training and acquiring the necessary equipment.

Caroli's disease (clinical observation)

In their medical practice doctors deal with rare diseases which present difficulties in making a clinical diagnosis, in this case additional diagnostic methods are required. One of these diseases is Caroli's disease (syndrome), characterized by cystic enlargement of the intrahepatic bile ducts with frequent formation of intrahepatic stones. Taking into account the difficulties of early diagnosis, we present our own observation.

Intrahepatic stones

The question of intrahepatic stones is rather poorly covered in the literature, but meanwhile it has both theoretical and, in part, of no small practical importance.

Open bile duct exploration as a therapeutic solution for difficult to manage choledocholithiasis: a case report

The most common etiology of bile duct obstruction in patients with cholelithiasis is choledocholithiasis. The diagnosis of cholelithiasis is based on clinical suspicion and confirmed by ultrasound (US) of the liver and bile ducts. The management of bile duct lithiasis has evolved considerably and currently, ERCP is the most common and recommended technique. However, in cases of multiple lithiases, fragmentation of the lithiasis during extraction, excessive preoperative or transoperative handling of the ampullary region, previous stenosis of the ampullary region, juxtapapillary diverticula, primary bile duct stones, or residual intrahepatic stones, a large number of hospitals do not have sufficient resources to perform minimally invasive procedures and offer these therapeutic alternatives instead.

Laparotomy-Assisted Direct Cholangioscopy for Bile Duct Stone Removal via an Incision of the Jejunum

A 77-year-old man presented to our hospital with epigastric pain. He had previously undergone hepatic left lateral segmentectomy, cholangiojejunostomy, and Roux-en-Y reconstruction at 42 years of age for intrahepatic stones and liver abscesses. Abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography revealed bile duct stones and intrahepatic bile duct dilation of the caudate lobe. Bile duct drainage for the caudate lobe was necessary; however, the volume of his caudate lobe was very small, making percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) or endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) difficult. Therefore, we attempted laparotomy-assisted endoscopic biliary drainage. Under general anesthesia, an incision was made on the jejunum approximately 15 cm from the Y-leg anastomosis. An esophagogastroduodenoscope was directly inserted into the common hepatic duct anastomosed with the jejunum. The caudate lobe branch had severe stenosis, and the area upstream of the stenosis was filled with stones, sludge, and pus. The biliary stenosis was dilated using a balloon, and the stones were completely removed using a basket and a balloon catheter. There are various methods of biliary and pancreatic surgery and gastrointestinal reconstruction, and there are cases in which PTBD, EUS-BD, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with an enteroscope are difficult. In such cases, ERCP under laparotomy could be a good treatment option.

Double-balloon endoscopic retrograde cholangiography can make a reliable diagnosis and good prognosis for postoperative complications of congenital biliary dilatation

Bile duct and anastomotic strictures and intrahepatic stones are common postoperative complications of congenital biliary dilatation (CBD). We performed double-balloon endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (DBERC) for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes after radical surgery. We focused on the effectiveness of DBERC for the treatment of postoperative complications of CBD patients. Bile duct and anastomotic strictures and intrahepatic stones are common postoperative complications of congenital biliary dilatation (CBD). We performed double-balloon endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (DBERC) for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes after radical surgery. We focused on the effectiveness of DBERC for the treatment of postoperative complications of CBD patients. This retrospective study included 28 patients who underwent DBERC (44 procedures) after radical surgery for CBD between January 2011 and December 2019. Strictures were diagnosed as “bile duct strictures” if endoscopy confirmed the presence of bile duct mucosa between the stenotic and anastomotic regions, and as “anastomotic strictures” if the mucosa was absent. The median patient age was 4 (range 0–67) years at the time of primary surgery for CBD and 27.5 (range 8–76) years at the time of DBERC. All anastomotic strictures could be treated with only by 1–2 courses of balloon dilatation of DBERC, while many bile duct strictures (41.2%) needed ≥ 3 treatments, especially those who underwent operative bile duct plasty as the first treatment (83.3%). Although the study was limited by the short follow-up period after DBERC treatment, DBERC is recommended as the first-line treatment for hepatolithiasis associated with biliary and anastomotic strictures in CBD patients, and it can be safely performed multiple times.

407 Incidental Focal Intrahepatic Duct Dilatation (FIDD) – A Finding That Mandates Further Investigation That May Include Liver Resection

Background The increasing use of imaging has led to incidental findings in the liver. The Western experience of managing focal intrahepatic duct dilatation (FIDD) is not well recorded. We present our experience based on a large prospectively maintained database at a tertiary hepatobiliary surgical unit. Method Patients with liver resection for FIDD between January 2003-December 2019 were retrospectively identified from the liver unit database. The demographics, symptomatology, blood test results, imaging, type of liver resection, morbidity, mortality, and histology of resected specimens were recorded. Results 9 patients had FIDD among 994 liver resections performed (0.9%). 6 patients were asymptomatic, 2 upper abdominal pain and 1 recurrent gram-negative sepsis. Liver function tests were normal in all patients. Two patients had cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), 4 intrahepatic stones, 1 intraductal papillary neoplasm of bile duct (IPN –B) and 2 benign strictures. Conclusions FIDD is rare in the Western population. Most patients are asymptomatic with an incidental finding of FIDD on cross-sectional imaging. Differentiating benign and malignant pathology is difficult warranting liver resection in fit patients to resolve the diagnosis. Liver resection is safe and can be potentially curative in patients with a neoplasm, which can occur in 30% of patients with FIDD.