A Global Assessment of Access to and Use of Medical Information: The State of Evidence-Based Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 521-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lacey N. LaGrone ◽  
Amy K. Fuhs ◽  
Eduardo Huaman Egoavil ◽  
Lorrie A. Langdale ◽  
Phupit Fuangworawong ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 532-532
Author(s):  
Lacey N. LaGrone ◽  
Amy K. Fuhs ◽  
Eduardo Huaman Egoavil ◽  
Lorrie A. Langdale ◽  
Phupit Fuangworawong ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisy E. Collins ◽  
Sarah J. Ellis ◽  
Madeleine M. Janin ◽  
Claire E. Wakefield ◽  
Kay Bussey ◽  
...  

Background: One in four school-aged children is bullied. However, the risk may be greater for childhood cancer patients/survivors (diagnosed <18 years), because of symptoms of the disease and treatment that may prejudice peers. While the serious consequences of bullying are well documented in the general population, bullying may have even greater impact in children with cancer due to the myriad of challenges associated with treatment and prolonged school absence. Objective: To summarize the state of evidence on bullying in childhood cancer patients/survivors; specifically, the rate and types of bullying experienced and the associated factors. Method: We searched five electronic databases from inception to February 2018 for original research articles reporting on bullying in childhood cancer patients/survivors. Results: We identified 29 eligible articles, representing 1,078 patients/survivors ( M = 14.35 years). Self-reports from patients/survivors revealed a considerably higher rate of bullying (32.2%) compared with the general population (25%). Our review identified little information on the factors associated with bullying in patients/survivors. However, the bullying described tended to be verbal and was often related to the physical side effects of treatment, indicating that differences in appearance may prejudice peers. It was further suggested that educating the child’s classmates about cancer may prevent bullying. Conclusions: Our findings confirm that bullying is a significant challenge for many childhood cancer patients/survivors. Additional studies are needed to identify factors that may influence the risk of bullying, which will inform the development of evidence-based interventions and guidelines to prevent bullying in childhood cancer patients/survivors.


Author(s):  
Brid Featherstone ◽  
Anna Gupta ◽  
Kate Morris ◽  
Sue White

This chapter discusses the residual, but strongly legitimised, role for the state in preventing damage to children, which carries high levels of criticism for those parents seen as failing to optimise their child's developmental potential. The idea that childhood experiences are important and can be formative clearly has a common-sense truth to it and obviously, traumatic experiences in childhood will have lasting impacts. However, a vocabulary has emerged in which notions of toxic parenting and the quest for optimum developmental flourishing create new mandates for the state to act. The chapter then argues that these are necessary to explain the sharp rises in national rates of child removal, particularly the permanent removal of very small children, documented over the last decade. They also contribute to service fragmentation by privileging intervention in the early years in the form of ‘evidence-based’ parenting programmes.


2003 ◽  
Vol 197 (3) ◽  
pp. 521-522
Author(s):  
Peter WH Woodruff

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 926-927
Author(s):  
Belinda C.S. Pearce ◽  
Roanne N. Fiddes ◽  
Nirmala Paramanathan ◽  
Natalie Chand ◽  
Siobhan A.M. Laws ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document