Access to Essential Surgical Care in Chiapas, Mexico: A System-Wide Geospatial Analysis

Author(s):  
Fernando Carrillo-Villaseñor ◽  
Zachary Fowler ◽  
Ellie Moeller ◽  
Lina Roa ◽  
Valeria Macias ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 639-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin Tansley ◽  
Barclay T. Stewart ◽  
Adam Gyedu ◽  
Godfred Boakye ◽  
Daniel Lewis ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 1462-1469 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Spiegel ◽  
Fizan Abdullah ◽  
Raymond R. Price ◽  
Richard A. Gosselin ◽  
Stephen W. Bickler

Author(s):  
Deeptiman James ◽  
Faye M. Evans ◽  
Ekta Rai ◽  
Nobhojit Roy

Abstract Background Mismatched surgeon-anesthesiologist ratios often exist in low-resource settings making safe emergency essential surgical care challenging. This study is an audit of emergency essential procedures performed for lower-limb (LL) musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) when an anesthesiologist was unavailable. It aims to identify strategies for safe anesthesia. Methods A 5-year retrospective audit of emergency essential LL orthopedic procedures performed at remote mission hospital in Central India was performed. Out of necessity, a regional anesthesia (RA) protocol was developed in collaboration with anesthesiologists familiar with the setting. The incidence of intraoperative surgical and perioperative anesthesia complications when RA was administered by a surgeon was evaluated. Results During this period, 766 emergency essential LL MSDs procedures were performed. An anesthesiologist was available for only 6/766. RA was administered by a surgeon for 283/766. This included spinal anesthesia (SA) for 267/283 patients, peripheral nerve blocks for 16/283. Local infiltration and/or sedation was administered to 477/766. There were 17 intraoperative surgical complications. Anesthesia-related complications included 37/267 patients who required multiple attempts to localize subarachnoid space and SA failure in 9/267 patients all of whom had successful re-administration. Additional sedation and infiltration of local anesthetic was required in 5/267 patients. Conclusion Remote pre-anesthesia consultation for high-risk patients, local surgeon-anesthesiologist networking, protocol-guided management, and dedicated short duration of training in anesthesia may be considered as an alternative for delivering RA for emergency essential surgery for LL MSDs due to unavailability of anesthesiologists.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e029812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic Bagguley ◽  
Andrew Fordyce ◽  
Jose Guterres ◽  
Alito Soares ◽  
Edgar Valadares ◽  
...  

ObjectivesOur objectives were to characterise the nature and extent of delay times to essential surgical care in a developing nation by measuring the actual stages of delay for patients receiving Bellwether procedures.SettingThe study was conducted at Timor Leste’s national referral hospital in Dili, the country’s capital.ParticipantsAll patients requiring a Bellwether procedure over a 2-month period were included in the study. Participants whose procedure was undertaken more than 24 hours from initial hospital presentation were excluded.Primary and secondary outcome measuresData pertaining to the patient journey from onset of symptoms to emergency procedure was collected by interview of patients, their treating surgeons or anaesthetists and the medical records. Timelines were then calculated against the Three Delays Framework.ResultsFifty-six patients were entered into the study. Their mean delay from symptom onset to entering the anaesthesia bay for a procedure was 32.3 hours (+/-11.6). The second delay (4.1+/-2.5 hours) was significantly less than the first (20.9+/-11.5 hours; p<0.005) and third delays (7.2+/-1.2 hours; p<0.05). Additionally, patients with acute abdominal pain (of which 18/20 ultimately had open appendicectomy and two emergency laparotomies) had a delay time of 53.3 hours (+/-21.3), significantly more than that for emergency caesarean (22.9+/-18.6 hours; p<0.05) or management of an open long-bone fracture (15.5+/-5.56 hours; p<0.05).ConclusionsSubstantial delays were observed for all three stages and each Bellwether procedure. This study methodology could be used to measure access and the three delays to emergency surgical care in low/middle-income countries, although the actual reasons for delay may vary between regions and countries and would require a qualitative study.


2019 ◽  
Vol 229 (4) ◽  
pp. e132-e133
Author(s):  
Sameen Siddiqi ◽  
Muhammad Sohaib Khan ◽  
Narjis Rizvi ◽  
Imran Naeem ◽  
Sadaf Khan

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 2613-2621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barclay T. Stewart ◽  
Adam Gyedu ◽  
Francis Abantanga ◽  
Abdul Rashid Abdulai ◽  
Godfred Boakye ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 227 (4) ◽  
pp. S134
Author(s):  
Jamie E. Anderson ◽  
Oghenekaro A. Enivwenae ◽  
Matthias I. Igoche ◽  
Paschal A. Anyanwu ◽  
Emmanuel A. Ameh

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2666-2673
Author(s):  
Nicole Lin ◽  
Obieze Nwanna-Nzewunwa ◽  
Melissa Carvalho ◽  
Aaron Wange ◽  
Mary M. Ajiko ◽  
...  

Proceedings ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Christopher Strader ◽  
Abhishek Swarup ◽  
Megan Thuy Vu ◽  
Rachel Koch ◽  
Haitham Shoman ◽  
...  

A summary of the eighth World Health Organization (WHO) Global Initiative for Emergency and Essential Surgical Care (GIEESC) Biennial Meeting, which was held in conjunction with the Royal Australian College of Surgeons (RACS) eighty-eighth Annual Scientific Congress in Bangkok, Thailand.


2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1335-1340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthijs Botman ◽  
Rinse J. Meester ◽  
Roeland Voorhoeve ◽  
Henning Mothes ◽  
Jaymie A. Henry ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document