scholarly journals Pain Management During Uterine Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 809-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. E. Lampmann ◽  
P. N. Lohle ◽  
A. Smeets ◽  
P. F. Boekkooi ◽  
H. Vervest ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Amer Malouhi ◽  
Rene Aschenbach ◽  
Anna Erbe ◽  
Zbigniew Owsianowski ◽  
Stefan Rußwurm ◽  
...  

Purpose To assess the effectiveness of pain management with superior hypogastric plexus block (SHPB) compared to epidural anesthesia (EDA) in women requiring uterine artery embolization (UAE). Materials and Methods In this retrospective, single-center, non-randomized trial we included 79 women with symptomatic uterine fibroids who were scheduled for percutaneous, transcatheter UAE. According to their informed decision, the women were assigned to two different approaches of pain management including either SHPB or EDA. The effectiveness outcome measure was patient reported pain using a numeric rating scale ranging from 1 to 10. The pain score was assessed at UAE, 2 hours thereafter, and at subsequent intervals of 6 hours up to 36 hours after intervention. Results Treatment groups did not differ significantly regarding age, pain score for regular menstrual cramps, uterine fibroid size, location, and symptoms of uterine fibroids. During UAE and up to 6 hours thereafter, women who received SHPB experienced stronger pain than those who received EDA (mean pain score during UAE: 3.3 vs. 1.5, p < 0.001; at 2 hours: 4.4 vs. 2.8, p = 0.012; at 6 hours: 4.4 vs. 2.6, p = 0.021). The maximum pain level was 5.8 ± 2.9 with SHPB and 4.5 ± 2.9 with EDA (p = 0.086). Women with a history of severe menorrhagia tended to experience worse pain than those without (regression coefficient 2.5 [95 % confidence interval –0.3 to 5.3], p = 0.076). Conclusion Among women who underwent UAE, pain management including SHPB resulted in stronger pain during and after the procedure than pain treatment including EDA. Key Points: Citation Format


2009 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 756-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne J. Voogt ◽  
Jolanda De Vries ◽  
Willem Fonteijn ◽  
Paul N.M. Lohle ◽  
Peter F. Boekkooi

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey L. Roberson ◽  
Lauren N. Krumeich ◽  
Nabil F. Darwich ◽  
Victor Babatunde ◽  
Dorottya Laczko ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Uterine artery embolization in the treatment of uterine leiomyoma has been rarely associated with dislodgement and expulsion of infarcted uterine fibroids through the vagina, peritoneum, or bowel wall, predominantly occurring within 6 months of uterine artery embolization. Case presentation We present the case of a 54-year-old African American woman who underwent uterine artery embolization 11 years prior and developed mechanical small bowel obstruction from the migration of fibroid through a uteroenteric fistula with ultimate impaction within the distal small bowel lumen. Small bowel resection and hysterectomy were curative. Conclusions Uteroenteric fistula with small bowel obstruction due to fibroid expulsion may present as a delayed finding after uterine artery embolization and requires heightened awareness.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 13-18
Author(s):  
Elmira T. Nurmukhametova

Uterine fibroids are one of the main causes of hysterectomy. This radical method of treatment allows to control such symptoms as pain and bleeding, but significantly worsens womens quality of life, preventing them from their childbearing function. This article includes the results of domestic and foreign studies on organ-preserving methods of treatment of uterine fibroids published within 10 years. The method of uterine artery embolization, which is preferred by an increasing number of doctors and patients suffering from fibroids, is also described in the article. The search for articles was carried out in the databases Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document