scholarly journals A phase 1, open-label, drug–drug interaction study of rucaparib with rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingxiang Liao ◽  
Krzysztof G. Jeziorski ◽  
Monika Tomaszewska-Kiecana ◽  
István Láng ◽  
Marek Jasiówka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Oral Contraceptives ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Drug Drug Interaction

Abstract Purpose This study aimed at evaluating the effect of rucaparib on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives in patients with advanced solid tumors and the safety of rucaparib with and without coadministration of rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives. Methods Patients received single doses of oral rosuvastatin 20 mg (Arm A) or oral contraceptives ethinylestradiol 30 µg + levonorgestrel 150 µg (Arm B) on days 1 and 19 and continuous doses of rucaparib 600 mg BID from day 5 to 23. Serial blood samples were collected with and without rucaparib for pharmacokinetic analysis. Results Thirty-six patients (n = 18 each arm) were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of study drug. In the drug–drug interaction analysis (n = 15 each arm), the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of maximum concentration (Cmax) with and without rucaparib was 1.29 for rosuvastatin, 1.09 for ethinylestradiol, and 1.19 for levonorgestrel. GMR of area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to last quantifiable measurement (AUC0–last) was 1.34 for rosuvastatin, 1.43 for ethinylestradiol, and 1.56 for levonorgestrel. There was no increase in frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) when rucaparib was given with either of the probe drugs. In both arms, most TEAEs were mild in severity and considered unrelated to study treatment. Conclusion Rucaparib 600 mg BID weakly increased the plasma exposure to rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives. Rucaparib safety profile when coadministered with rosuvastatin or oral contraceptives was consistent with that of rucaparib monotherapy. Dose adjustments of rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives are not necessary when coadministered with rucaparib. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03954366; Date of registration May 17, 2019.

A phase 1/2 trial of ORIN1001, a first-in-class IRE1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3080-3080
Author(s):  
Nashat Y. Gabrail ◽  
Erika P. Hamilton ◽  
Anthony D. Elias ◽  
Mothaffar F. Rimawi ◽  
Chao Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label

3080 Background: ORIN1001 is a first-in-class small molecule with a novel, unique enzyme and mode of inhibition that selectively inhibits Inositol Requiring Enzyme 1α (IRE1) RNAse and blocks X-Box Binding Protein 1 (XBP1) activation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). IRE1α/XBP1 has been implicated in a host of pathologies, and molecules that modulate it are under intense investigation for the treatment of oncologic, metabolic, neurodegenerative and other diseases. ORIN1001 has demonstrated preclinical anti-tumor activity alone and in combination with standard of care across multiple animal models including breast, prostate, lung, liver, pancreatic, brain, colon, ovarian, esophageal, and hematologic cancers and is now undergoing first-in-human testing. Methods: A phase 1, open label, 3+3 dose escalation trial is testing ORIN1001 administered PO daily to patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors (single agent) or relapsed refractory breast cancer (in combination with Abraxane). The phase 1 dose escalation part of the trial evaluates the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of ORIN1001. After identification of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for the single agent, the dose expansion part of the trial will test ORIN1001 in combination with Abraxane. Results: As of Jan 25, 2021, 22 patients with advanced cancer have received ORIN1001 dosed at 100mg, 200mg or 300mg per day in 21-day continuous cycles with a median age of 61 (range 42-77). The pts had received a median of 4 prior line of treatments. Two DLTs were observed at 200 mg with thrombocytopenia and rash. MTD has not been reached. Common (>15%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included nausea, vomiting, rash, fatigue, and hypokalaemia. The vast majority of these events were Grade 1-2 in severity. Seven (32%) pts had at least 1 TRAE grade≥ 3, the most frequent of which were thrombocytopenia (N=3) and rash (N=3). Preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis showed ORIN1001 exposure to increase in a dose proportional manner. Mean t1/2 at steady state was 18 hrs. Thirteen pts were evaluated for preliminary efficacy. Best response, per RECIST 1.1, was stable disease (SD) in 8 pts while 5 pts had progressive disease (PD). For 2 ongoing patients with advanced liver or colorectal cancer, duration of treatment has exceeded 300 days and 570 days, respectively. Conclusions: To date, the phase 1 part of the first-in-human trial has demonstrated a reasonable safety and pharmacokinetic profile for ORIN1001 at 100mg and 200mg dose levels. While efficacy data have yet to mature, chronic dosing achieved in pts with heavily treated advanced solid tumors, suggests clinical potential for in the setting of advanced solid cancers. The phase 2 part of the trial testing ORIN1001 in combination with Abraxane is currently enrolling pts with advanced breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03950570.

An open-label, randomized, parallel-group study of the pharmacokinetics of trifluridine as a component of TAS-102 versus FTD alone.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 751-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weijing Sun ◽  
Lee S. Rosen ◽  
Drew W. Rasco ◽  
Kenichiro Yoshida ◽  
Jabed Seraj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Multiple Doses ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Grade 3

751 Background: TAS-102 is a novel oral combination therapy of FTD plus tipiracil hydrochloride (TPI) with FTD:TPI molar and weight ratios of 1:0.5 and 1:0.471, respectively. FTD is a thymidine-based nucleoside analog that has shown antitumor effects in preclinical and clinical studies. TPI stabilizes orally administered FTD by inhibiting thymidine phosphorylase and TAS-102 has shown efficacy in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. The objective of this study was to show that TPI, administered with FTD as TAS-102, increases exposure to FTD in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This is a Phase 1, randomized, open-label, pharmacokinetic study of TAS-102 in patients with advanced solid tumors. On the morning of Day 1, one group received TAS-102 35 mg/m2 and the other group received FTD 35 mg/m2. Both groups received TAS-102 35 mg/m2 on the evening of Day 1, then twice daily on Days 2-5 and 8-12 in a 28-day cycle. Blood samples were collected to evaluate FTD AUC0-last and Cmax (primary endpoints). Results: Overall, 44 patients (50% male, mean age 57 years) were treated. After a single dose, the ratio of the geometric mean of FTD AUC0-last and Cmax were 38- and 22-fold higher, respectively (Table) following TAS-102 vs FTD alone. After multiple doses (Day 12 in Cycles 1, 2, or 3), FTD AUC and Cmax were ~3- and 2-fold higher, respectively, than after a single dose of TAS-102 (Day 1). For TPI, AUC and Cmax were similar after single and multiple doses of TAS-102. After Cycle 1, FTD did not accumulate with successive cycles of TAS-102 treatment. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were nausea (47.7%), fatigue (31.8%), and anemia (27.3%), with Grade 3-4 events at 4.5%, 2.3%, and 18.2%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 decreases in neutrophil counts were observed in 42.9% of the TAS-102 group. Conclusions: TPI, in combination with FTD, substantially increased exposure to FTD vs FTD alone. Clinical trial information: NCT01867866. [Table: see text]

Abstract 455: Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Drug-drug Interaction between LCZ696 and Hydrochlorothiazide

Hypertension ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsiu-Ling Hsiao ◽  
Michael Greeley ◽  
Parasar Pal ◽  
Thomas Langenickel ◽  
Gangadhar Sunkara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Upper Bound ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Compartmental Analysis ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Neprilysin Inhibitor ◽  
Drug Drug Interaction

Objective: LCZ696 is a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) being developed for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension and heart failure. Ingestion of LCZ696 results in systemic exposure to AHU377 (inactive prodrug of LBQ657, a neprilysin inhibitor) and valsartan (angiotensin receptor blocker). Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is indicated as first line treatment of hypertension. Since LCZ696 and HCTZ may be co-administered for optimal blood pressure control, this study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interaction potential between LCZ696 and HCTZ. Methods: An open-label, three-period, single sequence study in 27 healthy subjects was conducted. In Period 1, subjects received oral HCTZ 25 mg qd x 4 days and were discharged for a 4-10 day washout. In Period 2, subjects received LCZ696 400 mg qd x 5 days, and in Period 3, HCTZ 25 mg qd + LCZ696 400 mg qd x 4 days. Serial PK samples were collected and analyzed by a validated LC-MS/MS method. PK parameters (AUCtau,ss,Cmax,ss) of LCZ696 analytes (LBQ657, valsartan) and HCTZ in plasma were determined using non-compartmental analysis, and the results were statisticallyevaluated. Results: The 90% CIs confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratio for AUCtau,ss of HCTZ fell within the ( 0.8 - 1.25) range, while those of Cmax,ss (0.74, 0.70-0.78) fell outside the range, indicating Cmax,ss of HCTZ decreased by 26% when co-administered with LCZ696. Those for AUCtau,ss of LBQ657 fell within the range but the upper bound for Cmax,ss (1.19, 1.10-1.28) was outside the range, indicating Cmax of LBQ657 increased by 19%; the upper bound for valsartan exposures(AUCtau,ss: 1.14, 1.00-1.29; Cmax,ss: 1.16, 0.98-1.37) were above the range, indicating AUCtau,ss and Cmax,ss of valsartan increased by 14%and 16%, respectively. Conclusion: When LCZ696 400mg qd and HCTZ 25mg qd were co- administered, AUCtau,ss of HCTZ was unchanged but Cmax,ss decreased by 26%; AUCtau,ss of LBQ657 was unchanged but Cmax,ss increased by 19%; and lastly, AUCtau,ss and Cmax,ss of valsartan increased by 14%and 16%, respectively. LCZ696 400 mg qd was safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects when administered alone and in combination with HCTZ 25 mg qd.

Phase 1 open-label study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of dilpacimab in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
pp. molcanther.0985.2020
Author(s):  
Michael S. Gordon ◽  
John Nemunaitis ◽  
Minal Barve ◽  
Zev A. Wainberg ◽  
Erika P. Hamilton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Label Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document