scholarly journals Real-time eye lens dose monitoring during cerebral angiography procedures

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Safari ◽  
J. H. D. Wong ◽  
K. A. A. Kadir ◽  
N. K. Thorpe ◽  
D. L. Cutajar ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
R P Kollaard ◽  
E Carinou ◽  
M Ginjaume ◽  
L Struelens

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margherita Betti ◽  
Lorenzo Nicola Mazzoni ◽  
Giacomo Belli ◽  
Luca Bernardi ◽  
Sara Bicchi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 183 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Piwowarska-Bilska ◽  
Aleksandra Supinska ◽  
Jacek Iwanowski ◽  
Bozena Birkenfeld

Author(s):  
Munehiko Kowatari ◽  
Hayo Zutz ◽  
Oliver Hupe

Abstract A commercially available active extremity dosemeter is a promising candidate for medical staff aid individual monitoring of the eye lens. We investigated the applicability of the newly developed active extremity dosemeter, which uses a low-energy photon probe, to eye lens dose monitoring by performing a complete characterization of the dosemeters. Performance tests revealed that the active extremity dosemeter would overestimate personal dose equivalent, Hp(3), when the probe is worn close to the lens of the eye of a medial worker without any improvement in the response. Introducing an appropriate filter into the probe for low-energy photon has proven to improve the response. The dosemeter then satisfies the criteria of the personal dosemeter for eye lens dosimetry and can be applicable to individual monitoring of eye lens dose. This article also discusses the applicability of the dosemeter to area monitoring for decision making regarding additional monitoring of the eye lens and the extremities.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 503-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F James ◽  
Kristin JoAnn Wainwright ◽  
Hilal A Kanaan ◽  
Suzanne Hudson ◽  
Mark Edison Wainwright ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 83-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Scalchi ◽  
Jessica Magagna ◽  
Giuseppe Mansi Montenegro ◽  
Mario Beghetto ◽  
Luca Boi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marcus Christian Müller ◽  
Michael Windemuth ◽  
Sophie Frege ◽  
Eva Nadine Striepens

Background: Chronic exposure to occupational ionising radiation is seen as one reason for elevated cancer prevalence. </P><P> Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate radiation exposure of anaesthetists by real-time dosimetry. Methods: Data of 296 patients were analyzed. Ten types of trauma operation procedures including osteosynthesis of upper and lower extremity fractures and minimally invasive stabilisation of traumatic and osteoporotic vertebral fractures were accomplished. Evaluation was performed by an occupational dosimetry system, which visualises anaesthetists radiation exposure feedback compared to surgeons in real-time. Results: A significantly lower radiation exposure to anaesthetists compared to surgeons was observed in four types of operative procedures: Plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures, osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures, stabilisation of traumatic and osteoporotic vertebral fractures. In four types of operations (plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral, distal radial and tibial fractures and intramedullary nailing of the clavicle), anaesthetists` amount of radiation exceeded one-third of the surgeons' exposure, especially if the C-arm tube was positioned close to the anaesthetists work station at the patients' head. Conclusion: By using the occupational radiation dose monitoring system, radiation exposure to anaesthetists was visualised in real-time during trauma operations. Radiation exposure of anaesthetists depends on the type of operation and the position of the C-arm. The system may help to increase anaesthetists` awareness concerning radiation exposure and to enhance compliance in using radiation protection techniques.


Radiology ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 152 (2) ◽  
pp. 534-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
D W Chakeres ◽  
W Wiatrowski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document