scholarly journals Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with compressed sensing at 1.5 T: clinical application for the evaluation of branch duct IPMN of the pancreas

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 6014-6021
Author(s):  
Benjamin Henninger ◽  
Michael Steurer ◽  
Michaela Plaikner ◽  
Elisabeth Weiland ◽  
Werner Jaschke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Compressed Sensing ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Branch Duct ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lesion Conspicuity ◽  
Short Breath

Abstract Objectives To evaluate magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with compressed sensing (CS) for the assessment of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN) of the pancreas. For this purpose, conventional navigator-triggered (NT) sampling perfection with application-optimized contrast using different flip angle evolutions (SPACE) MRCP was compared with various CS-SPACE-MRCP sequences in a clinical setting. Methods A total of 41 patients (14 male, 27 female, mean age 68 years) underwent 1.5-T MRCP for the evaluation of BD-IPMN. The MRCP protocol consisted of the following sequences: conventional NT-SPACE-MRCP, CS-SPACE-MRCP with long (BHL, 17 s) and short single breath-hold (BHS, 8 s), and NT-CS-SPACE-MRCP. Two board-certified radiologists evaluated image quality, duct sharpness, duct visualization, lesion conspicuity, confidence, and communication with the main pancreatic duct in consensus using a 5-point scale (1–5), with higher scores indicating better quality/delineation/confidence. Maximum intensity projection reconstructions and originally acquired data were used for evaluation. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the intra-individual difference between sequences. Results BHS-CS-SPACE-MRCP had the highest scores for image quality (3.85 ± 0.79), duct sharpness (3.81 ± 1.05), and duct visualization (3.81 ± 1.01). There was a significant difference compared with NT-CS-SPACE-MRCP (p < 0.05) but no significant difference to the standard NT-SPACE-MRCP (p > 0.05). Concerning diagnostic quality, BHS-CS-SPACE-MRCP had the highest scores in lesion conspicuity (3.95 ± 0.92), confidence (4.12 ± 1.08), and communication (3.8 ± 1.06), significantly higher compared with NT-SPACE-MRCP, BHL-SPACE-MRCP, and NT-CS-SPACE-MRCP (p = <0.05). Conclusions MRCP with CS 3D SPACE for the evaluation of BD-IPMN at 1.5 T provides the best results using a short breath-hold sequence. This approach is feasible and an excellent alternative to standard NT 3D MRCP sequences. Key Points • 1.5-T MRCP with compressed sensing for the evaluation of branch duct IPMN is a feasible method. • Short breath-hold sequences provide the best results for this purpose.

scholarly journals Comparison of Compressed Sensing and Gradient and Spin-Echo in Breath-Hold 3D MR Cholangiopancreatography: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 634
Author(s):  
Weon Jang ◽  
Ji Soo Song ◽  
Sang Heon Kim ◽  
Jae Do Yang
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Compressed Sensing ◽  
Spin Echo ◽  
Contrast Ratio ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Breath Holding ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Background Suppression ◽  
Time Saving ◽  
Noise Ratio

While magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is routinely used, compressed sensing MRCP (CS-MRCP) and gradient and spin-echo MRCP (GRASE-MRCP) with breath-holding (BH) may allow sufficient image quality with shorter acquisition times. This study qualitatively and quantitatively compared BH-CS-MRCP and BH-GRASE-MRCP and evaluated their clinical effectiveness. Data from 59 consecutive patients who underwent both BH-CS-MRCP and BH-GRASE-MRCP were qualitatively analyzed using a five-point Likert-type scale. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the common bile duct (CBD), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the CBD and liver, and contrast ratio between periductal tissue and the CBD were measured. Paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and McNemar’s test were used for statistical analysis. No significant differences were found in overall image quality or duct visualization of the CBD, right and left 1st level intrahepatic duct (IHD), cystic duct, and proximal pancreatic duct (PD). BH-CS-MRCP demonstrated higher background suppression and better visualization of right (p = 0.004) and left 2nd level IHD (p < 0.001), mid PD (p = 0.003), and distal PD (p = 0.041). Image quality degradation was less with BH-GRASE-MRCP than BH-CS-MRCP (p = 0.025). Of 24 patients with communication between a cyst and the PD, 21 (87.5%) and 15 patients (62.5%) demonstrated such communication on BH-CS-MRCP and BH-GRASE-MRCP, respectively. SNR, contrast ratio, and CNR of BH-CS-MRCP were higher than BH-GRASE-MRCP (p < 0.001). Both BH-CS-MRCP and BH-GRASE-MRCP are useful imaging methods with sufficient image quality. Each method has advantages, such as better visualization of small ducts with BH-CS-MRCP and greater time saving with BH-GRASE-MRCP. These differences allow diverse choices for visualization of the pancreaticobiliary tree in clinical practice.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3 Tesla: Image quality comparison between 3D compressed sensing and 2D single-shot acquisitions

2019 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian K. Lohöfer ◽  
Georgios A. Kaissis ◽  
Michael Rasper ◽  
Christoph Katemann ◽  
Andreas Hock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Compressed Sensing ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
3 Tesla ◽  
Single Shot

scholarly journals Optimized Breath-Hold Compressed-Sensing 3D MR Cholangiopancreatography at 3T: Image Quality Analysis and Clinical Feasibility Assessment

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 376
Author(s):  
Ji Soo Song ◽  
Seung Hun Kim ◽  
Bernd Kuehn ◽  
Mun Young Paek
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Compressed Sensing ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Contrast Ratio ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Quality Analysis ◽  
Acquisition Time ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Background Suppression ◽  
Noise Ratio

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has been widely used in clinical practice, and recently developed compressed-sensing accelerated MRCP (CS-MRCP) has shown great potential in shortening the acquisition time. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility and image quality of optimized breath-hold CS-MRCP (BH-CS-MRCP) and conventional navigator-triggered MRCP. Data from 124 consecutive patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary diseases were analyzed by two radiologists using a five-point Likert-type scale. Communication between a cyst and the pancreatic duct (PD) was analyzed. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the common bile duct (CBD), contrast ratio between the CBD and periductal tissue, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the CBD and liver were measured. Optimized BH-CS-MRCP showed significantly fewer artifacts with better background suppression and overall image quality. Optimized BH-CS-MRCP demonstrated communication between a cyst and the PD better than conventional MRCP (96.7% vs. 76.7%, p = 0.048). SNR, contrast ratio, and CNR were significantly higher with optimized BH-CS-MRCP (p < 0.001). Optimized BH-CS-MRCP showed comparable or even better image quality than conventional MRCP, with improved visualization of communication between a cyst and the PD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document