A family of shrinkage estimators for Weibull shape parameter in censored sampling

2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 513-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Housila Prasad Singh ◽  
Sharad Saxena ◽  
Harshada Joshi
2022 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 407-426
Author(s):  
Mehdi Balui ◽  
Einolah Deiri ◽  
Farshin Hormozinejad ◽  
Ezzatallah Baloui Jamkhaneh ◽  
◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Abbas Najim Salman ◽  
Rana Hadi

The present paper deals with the estimation of the shape parameter α of Generalized Exponential GE (α, λ) distribution when the scale parameter λ is known, by using preliminary test single stage shrinkage (SSS) estimator when a prior knowledge available about the shape parameter as initial value due past experiences as well as optimal region R for accepting this prior knowledge.The Expressions for the Bias [B (.)], Mean Squared Error [MSE] and Relative Efficiency [R.Eff (.)] for the proposed estimator is derived.Numerical results about conduct of the considered estimator are discussed include study the mentioned expressions. The numerical results exhibit and put it in tables.Comparisons between the proposed estimator  withe classical estimator  as well as with some earlier studies were made to show the effect and usefulness of the considered estimator.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leila Barmoodeh ◽  
Mehran Naghizadeh Qomi

Considering a Pareto model with unknown shape and scale parameters \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\), respectively, we are interested in Thompson shrinkage test estimation for the shape parameter \(\alpha\) under the Squared Log Error Loss (SLEL) function. We find a risk-unbiased estimator for \(\alpha\) and compute its risk under the SLEL. According to Thompson (1986), we construct the pretest shrinkage (PTS) estimators for \(\alpha\) with the help of a point guess value \(\alpha_0\) and record observations. We investigate the risk-bias of these estimators and compute their risks numerically. A comparison is performed between the PTS estimators and a risk-unbiased estimator. A numerical example is presented for illustrative and comparative purposes. We end the paper by discussion and concluding remarks.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Eman A.A. ◽  
Abbas N .S.

       A reliability system of the multi-component stress-strength model R(s,k) will be considered in the present paper ,when the stress and strength are independent and non-identically distribution have the Exponentiated Family Distribution(FED) with the unknown  shape parameter α and known scale parameter λ  equal to two and parameter θ equal to three. Different estimation methods of R(s,k) were introduced corresponding to Maximum likelihood and Shrinkage estimators. Comparisons among the suggested estimators were prepared depending on simulation established on mean squared error (MSE) criteria.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 461
Author(s):  
Mohammed-El-Amine Khodja ◽  
Ahmed Hamida Boudinar ◽  
Azeddine Bendiabdellah

Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Wakai ◽  
Yuji Kobira ◽  
Takashi Setoya ◽  
Tamotsu Oishi ◽  
Shinichi Yamasaki

Abstract An effective procedure to determine the Burn-In acceleration factors for 130nm and 90 nm processes are discussed in this paper. The relationship among yield, defect density, and reliability, is well known and well documented for defect mechanisms. In particular, it is important to determine the suitable acceleration factors for temperature and voltage to estimate the exact Burn- In conditions needed to screen these defects. The approach in this paper is found to be useful for recent Cu-processes which are difficult to control from a defectivity standpoint. Performing an evaluation with test vehicles of 130nm and 90nm technology, the following acceleration factors were obtained, Ea>0.9ev and β (Beta)>-5.85. In addition, it was determined that a lower defect density gave a lower Weibull shape parameter. As a result of failure analysis, it is found that the main failures in these technologies were caused by particles, and their Weibull shape parameter “m” was changed depending of the related defect density. These factors can be applied for an immature time period where the process and products have failure mechanisms dominated by defects. Thus, an effective Burn-In is possible with classification from the standpoint of defect density, even from a period of technology immaturity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document