Evidence of differences in nitrous oxide emissions and biological nitrification inhibition among Elymus grass species

Author(s):  
Wang Li ◽  
Jianguo Ma ◽  
Saman Bowatte ◽  
Coby Hoogendoorn ◽  
Fujiang Hou
2017 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 156-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan C. Byrnes ◽  
Jonathan Nùñez ◽  
Laura Arenas ◽  
Idupulapati Rao ◽  
Catalina Trujillo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Juan Andres Cardoso ◽  
Kennedy Odokonyero ◽  
Idupulapati Madhusudana Rao ◽  
Juan de la Cruz Jimenez ◽  
Tina Botwright Acuna

2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 1265-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.D. Butler ◽  
Y.Y. Wang ◽  
E. Cartmell ◽  
T. Stephenson

Author(s):  
Jasmeet Kaur-Bhambra ◽  
Daniel L. R. Wardak ◽  
James I. Prosser ◽  
Cécile Gubry-Rangin

AbstractNitrification is a major process within the nitrogen (N) cycle leading to global losses of N, including fertiliser N, from natural and agricultural systems and producing significant nitrous oxide emissions. One strategy for the mitigation of these losses involves nitrification inhibition by plant-derived biological nitrification inhibitors (BNIs). Cultivation-based studies of BNIs, including screening for new compounds, have predominantly investigated inhibition of a single ammonia-oxidising bacterium (AOB), Nitrosomonas europaea, even though ammonia oxidation in soil is usually dominated by ammonia-oxidising archaea (AOA), especially in acidic soils, and AOB Nitrosospira sp., rather than Nitrosomonas, in fertilised soils. This study aimed to assess the sensitivity of ammonia oxidation by a range of AOA and AOB pure cultures to BNIs produced by plant roots (methyl 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) propionate, sakuranetin and 1,9-decanediol) and shoots (linoleic acid, linolenic acid and methyl linoleate). AOA were generally more sensitive to BNIs than AOB, and sensitivity was greater to BNIs produced by shoots than those produced by roots. Sensitivity also varied within AOA and AOB cultures and between different BNIs. In general, N. europaea was not a good indicator of BNI inhibition, and findings therefore highlight the limitations of use of a single bioassay strain and suggest the use of a broader range of strains that are more representative of natural soil communities.


2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1666-1675
Author(s):  
Hai-Ming TANG ◽  
Xiao-Ping XIAO ◽  
Wen-Guang TANG ◽  
Guang-Li YANG

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Khadim Dawar ◽  
Shah Fahad ◽  
M. M. R. Jahangir ◽  
Iqbal Munir ◽  
Syed Sartaj Alam ◽  
...  

AbstractIn this study, we explored the role of biochar (BC) and/or urease inhibitor (UI) in mitigating ammonia (NH3) and nitrous oxide (N2O) discharge from urea fertilized wheat cultivated fields in Pakistan (34.01°N, 71.71°E). The experiment included five treatments [control, urea (150 kg N ha−1), BC (10 Mg ha−1), urea + BC and urea + BC + UI (1 L ton−1)], which were all repeated four times and were carried out in a randomized complete block design. Urea supplementation along with BC and BC + UI reduced soil NH3 emissions by 27% and 69%, respectively, compared to sole urea application. Nitrous oxide emissions from urea fertilized plots were also reduced by 24% and 53% applying BC and BC + UI, respectively, compared to urea alone. Application of BC with urea improved the grain yield, shoot biomass, and total N uptake of wheat by 13%, 24%, and 12%, respectively, compared to urea alone. Moreover, UI further promoted biomass and grain yield, and N assimilation in wheat by 38%, 22% and 27%, respectively, over sole urea application. In conclusion, application of BC and/or UI can mitigate NH3 and N2O emissions from urea fertilized soil, improve N use efficiency (NUE) and overall crop productivity.


Eos ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 89 (51) ◽  
pp. 529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Del Grosso ◽  
Tom Wirth ◽  
Stephen M. Ogle ◽  
William J. Parton

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debasish Saha ◽  
Jason P. Kaye ◽  
Arnab Bhowmik ◽  
Mary Ann Bruns ◽  
John M. Wallace ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document