Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for children with Crohn’s disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 459-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin T. Huntington ◽  
Laura A. Boomer ◽  
Victoria K. Pepper ◽  
Karen A. Diefenbach ◽  
Jennifer L. Dotson ◽  
...  
Surgery Today ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsunekazu Mizushima ◽  
Kiyokazu Nakajima ◽  
Hiroshi Takeyama ◽  
Atsushi Naito ◽  
Hideki Osawa ◽  
...  

Surgery Today ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 242-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Maeda ◽  
Hisashi Nagahara ◽  
Masatsune Shibutani ◽  
Tatsunari Fukuoka ◽  
Shigetomi Nakao ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Valerio Celentano ◽  
◽  
Gianluca Pellino ◽  
Matteo Rottoli ◽  
Francesco Colombo ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) aims to minimize the surgical access trauma by reducing the number of abdominal incisions to a single site, potentially offering better cosmetic results and decreased postoperative pain. In this study, we compare the results of SILS ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease (CD) to conventional laparoscopy and open surgery using a propensity score–matched analysis in a retrospective national multicentre study. Methods All consecutive patients undergoing elective SILS ileocaecal or redo ileocolic resection for primary and recurrent CD from 1 June 2018 to 31 May 2019 were included. Patients were matched 1:1:1 with laparoscopy and open surgery according to perianal disease, recurrent disease, penetrating phenotype of CD, history of previous abdominal surgery, preoperative medical treatment with steroids and anti-TNF. Postoperative morbidity within 30 days of surgery was the primary endpoint. Results Fifty-eight patients were included in each group, for a total of 174 patients. The conversion rate for SILS and laparoscopy was 10.3% and 12%, respectively, with no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications (13.8% and 12%, p = 0.77), whilst open surgery demonstrated a worse morbidity profile, with a complication rate of 25.9% (p < 0.0001). Median length of hospital stay following SILS ileocolic resection was 5 days, significantly shorter compared to 7 days for laparoscopy and 9 for open surgery (p < 0.0001). Conclusions SILS ileocolonic resection for CD demonstrated a comparable morbidity profile compared to laparoscopy in selected patients, with a reduced length of postoperative hospital stay.


Surgery Today ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 361-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Maeda ◽  
Hisashi Nagahara ◽  
Masatsune Shibutani ◽  
Tatsunari Fukuoka ◽  
Toru Inoue ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S357-S357
Author(s):  
Y LI ◽  
Z Zhou ◽  
D Yao ◽  
L Zheng ◽  
Y Duan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) can reduce operation trauma and accelerate postoperative rehabilitation. This study aims to investigate the safety and feasibility of SILS with ERAS in the treatment of Crohn’s disease. Methods Thirty patients with Crohn’s disease were randomly assigned to receive traditional laparoscopic surgery plus ERAS (n = 20) and SILS plus ERAS (n = 18),respectively. Comparisons and analysis were made between the two groups in the perioperative conditions. Results There were significant differences in the mean operation time between the two groups (p &lt; 0.01),There were no significant differences in the intra-operative blood loss, postoperative complications rates, the time to first flatus and treatment cost (p &gt; 0.05). There were significant differences in the postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (p &lt; 0.05). WBC, CRP and PCT in SILS plus ERAS group were lower than those in the control group at the first days and the third days after operation, the differences were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion SILS plus ERAS can shorten postoperative hospital stay and facilitate bowel function recovery in the treatment of Crohn’s disease. It is worthwhile to mention the nice cosmetic benefits of SILS, the perioperative SILS plus ERAS program is safe and effective and should be popularised in Crohn’s disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Shiraishi ◽  
Tetsuro Tominaga ◽  
Takashi Nonaka ◽  
Kiyoaki Hamada ◽  
Masato Araki ◽  
...  

AbstractSingle-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has the potential to improve perioperative outcomes, including less postoperative pain, shorter operation time, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. However, SILS is technically difficult and needs a longer learning curve. Between April 2016 and September 2019, a total of 198 patients with clinical stage I/II right colon cancer underwent curative resection. In the case of the SILS approach, an organ retractor was usually used to overcome SILS-specific restrictions. The patients were divided into two groups by surgical approach: the SILS with organ retractor group (SILS-O, n = 33) and the conventional laparoscopic surgery group (LAC, n = 165). Clinical T status was significantly higher in the LAC group (p = 0.016). Operation time was shorter and blood loss was lower in the SILS-O group compared to the LAC group (117 vs. 197 min, p = 0.027; 10 vs. 25 mL, p = 0.024, respectively). In the SILS-O group, surgical outcomes including operation time, blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and postoperative complications were not significantly different between those performed by experts and by non-experts. Longer operation time (p = 0.041) was significantly associated with complications on univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 2.514, 95%CI 1.047–6.035, p = 0.039). SILS-O was safe and feasible for right colon cancer. There is a potential to shorten the learning curve of SILS using an organ retractor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document