Does anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection worsen long-term oncologic outcome?

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1243-1253
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Hasegawa ◽  
Takeru Matsuda ◽  
Akira Arimoto ◽  
Kimihiro Yamashita ◽  
Masayasu Nishi ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1364-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Creavin ◽  
É. J. Ryan ◽  
M. E. Kelly ◽  
A. Moynihan ◽  
C. E. Redmond ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 94 (12) ◽  
pp. 1548-1554 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Ptok ◽  
F. Marusch ◽  
F. Meyer ◽  
D. Schubert ◽  
I. Gastinger ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 705-705
Author(s):  
Katrina Knight ◽  
Kate Boland ◽  
Donald C McMillan ◽  
Paul G. Horgan ◽  
Campbell SD Roxburgh ◽  
...  

705 Background: The interaction between host and tumour factors is an important determinant of long-term outcome following rectal cancer resection. At cellular level, hypoxia within the tumour microenvironment stimulates neovascularisation, alters tumour metabolism and is implicated in dissemination and metastases. At host level, restricted blood flow to the tumour may play a role in tumour hypoxia. Significant calcification of the distal aortic and iliac arteries could result in impaired rectal perfusion. We aimed to investigate the relationship between aortoiliac calcification (AC) and long-term outcome following rectal cancer resection. Methods: Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Recurrence and survival data were abstracted. On staging CT images, the sum of calcified quadrants of the distal aorta and iliac arteries at the level of the bifurcation was calculated. ROC analysis was used to identify the optimum threshold for determining significant calcification. Results: Between 2008-2016, 181 patients with available CT scans underwent surgery for rectal cancer. Most were male (60%), aged over 65 (53%) and TNM stage II/III (72%). Median follow-up was 63 months. Significant AC was identified in 44 patients (24%). Recurrence occurred in 42 patients: local in 16 (9%) and systemic in 26 (14%) patients. Recurrence was associated with significant AC (p = 0.017), TNM stage (p = 0.002) and venous invasion (p = 0.006). When considering those with and without significant AC, there were differences in the rates of local (11% vs. 8%) and systemic (25% vs. 11%) recurrence respectively (p = 0.043). On univariate Cox regression analysis, overall survival was related to age (p = 0.012), ASA grade (p = 0.042) and significant AC (p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, significant AC (p = 0.011) was the only independent predictor of overall survival. Conclusions: The burden of aortoiliac calcification appears to play an important role in influencing long-term outcome following rectal cancer resection, independent of traditional determinants such as TNM stage and ASA grade. While validation is required, further investigation of the mechanism underlying this relationship is warranted.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 030006052097076
Author(s):  
Enesh Shiwakoti ◽  
Jianning Song ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
Shanshan Wu ◽  
Zhongtao Zhang

Objective Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a frequent complication after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection (LRCR). The main objective of the present study was to identify accurate indicators of AL after LRCR. Methods A retrospective case-control study was performed of 185 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer between March 2012 and February 2017 at Beijing Friendship Hospital. Potential indicators of AL were examined via univariate and multivariate analyses. The performance of multivariate analysis was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results The overall AL rate was 17.84%. Multivariate analysis identified drainage smell (odds ratio [OR = 35.318, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.114 to 175.338) and peritonitis [OR = 17.475, 95% CI = 1.540 to 198.318) as independent indicators of AL. The area under the ROC curve was 0.720 (95% CI = 0.606 to 0.835). Conclusion Drainage smell and peritonitis could be reliable and accurate indicators of AL after LRCR.


2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 566-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Leonard ◽  
Freddy Penninckx ◽  
Annouschka Laenen ◽  
Alex Kartheuser

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document