The use of absorbable adhesion barriers to reduce the incidence of intraperitoneal adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery

2020 ◽  
Vol 302 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-108
Author(s):  
Misgav Rottenstreich ◽  
Reut Rotem ◽  
Ayala Hirsch ◽  
Rivka Farkash ◽  
Amihai Rottenstreich ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 224 (2) ◽  
pp. S694
Author(s):  
Kerly M. Guerrero ◽  
Reshma Parikh ◽  
Eve Swirski ◽  
Kaila Krishnamoorthy ◽  
Lisa Gittens ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 204 (1) ◽  
pp. S182
Author(s):  
Min-Kyung Hyun ◽  
Pil Ryang Lee ◽  
Jae-Yoon Shim ◽  
Hye-Sung Won ◽  
Ahm Kim

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margo Harrison ◽  
Ana Garces ◽  
Lester Figueroa ◽  
Jamie Westcott ◽  
Michael Hambidge ◽  
...  

Abstract Design: Our objectives were to analyze how interpregnancy interval (IPI) was associated with delivery mode and how outcomes varied by these characteristics.Methods: This secondary analysis used data from a prospective study conducted in Chimaltenango, Guatemala from January 2017 through April 2020.Results: Of 26,465 Guatemalan women, 3,170 (12.0%) had a history of prior cesarean. 560 (20.1%) women delivered by vaginal birth after cesarean with the remaining 2,233 (79.9%) delivered by repeat cesarean delivery. Repeat cesarean reduced the risk of needing a dilation and curettage compared to vaginal birth after cesarean, but this association did not vary by IPI (AOR 0.01 – 0.03, p < 0.001). Repeat cesarean delivery, as compared to vaginal birth after cesarean, significantly reduced the likelihood a woman breastfeeding within one hour of birth (AOR 0.009 – 0.10, p < 0.001), but IPI was not associated with the outcome. Regarding stillbirth, repeat cesarean birth reduced the likelihood of stillbirth as compared to vaginal birth (AOR 0.2, p = 0.001 – 0.002), but again IPI was not associated with the outcome.Conclusion: Outcomes by mode of delivery among a Guatemalan cohort of women with a history of prior cesarean birth do not vary by IPI.


Author(s):  
Katherine Johnson ◽  
Brett C. Young

This article provides a summary of a landmark study in obstetrics. The article provides insight on a pivotal question; Is delivery before 39 weeks among patients undergoing elective repeat cesarean delivery associated with increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes? The authors describe the basics of the study, including study location, study population, number of patients, study design, endpoints, results, and limitations. The article briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case. The article places these finding in contemporary context and highlights its impact on obstetric care. In addition, the author reference updated national guidelines developed as a result of this study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Joy Rogers ◽  
Nathaniel G. Rogers ◽  
Meredith L. Kilgore ◽  
Akila Subramaniam ◽  
Lorie M. Harper

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 555-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F.E. Diejomaoh ◽  
Waleed Al-Jassar ◽  
Zainab Bello ◽  
Kavitha Karunakaran ◽  
Asiya Mohammed

Objective: The cesarean delivery rate has increased worldwide. The aim of our study was to assess the events associated with the second cesarean deliveries in our institution. Subjects and Methods: All cesarean deliveries at the Maternity Hospital, Kuwait, from January 1 to December 31, 2013, were identified. A comparative study was undertaken on patients having their first and second cesarean deliveries. The social and clinical characteristics of these patients were extracted from our records and the antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum course of the pregnancies and their outcomes documented. Results: During the study period, 10,586 deliveries were recorded, including 3,676 cesarean deliveries, i.e., a cesarean delivery rate of 34.7%. 840 of these patients were undergoing their first cesarean delivery (group A) and 607 patients were undergoing their second (group B); 484 patients from group A and 341 patients from group B with complete records were analyzed. Mean age (30.89 ± 4.93 vs. 29.94 ± 5.56 years, p = 0.008), parity (1.49 ± 1.22 vs. 0.98 ± 1.60, p < 0.0001), gestational age at delivery (38.12 ± 2.61 vs. 37.66 ± 3.11 weeks, p = 0.02), and fetal birth weight (3,211.60 ± 691.51 vs. 2,829.73 ± 863.26 g, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in group B than in group A. 53.2% of the patients in group B requested repeat cesarean delivery, their second cesarean. The rate of maternal morbidity was low. Conclusions: The incidence of repeat cesarean delivery in group B is high, and its reduction should contribute to a lowering of the overall cesarean delivery rate.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer W. H. Wong

Background. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends that most women with one prior low-transverse cesarean delivery should be offered a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). However, very little is known about TOLAC in women with uterine anomalies. Case. A 32-year-old gravida-2 para-1 female with a history of uterine didelphys and one prior low-transverse cesarean section in the left uterine horn presented with a subsequent pregnancy in the left uterine horn. After extensive counseling on TOLAC versus repeat cesarean delivery, the patient decided to proceed with TOLAC and had a spontaneous vaginal delivery of a healthy infant at 38 3/7 weeks of gestation. Conclusion. TOLAC can be considered in women with uterine anomalies using ACOG’s standard TOLAC guidelines with informed consent and shared decision-making between the patient and obstetrician.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document