Subjects at risk of Parkinson’s disease in health checkup examinees: cross-sectional analysis of baseline data of the NaT-PROBE study

2020 ◽  
Vol 267 (5) ◽  
pp. 1516-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Hattori ◽  
Takashi Tsuboi ◽  
Katsunori Yokoi ◽  
Yasuhiro Tanaka ◽  
Maki Sato ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Mckinnon ◽  
Virgilio Evidente ◽  
Erika Driver-Dunckley ◽  
Ashvini Premkumar ◽  
Joseph Hentz ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. S13
Author(s):  
A. Mahajan ◽  
L. Rosenthal ◽  
C. Gamaldo ◽  
R. Salas ◽  
G. Pontone ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoo Mano ◽  
Ryoji Nishi ◽  
Yosuke Kobayashi ◽  
Koji Matsuo ◽  
Yasushi Kobayashi ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 469-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Fox ◽  
Shmuel Sandler

Although many assume that the relationship between the autocracy-democracy continuum and discrimination is linear, with autocracies discriminating the most and democracies discriminating the least, the assumption is not universal. This study uses the Minorities at Risk dataset to test this relationship with regard to government treatment of religiously differentiated ethnic minorities (ethnoreligious minorities) as well as ethnic minorities that are not religiously differentiated. The results show that the pattern of treatment of ethnoreligious minorities differs from that of other ethnic minorities. The extent to which a state is democratic has no clear influence on the level of discrimination against non-religiously differentiated ethnic minorities, but it has a clear influence on the level of discrimination against ethnoreligious minorities. Autocracies discriminate more than democracies against ethnoreligious minorities, but semi-democracies, those governments that are situated between democracies and autocracies, discriminate even less. This result is consistent on all 11 measures used here and is statistically significant for seven of them, and it remains strong when controlling for other factors, including separatism. This phenomenon increases in strength from the beginning to the end of the 1990s. Also, democracies discriminate against ethnoreligious minorities more than they do against other minorities. The nature of liberal democracy may provide an explanation for this phenomenon.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Miller ◽  
Andres Garchitorena ◽  
Faramalala Rabemananjara ◽  
Laura Cordier ◽  
Marius Randriamanambintsoa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: 50% of Malagasy children have moderate to severe stunting. In 2016, a new 10-year National Nutrition Action Plan (PNAN III) was initiated to help address stunting and developmental delay. We report factors associated with risk of developmental delay in 3 and 4 year olds in the rural district of Ifanadiana in southeastern Madagascar in 2016. Methods: The data are from a cross-sectional analysis of the 2016 wave of IHOPE panel data (a population-representative cohort study begun in 2014). We interviewed women ages 15-49 using the MICS Early Child Development Indicator (ECDI) module, which includes questions for physical, socio-emotional, learning and literacy/numeracy domains. We analyzed ECDI data using standardized z scores for relative relationships for 2 outcomes: at-risk-for-delay vs. an international standard, and lower-development-than-peers if ECDI z scores were >1 standard deviation below study mean. Covariates included demographics, adult involvement, household environment, and selected child health factors. Variables significant at alpha of 0.1 were included a multivariable model; final models used backward stepwise regression, clustered at the sampling level. Results: Of 432 children ages 3 and 4 years, 173 (40%) were at risk for delay compared to international norms and 68 children (16.0%) had lower-development than peers. This was driven mostly by the literacy/numeracy domain, with only 7% of children considered developmentally on track in that domain. 50.5% of children had moderate to severe stunting. 76 (17.6%) had >=4 stimulation activities in past 3 days. Greater paternal engagement (OR 1.59(1.13, 2.21)) was associated with increased delay vs. international norms. Adolescent motherhood (OR3.89 (1.32, 11.48)) decreased children’s development vs. peers. Engagement from a non-parental adult reduced odds of delay for both outcomes (OR(95%CI =0.76 (0.61, 0.93) & 0.28(0.16, 0.50) respectively). Stunting was not associated with delay risk (1.33 (0.83, 2.14) or low development (0.91(0.47, 1.74)) when controlling for other factors. Conclusions: In this setting of high child malnutrition, stunting is not independently associated with developmental risk. A low proportion of children receive developmentally supportive stimulation from adults, but non-parent adults provide more stimulation in general than either mother or father. Stimulation from non-parent adults is associated with lower odds of delay


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document