Evaluating the effective connectivity of resting state networks using conditional Granger causality

2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Liao ◽  
Dante Mantini ◽  
Zhiqiang Zhang ◽  
Zhengyong Pan ◽  
Jurong Ding ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannes Almgren ◽  
Frederik Van de Steen ◽  
Adeel Razi ◽  
Karl Friston ◽  
Daniele Marinazzo

AbstractThe influence of the global BOLD signal on resting state functional connectivity in fMRI data remains a topic of debate, with little consensus. In this study, we assessed the effects of global signal regression (GSR) on effective connectivity within and between resting-state networks – as estimated with dynamic causal modelling (DCM) for resting state fMRI (rsfMRI). DCM incorporates a forward (generative) model that quantifies the contribution of different types of noise (including global measurement noise), effective connectivity, and (neuro)vascular processes to functional connectivity measurements. DCM analyses were applied to two different designs; namely, longitudinal and cross-sectional designs. In the modelling of longitudinal designs, we included four extensive longitudinal resting state fMRI datasets with a total number of 20 subjects. In the analysis of cross-sectional designs, we used rsfMRI data from 361 subjects from the Human Connectome Project. We hypothesized that (1) GSR would have no discernible impact on effective connectivity estimated with DCM, and (2) GSR would be reflected in the parameters representing global measurement noise. Additionally, we performed comparative analyses of the informative value of data with and without GSR. Our results showed negligible to small effects of GSR on connectivity within small (separately estimated) RSNs. For between-network connectivity, we found two important effects: the effect of GSR on between-network connectivity (averaged over all connections) was negligible to small, while the effect of GSR on individual connections was non-negligible. Contrary to our expectations, we found either no effect (in the longitudinal designs) or a non-specific (cross-sectional design) effect of GSR on parameters representing (global) measurement noise. Data without GSR were found to be more informative than data with GSR; however, in small resting state networks the precision of posterior estimates was greater using data after GSR. In conclusion, GSR is a minor concern in DCM studies; however, individual between-network connections (as opposed to average between-network connectivity) and noise parameters should be interpreted quantitatively with some caution. The Kullback-Leibler divergence of the posterior from the prior, together with the precision of posterior estimates, might offer a useful measure to assess the appropriateness of GSR, when nuancing data features in resting state fMRI.


Heliyon ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. e03951
Author(s):  
A. Bernas ◽  
L.E.M. Breuer ◽  
R. Lamerichs ◽  
A.J.A. de Louw ◽  
A.P. Aldenkamp ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengshi Dong ◽  
Likun Xia ◽  
Min Lu ◽  
Chao Li ◽  
Ke Xu ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveIn generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), abnormal top-down control from prefrontal cortex (PFC) to amygdala is a widely accepted hypothesis through which “emotional dysregulation model” may be explained. However, whether and how the PFC directly exerted abnormal top-down control on amygdala remained largely unknown. We aim to investigate the amygdala-based effective connectivity by using Granger causality analysis (GCA).MethodsThirty-five drug-naive patients with GAD and thirty-six healthy controls (HC) underwent resting-state functional MR imaging. We used seed-based Granger causality analysis to examine the effective connectivity between the bilateral amygdala and the whole brain. The amygdala-based effective connectivity was compared between the two groups.ResultsIn HC, the left middle frontal gyrus exerted inhibitory influence on the right amygdala, while in GAD group, this influence was disrupted (single voxel P < 0.001, Gaussian random field corrected with P < 0.01).ConclusionOur finding might provide new insight into the “insufficient top-down control” hypothesis in GAD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document